Slashdot Mirror


High School Kids Beat MIT at Robotics Competition

An anonymous writer submitted a story saying "A bunch of bright high school kids from Carl Hayden Highschool beat out MIT in a Marine Technology Center's Robotics competition. Here are additional details of the competition."

23 of 597 comments (clear)

  1. Future MIT students by gr8_phk · · Score: 5, Insightful

    must attend high school somewhere. Right?

  2. what's the news here? by diegocgteleline.es · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "Talent" is not something exclusive to MIT people.

  3. Wow! by cOdEgUru · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Before this deteriorates in to a Pro/Anti Immigration flame fest, I cannot but feel awe for these four kids who braced odds to be where they are at now. And to know that the odds piled up against their favor include being alien, poor, living in gang infested streets and yet be capable of this?

    For one, I hope the media picks this up, not just Wired. I hope they get as much visibility as they can, on their plight, the lives they live and their achievements. We have all heard and read of ordinary people who surmounted amazing odds to claim their personal victories, but seemingly they happen far less and few in between. What this country need to know is despite poverty, crime and the potential to go wrong, not one, but four kids chose the right, but tough path. And they should be commended for that till kingdom come.

    But for what we have seen, the INS would pick them up next week and hand them back to a grateful Mexico.

  4. Start making them citizens by goldspider · · Score: 4, Insightful
    "The four teenagers who built it are all undocumented Mexican immigrants who came to this country through tunnels or hidden in the backseats of cars."

    These kids are exactly the kind of people we should be encouraging to come to this country; smart, clever, hard-working, creative.

    Yet they are here illegally, and something needs to be done about that. If these kids are as smart as the article suggests (and I have no reason to believe otherwise), attaining citizenship shouldn't be particularly taxing.

    --
    "Ask not what your country can do for you." --John F. Kennedy
    1. Re:Start making them citizens by lpangelrob2 · · Score: 4, Insightful
      When it comes down to how I feel about everyone entering this country, they are all at the very least hard-working, and how they get into this country at least implies creativity bordering on self-sacrifice (read the biyearly stories about Mexican thieving 'coyotes').

      It just so happens Americans (and thus, politicians) need to figure out what the policy is going to actually be regarding illegal immigrants. Because at some point, all of the following are true:

      1.) they don't generate tax revenue for the services they are receiving... and what they are paid is woefully inadequate by U.S. standards
      2.) they are generally capable workers
      3.) they are generally putting themselves at great bodily danger to risk later eviction
      4.) most states have stopped servicing immigrants.

      In spite of the fact that in those same states, the immigrants are doing the jobs that Americans won't take.

      So we have demand for work that goes undone, supply in the form of willing workers, and ridiculous policies in the middle that reinforce all four points above.

      Can you tell I'm in favor of a cross-border working program?

  5. These are not Future MIT students by RichMan · · Score: 5, Insightful

    RTFA, unless someone with $ steps up to the plate these are not future MIT students. They are currently in manual labor jobs and likely to stay there.

    These students come from disadvantaged backgrounds and are unable to get into MIT. Half of them have graduated and they are not getting further education as they cannot afford it.

    1. Re:These are not Future MIT students by Whafro · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Apparently you haven't heard about how top schools handle their financial aid nowadays. The top tier of schools in the country have what is called "need-blind" admissions, where they will accept anyone who is qualified to attend, regardless of their ability to pay the full tuition. Once someone is accepted, their full financial need is met completely, and in a way that doesn't put them in debt up to their eyebrows.

      At MIT in particular, more than 75% of students receive financial aid, and ALL of it is based on their financial need. Scholarships, in the merit-based sense, do not substantially exist at MIT--or most top schools. The barrier for attending these schools, at least for those who have managed to overcome barriers they have faced before the admissions process, is a merit-based barrier, and not a financial one.

