Slashdot Mirror


GUIs Sorted By Icons

Ant writes "Blue's News posted an interesting link that shows a chart of icons from various interfaces. Clicking on graphical user interface (GUI) names, section names, or icons themselves will lead to the appropriate page with more details."

27 comments

  1. SGI 4dwm? by orangesquid · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Where's SGI? 4dwm always had some neat icons and other GUI elements.

    --
    --TheOrangeSquid Is it any wonder things seem so awry? We swim in a sea of confusion and don't have to think to survive
  2. This really needs a mirror by FidelCatsro · · Score: 2, Informative

    http://www.aci.com.pl.nyud.net:8090/mwichary/guide book/icons/components
    the site is suffering as it is and there is only one comment , i did attempt a coral cach but its timming out already.
    Its a shame as this looked rather intresting , It is a good example of when to use
    a mirror in your submission

    --
    The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
  3. what first by GtKincaid · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Do we complain about the Dupe or the fact that the story does not have a mirror

    1. Re:what first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rude to reply to myself , but Offtopic my arse . This story is both a dupe 3 time and the site is flooded

  4. third times a charm? by bdigit · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is the third time this article has been posted on slashdot

    http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/03/23/144224 5&tid=189&tid=152/

    http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/03/22/144223 0/

    All in march too and within 10 days. Weird eh?

    1. Re:third times a charm? by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      Good thing they reposted it I missed it the first two times.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    2. Re:third times a charm? by BrynM · · Score: 5, Funny
      • Time spent doing large HTML chard: 14 hours
      • Price per month of web hosting: $20
      • Cost of client usage/bandwidth spike for past ten days: $380
      • Having your geek cred estabilished by not just being slashdotted, but being a dupe twice: Priceless
      Some charts and graphs never get seen. For the ones that do something special, there's Slashdot. Accepted in large violent spikes of page views everywhere.
      --
      US Democracy:The best person for the job (among These pre-selected choices...)
    3. Re:third times a charm? by FLEB · · Score: 2, Funny

      So it's a "tripe"?

      --
      Information wants to be free.
      Entertainment wants to be paid.
      You just want to be cheap.
    4. Re:third times a charm? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I even emailed the editors (@ the Daddypants address) and pointed out this was a duplicate article when it was still in the Subscriber's-only queue.

      I wonder why Daddypants didn't remove it... if they actually used that feature there would be fewer embarassing mistakes.

  5. Apparently not. by smittyoneeach · · Score: 1

    The Ion desktop icons still didn't make it. Oh, wait...

    --
    Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
  6. All too often... by madaxe42 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Is the word 'Dupe!' thrown around. I'd actually like everybody to consider the fact that, while this is a very similar article to the one we saw a few days ago, linking to the same site, it is not a duplicate! The duplicate was posted last week, as a result of CmdrTaco's brand spanking new time machine.

    Hopefully we'll see an article on apple's takeover of microsoft last week.

    1. Re:All too often... by daeley · · Score: 2, Funny
      Hopefully we'll see an article on apple's takeover of microsoft last week.

      I hate to be a temporal grammar nazi, but that really should be:


      "Hopefully we will have had been be-seeing an article on Apple's overtakenage of Microsoft nexting week last."

      ;)

      --
      I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate.
  7. Woohoo! Someone mentioned GEOS!! by jbarr · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Oh, the memories from my college days...

    ...Booting up GEOS on a Commodore 64 and controlling things with a joystick...

    ...Downloading a 70 page programming manual off of Quantum Link at 300 baud...

    ...Printing out the document on a Star Gemini 10X dot-matrix printer...

    ...Being active on dial-up BBS's...

    My, how times have changed!

    GEOS was an amazing system, and the port to 8088 machines was most welcome. It ran on my Casio Zoomer PDA (pre-Palm days), and on my old Hyundai XT computer. Being overshadowed by Microsoft Windows, it's too bad Geoworks never really did anything with it.

    --
    My mom always said, "Jim, you're 1 in a million." Given the current population, there are 7000 of me. God help us all!
    1. Re:Woohoo! Someone mentioned GEOS!! by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      When I looked into it, their development package didn't encourage garage developers: Expensive and needed a Sun workstation (more $$$).

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  8. It does have one benefit. by Inoshiro · · Score: 1

    Timothy didn't post it to the main page. This means that I didn't have to deal with the site not working, like last time it was posted.

    It was down for a good few days :o

    --
    --
    Internet Explorer (n): Another bug -- that is, a feature that can't be turned off -- in Windows.
    1. Re:It does have one benefit. by Sparr0 · · Score: 1

      what is this 'main page' that you speak of?

  9. Hopping Mad by triso · · Score: 1

    Yes, I'm hopping mad. This topic is now on its third viewing over the past few weeks and the author still refuses to add MS-DOS and CP/M icons to the list. What is the world coming to?

    1. Re:Hopping Mad by Tablizer · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yes, I'm hopping mad. This topic is now on its third viewing over the past few weeks and the author still refuses to add MS-DOS and CP/M icons to the list. What is the world coming to?

      Here ya go:

      DIR
      RUN
      ERASE
      CD
      EJECT
      PRINT
      RUN PAINT.EXE
      TIME
      SYS

  10. NeXT icons by stevedekorte · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Many of the NeXTstep icons appear to be incorrect. Perhaps they were taken from GNUstep instead?

  11. Windows was that ugly for a reason... by bergeron76 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There's actually a good reason that Windows 1.0 and Windows 2.03 were so ugly on a color monitor. It's because back then, most displays were Hercules Monochrome or CGA. They displayed "shades" of amber or green, and that color scheme actually looks decent on those monitors.

    I have Windows 2.0 on 5.25" Floppy's, somewhere. I should probably resurrect them, and put them on VMWare or something for archival purposes.

    I may have to use an 8088 emulator or something similar to get it to run right. VMware might be overkill.

    I don't think I'll be able to resurrect that old Hercules Monitor (or the IBM XT) though. Man, I miss those days - XTree Pro, TheDraw, etc. Ascii used to be "cool"!

    --
    Don't think that a small group of dedicated individuals can't change the world. It's the only thing that ever has.
    1. Re:Windows was that ugly for a reason... by Lars+T. · · Score: 1

      Hercules was two shades only, dark and bright.

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    2. Re:Windows was that ugly for a reason... by nickos · · Score: 1

      I tried a couple of times to get Windows 1.0 to run on a modern PC but didn't have any luck. It would have been interesting to see how it handled tiled windows (IIRC they were scared of Apple suing them if they used overlapping windows).

      If anyone knows anymore about getting it to work or what it was like to use I'd love to hear it...

    3. Re:Windows was that ugly for a reason... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I'll be here later when I get points to pay you back for that overrated.

      --You know who.