Ruby On Rails Showdown with Java Spring/Hibernate
Paradox writes "Java developer Justin Gehtland recently tried re-implementing one of his web applications in Ruby on Rails instead of his normal Java Spring/Hibernate setup. His analysis of overall performance and application size was startling, to say the least. The Java app's configuration alone was nearly the size of the entire Rails codebase, and Rails application was significantly (15%-30%) faster! At the same time, the Ruby community is abuzz because Ruby is getting a new optimized bytecode compiler for its upcoming 2.0 release. Will Ruby on Rails become even faster as a result?"
...Ruby is getting a new optimized bytecode compiler for its upcoming 2.0 release. Will Ruby on Rails become even faster as a result?
I would assume so, doesn't optimized usually mean faster?
doesn't optimized usually mean faster?
I'd give you an answer, but I haven't been able to fully test out my optimized Gentoo box yet -- it's still compiling.
Just watch, it's impossible to have an intelligent discussion between the two groups.
Is that so, Mr. Poopyhead?
Fifteen to thirty percent faster, and still crushed under the load of Slashdot.
-- This sig is only a test. If this were a real sig it would say something witty. --
First post!
--
Posted Via JFPB - Java First Post Bot
lexbaby
"Be Brave, Be Loyal, Be True." -- Hawkeye Pierce
There is nothing easier to scale then webapps in the world.
Yes there is. Writing shakespeare. Just add more monkeys and more typewriters.