      What schools, such as MIT as well as the college I attend, figure is that anyone who has demonstrated that they should be accepted to the institution has demonstrated that they deserve a "scholarship," so the funds go to those who need it most. It's not like at a large state school, where there is a tier of smart kids, and a tier of not-so-smart kids. If you can get into MIT, you're smart, and choosing scholarship recipients based on merit would involve splitting hairs.

    2. Re:These are not Future MIT students by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If you're here illegally, you're breaking the law and therefore can't apply for citizenship. They could go back to their own country for a while, then apply using the proper channels.

      Sucks to be these kids though, their parents probably dragged them along as little kids when they decided to break the law themselves.

    3. Re:These are not Future MIT students by TykeClone · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I'd rather see a bright, talented, and driven "undocumented" person attend college than a lazy and unmotivated citizen.

      Same goes for illegal immigrants - if they are here because they want to work and do a good job and stay off of the public dole, more power to them and I have no problem with that.

      --
      A fine is a tax you pay for doing wrong and a tax is a fine you pay for doing all right.
    4. Re:These are not Future MIT students by Hyecee · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I can't tell whether or not you're trolling or actually believe that. Nothing will be good for the United States if it involves a lowering or loss of human rights. Sure, those hopelessly poor illegal immigrants won't be competing with more well off US citizens for higher paying jobs and educations paid for by citizens' taxes, but they will just end up in a cycle of poverty and all the troubles associated with it.

      The United States would be forever improved by accepting immigrants, making them citizens (gotta have those taxes), allowing them to become educated (not the same as just giving them an education; that's a whole other can of worms I do not wish to open) and helping them to become successful in our nation. There will ALWAYS be poorer or uneducated US citizens and immigrants to "provide cheap Wal*Mart labor", for a variety of reasons. You can look at it as a renewable workforce. This way, at least, there will be less competition for AVAILABLE low-end jobs for both groups with the possibility of making your way up the ladder through hard work. Poorer families won't be stuck in a poverty cycle, and can better their situation, or at least the situation for their descendants, and their position will be filled by others when they leave, be it a native citizen who's fallen on hard times, or another immigrant-turned-citizen.

      My point is, after that long-winded argument, is that the US will be better improved through aid and human rights than by a self-perpetuating low-income slave class of illegal immigrants.

      "Give me your tired, your poor, Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free, The wretched refuse of your teeming shore. Send these, the homeless, tempest-tossed to me. I lift my lamp beside the golden door."

    5. Re:These are not Future MIT students by krysith · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That's fine, just don't do it on my tax dollars.

      How about on theirs, then? It's not like illegal immigrants don't pay sales tax, the primary source of state funding. You know, the state funding that supports state colleges. I'm sure that they likely don't pay federal income tax, but then, many citizens in their tax bracket get more back than they pay in, due to tax credits and such.

      Chances are, they pay more taxes than citizens of equal means, without getting nearly as many benefits. Did you mean that you didn't want citizens to go to college on your tax dollars, either?

  6. The kids' future by kneecarrot · · Score: 4, Insightful
    What is rather sad is that these kids have very few prospects for their future. The end of the article explains how, because of their undocumented status, they can only attend University or College as out-of-state students. This drastically increases the cost.

    Yes, I know they are illegal immigrants. But, they are still kids with hopes and dreams.

    --

    I always save my last mod point to mod up a good troll. You people are too serious.

  7. experts vs. newcomers by elmartinos · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Often newbies are better than experts. An expert is stuck with the knowledge and experience gathered over time, it is difficult to think outside this box. A newcomer instead can have fresh, unconvential ideas that most experts probably would laugh about but sometimes produce amazing results.

    On the other side, this may just be an excuse for my laziness ;-)

  8. Followup by saddino · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This article from the Washington Post follows-up the story in Wired. In short (and I suppose unsuprisingly), college isn't an option due to their illegal status (no loans, no in-state tuition). Of the two who have graduated high school: One of them is hanging drywall, and the other files papers at a Social Secuirty office.

  9. Re:Doesn't say much for education by mOdQuArK! · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Depends on how seriously you took the education.

