Slashdot Mirror


Robotic Nanotech Swarms on Mars... in 2034

Roland Piquepaille writes "NASA is testing a shape-shifting robot called 'TETwalker' for tetrahedral walker, because it looks like a flexible pyramid. It has been tested in the lab and at the McMurdo station in Antarctica to test it under conditions more like those on Mars. Now, it is on the way to be -- really -- miniaturized by using micro- and nano-electro-mechanical systems. These robots will eventually join together to form 'autonomous nanotechnology swarms' (ANTS). When it's done, in about thirty years, these nanotech swarms will 'alter their shape to flow over rocky terrain or to create useful structures like communications antennae and solar sails.' So in 2034, nanotechnology will land on Mars. Read more for other details and references about the TETwalker and the ANTS project."

19 of 295 comments (clear)

  1. Sounds like a good movie idea. by Mortlath · · Score: 5, Funny
    I can see Hollywood making a movie out of this idea:

    "NASA's nano-robots get out of control and take over Mars. The robots replicate and build a massive robot army with the intent to come back to Earth and kill us all."

    What I wonder is why robots in movies usually feel the need to kill humankind?

  2. Oh noes #2! by dauthur · · Score: 4, Funny

    I don't know about these ant things... arm them with just a nanoliter of Cyanide, and you've got one Hell of a pack of fire ants.

  3. Reproduction? by pomegranatesix · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Will they have the ability to reproduce themselves?

    After the initial exploring and scientific investigations - we could have other uses for the nanobots.

    It'd be pretty cool if they could spread all over Mars and begin terraforming.

    We could have different "species" of nanobots - ones to fix nitrogen, another to break down CO2 into O2, etc etc. Mars would be livable in a couple hundred/thousand years.

    1. Re:Reproduction? by RecycledElectrons · · Score: 4, Insightful

      > We could have different "species" of
      > nanobots - ones to fix nitrogen,
      > another to break down CO2 into O2,
      > etc etc.

      We've already got those species - they are called bacteria.

      Andy Out!

    2. Re:Reproduction? by gwydion04 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Could be a bad idea... don't forget the concept of "Grey Goo".

  4. Re:Heh. by CrazyJim1 · · Score: 4, Funny

    "It's difficult to tell from this vantage point whether they will consume the captive earth men or merely enslave them. One thing is for certain: there is no stopping them; the ants will soon be here. And I for one welcome our new insect overlords. I'd like to remind them that as a trusted TV personality, I can be helpful in rounding up others to toil in their underground sugar caves."

  5. Link to the TETwalker by scdeimos · · Score: 5, Informative
  6. Roland Piquepaille article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Click and make him feel cool.

  7. No by bonch · · Score: 5, Funny

    They want to send nanotechnology swarms onto another planet in order to burrow into the core and create a vast nanotech brain. The planet will gain self-awareness in a matter of seven years and will decide humanity is its greatest threat, altering the course of its orbit to crash into Earth.

    All brought to you by NASA. Thanks, NASA!

  8. Why do I get the feeling... by TrumpetPower! · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...that we're currently experiencing a ROLAND PIQUEPAILLE swarm?

    Cheers,

    b&

    --
    All but God can prove this sentence true.
  9. The news in 2034 by rhysweatherley · · Score: 5, Funny

    "NASA scientists were red-faced today when their nanotech swarms crashed and refused to move anywhere. One scientist was heard to mutter something about 'Damn 32-bit time_t'".

  10. Roland by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Wish there was a way to mark Roland articles so we could omit them and deny him his precious ad revenue.

    --
    Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
  11. NASA's ANTS webpage by karvind · · Score: 4, Informative

    Here. The page has more details and link to movies.

  12. Robotic robots from Mars! by AtariAmarok · · Score: 4, Funny
    "by a huge artificial AI comes back to Earth"

    It is those artificial AI intelligences that I fear the most, I tell ya.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  13. Re:Whoa! by NanoGator · · Score: 4, Funny

    "We can barely handle environmental damage here. Now you want to send nanotechnology "swarms" onto another planet because... we'll learn a whole lot?!"

    You'd rather they unleash them here?

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  14. Oh hell... by WoodSmoke · · Score: 4, Funny

    Great, someone went and invented replicators.... we are screwed, SG1 would probably be too busy to save us...

  15. Re:So lets see what happens ... by Karl+Tacheron · · Score: 5, Funny
    A 100 years later a huge fleet of warships from Mars controlled by a huge artificial AI comes back to Earth and obliterates it.
    Powered by a double redundancy drive?
  16. Bypass Roland Piquepaille by elronxenu · · Score: 4, Informative

    The relevant original links:
    Here and Here.

  17. Re:Let me give you some statistics... by Leeji · · Score: 4, Informative

    What is the concern with this blog? It's the absolute dearth of original information.

    Let's look at the composition of a few recent blog entries, in characters:

    Entry Excerpts Link Wrapper Self-written
    Nanotech Swarms 2280 910 670
    Nano-Probes 2185 767 1053
    Toilets 1206 787 1006

    Note that most of the "self-written" portions are vapid statements such as "But where is nanotechnology involved in this project?"

    So, we have 52% of the text coming from plagiarism, ~ 23% of the text coming from introducing / pointing out links, and ~ %25% of the text coming from saying the obvious. That's the problem with the blog.

    The technique used on the site is barely better than the spam search engines that link to (and excerpt from) Wikipedia.

    --
    It all goes downhill from first post ...