Slashdot Mirror
PearPC Trying to Sue CherryOS
Varg Vikernes writes "PearPC developers are taking in donations to sue Maui X-Stream, the developers of the MAC emulator software CherryOS. There have been allegations that CherryOS is nothing more than PearPC code, which is open-source, but with a GUI attached to it. One of the PearPC developers tried to get in contact with someone from Maui X-Stream, but eventually were told to "speak with an Attorney" about the allegations. "
fp?
You know I've mentioned this before but always get modded down, finally it looks like there are some sane moderators around.
Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
Milli Vanilli?
Seriously? How did he get that in without getting beaten to the first post?
The RIAA with their sue-grandma stories sure look like they're really a bunch of jerks.
Get real. You've fallen for the Slashdot propaganda.
Yeah, when you get a list of IPs and go through them, chances are someone's grandma's computer was used. They settled the lawsuit, and it was a non-story.
Expect on Slashdot, of course, where the RIAA is demonized to justify ripping off artists. Notice the artists you're ripping off aren't mentioned in your post? You know, those guys who willingly signed with their record labels?
You're basically admitting that Slashdot is biased.
Get real. You've fallen for the Slashdot propaganda.
No, I paraphrased the "slashdot propaganda". But it's not just slashdot's propaganda, these stories have appeared on other websites, newspaers, etc.
Again, this is not my view, but it is factual that these stories were broadly dissemenated.
Also, I don't give two hoots if slashdot was biased. Someone raised an issue as if they were pointing out hypocracy, when it's really quite consistent simple human behavior.
-josh
Wow, links to +5 comments on Slashdot that agree with your position? Talk about objective evidence! :)
No, links to +5 comments on Slashdot that agree with your position that there shouldn't be a double-standard.
Hence, you complaining that posts of this nature get modded down is simply a false.
But thanks for intentionally misunderstanding me, typical troll tactic to avoid responding to a point. I shouldn't have expected anything else.
What makes me a "troll" is the fact you disagree with me
Actually, I've submitted a few of those +5 comments saying that there shouldn't be a double-standard. What I disagree with is your lies.
Need proof? My post is no longer at +4.
That's on account of the lies, not the statement that there shouldn't be a double-standard.
What makes you a troll is that you only post this kind of garbage in order to get a ton of replies--that and the fact that you seem to think that you are some kind of authority on the subject. You're totally incapable of changing your position, you enjoy the attention and you keep posting the same refuted points over and over again and that is what makes you a troll.
If you're ridiculed (or demonized in your parlance) for espousing a point of view as God's own truth in the face of mountains of opposing evidence that's your problem. Painting yourself as a victim of some monolothic Slashdot Thought Police just makes you look pathetic.
Nice try though.
the fruit sues YOU!