    Although I don't use (and in some cases understand :-) half the stuff they taught me, I feel like the act of trying to understand it increased my ability to understand a larger range of concepts - kind of like working out to increase muscle capacity.

    And the half that I _do_ use turned out be useful at occasionally very unexpected places. So I'm hopeful that I might be able to use some of the other half at some point in my future.

  10. Typical of Engineers by jvandervort · · Score: 5, Insightful

    In the standings here are the breakdowns:

    Engineering Eval:
    Carl Hayden: 53.17
    MIT: 44.67
    Tech Report:
    Carl Hayden: 20.25
    MIT: 17
    Team Display:
    Carl Hayden: 13.5
    MIT: 8
    Mission Task:
    Carl Hayden: 32
    MIT: 48

    Total:
    Carl Hayden: 118.92
    MIT: 117.67

    MIT lost because they didn't care enough about their display:)

    Apparently they were a little too myopic about the task.

    As an engineer myself, it figures:)

  11. The truth... by John+Seminal · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Before this deteriorates in to a Pro/Anti Immigration flame fest, I cannot but feel awe for these four kids who braced odds to be where they are at now.

    I also can't help but think what a loss to their original country they are. America has a way of luring the smartest and most hard working people here with the hopes of a better life. And the country where they came from losses one more leader, one more person who could have had an impact.

    It is like the USA is the Yankee's of world baseball. We don't have to grow our own talent. We can buy it elsewhere. And then, what do we give back to other countries? We open HUGE factories where we move jobs, like when GM closed the plants in Michigan and moved them to Mexico because people there would work for pennies on the dollar.

    What does this say about how the world is being organized?

    --

    Rosco: "If brains were gunpowder, Enos couldn't blow his nose."

  12. "Illegal" Immigration by Concern · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I don't believe it's offtopic, considering how much attention the article devotes to the topic, to consider for a moment the scale and scope of illegal immigration in the U.S..

    If you don't live anywhere near the border, it is probably impossible for you to imagine what has happened over the past two decades in this country. Without any honest debate or policy making, we have entirely, almost formally abdicated the southern border of the United States. Literally millions of "visitors" from other countries now live here. The debate is no longer whether to try to "strengthen the border" but whether or not to give their children driver's licenses and scholarships.

    What we have done is create a de-facto second class of U.S. citizen, a "sub citizen" that provides a convenient array of features to business in the southern U.S..

    Now the avalanche of "issues:" xenophobia, debates about free trade and freedom of movement, patriotism and racism, classism, corny high-school economic ideologies and horse-and-barn-door-ism. The person writing this article seems to have a clear conclusion, after having spent some time in the midst of the issue: these kids are Americans, and we should treat them like Americans. The thing it makes me think of is that many of our reasoned beliefs (especially those coming from farther up in the chilly north) about what we should do about the "illegal immigration" problem - whether they are principled, right, wrong, or crazy - are often a bit divorced from reality, and most ultimately lead to perpetuation of the status quo: the institutional ghetto, the second-class citizen, and the end of what we love, these days, to lionize as the American Dream.

    --
    Tired of Political Trolls? Opt Out!
  13. Re:Doesn't say much for education by Mr.Dippy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    College hardly teaches you anything tangible(unless you major in something really technical). What college does is teach you how to think , solve future problems, and conduct research. All of these things are important for people not to be dumbasses in life.

    --


    -Dipster
  14. I want to go to college too! by drewzhrodague · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I am a US Citizen, severely underemployed, and I cannot afford college either. While I applaud these kids for their efforts, I don't see why illegal aliens can get federal funding to go to college, and I cannot!

    Seriously. When I tried to get financial aid, I was awarded $200 in work-study, which doesn't even cover books for half a semester. It is difficult to apply for school, when you can't even pay your rent!

    --
    Zhrodague.net - I do projects and stuff too.
    1. Re:I want to go to college too! by LibertineR · · Score: 5, Insightful
      I call Bullshit.

      What state do you live in? In most states, if you spend two years at an ALMOST FREE Community College, you are granted automatic admission into a 4yr school. Do you have any idea how much Grant/Loan money for higher education goes un-used every year?

      I suggest you are not trying hard enough. Getting an education in America is easy, provided you are willing to work your ass off to get it done.

      Heard of Google? I suggest you get busy, or stop BS'ing us about how hard it is to pay for College. You are not trying hard enough. If you are in a situation where you cant, or can barely pay your rent, you can probably end up in a Community College FREE OF CHARGE. So, get on it.

  15. Re:Sad by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I hope you don't think you are in the majority. Most people don't even have jobs that have anything to do with their degree.

    Could have if they'd wanted. If you didn't want an overlap there, then no problem. I'm just bored with people whining about it and claiming college is worthless. It's worth what you put into it. If you get nothing out, well, that should say something.

    Education, learning, and knowledge can't be spoon fed. Just made available.

  16. An obvious piece of advocacy journalism. by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What we have here is an obvious piece of advocacy journalism:

    - Over four pages of coverage of an extrordinary accomplishment by four extraordiarily talented and hard-working undocumented immigrant children.

    - Most of the fifth page lamenting their financial handicap and plugging a particular federal bill to give MILLIONS of illegal-immigrant children a place at the federal tit and an entitlement to further boost the drain on the taxpayers pocketbooks - with a hefty chunk of the cashflow siphoned off to pay for more beaucrats.

    - A copule sentences on how such a program would rip college opportunities out of the hands of other children who are citizens - whose parents are already being taxed - sometimes into poverty - to pay for the institutions and scholarships that would be transferred to the illegals.

    Yes it stinks for the kids who built the 'bot - and others like them. But how many similar stories DIDN'T get told about rural-poor US citizen kids who performed similar feats, with similar lack of resources?

    It's NOT rare. For starters, if you hang out at NASA for any length of time you'll notice that a LOT of "rocket scientists" are from such backgrounds. Many have such stories to tell. (And in NASA's heyday the educational opporiunities for a kid who was rural, southern, or (horrors!) both were comparable to those of these kids.)

    Creating a new entitlement program will redistribute the resources differently but not increase them overall. Further, with the mismanagement and overhead typical of government programs, it's likely to destroy far more opportunities than it creates.

    Children who are US citizens are already at a signficant disadvantage to immigrants and student-visa holders. The latter tend to get financial aid as grants - even if they are children of the rich - while the former are left with mostly loans which must be paid off at interest or suplemented by low-paid jobs that take time from study. Tuition has become so astronomical that in many fields the citizens are just dropping out, as the lifetime benefit of the education is exceeded by its unsubsidized cost.

    Are we to believe that these four are typical, rather than extrordinary? (There are extrordinary individuals in all large populations.) Are we to believe the children of illegal immigrants are so much MORE competent than the children of citizens that more good than harm will come from from transferring educational opportunites from the latter to the former, dropping a bunch of them through the cracks on the way?

    In order to press for a government solution, the story carefully ignores (except to belittle in passing) private sector aid. There are an enormous number of private scholarship programs and private charatable foundations with scholarship programs, with an explosion of criteria for who they will help. (The tax system makes it profitable to create them, and has for decades. And people whos story is like that of these kids who finally make it often create leg-up funds for others like themselves.) They're not well known. But for kids with track records like these there are likely to be hundreds of them that might fund them through school.

    IMHO the real tragedy here is that the educational institution (with the gleeful aid of the media) did NOT help these kids dig up private funding. Instead it left them in low-paying jobs and is using their plight to push for legislation to feather its own nest.

    Meanwhile, the MIT administration really ought to be busting their butts to dig up scholarship money for these kids. (Especially if they remember what the Model Railroad Club wrought.) Four children of migrant workers who, while still in highschool, beat their team with $800 to buy balloons, tampons, and PVC pipe should be the star recruits for their next freshman class.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way