Slashdot Mirror


CherryOS Goes Open Source

netsniper writes "The CherryOS website now acknowledges a forthcoming alliance with Open Source Software! After going 'on hold' recently, a re-release of CherryOS is purported to be coming in May according to the site. This is great news on the surface, but let's see how it pans out. This move is probably a result of the many reviews of their product that set out to prove it was bogus."

16 of 370 comments (clear)

  1. So I guess this means.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    ..that they are popping their Cherry?

  2. oh please by eobanb · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Oh please. Can this whole shenanigan just end already? By now, it's already been proven beyond any reasonable doubt that CherryOS is a repackaged version of PearPC (google for "spiro multimax 3000"). Arben and MXS are using absolutely any tactic to get attention. He must have a serious ego problem.

    --

    Take off every sig. For great justice.

  3. It's Easy by CypherXero · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's easy. All they had to do in order to avoid all the bad press is to start out with it being Open Source. The GPL states that you can charge for a product, or do whatever you like with it, just as long as your provide the source code. And if you use source code from another project (PearPC), then you have to acknowledge it.

    It was so simple and easy, I don't know why they didn't Open Source Cherry OS from the begining.

    1. Re:It's Easy by mikepaktinat · · Score: 5, Informative
      And if you use source code from another project (PearPC), then you have to acknowledge it.

      The problem being that the developer has sworn up and down that he used none of the PearPC code.
    2. Re:It's Easy by Chris+Kamel · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Probably because they thought they'd get away with it. Developers tend to think that noone will understand a thing in the inner workings of their applications as long as they protect the sourcecode.

      --
      The following statement is true
      The preceding statement is false
    3. Re:It's Easy by jb.hl.com · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Hence why 'selling' a 100% GPL product is never going to be a wise business move.

      Which is why Red Hat crashed and burned all those years ago.

      Obviously.

      --
      By summer it was all gone...now shesmovedon. --
  4. how lies work... by jhealy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    If your friend lies to you, and then comes clean... you maybe forgive them, but you never really respect them all that much, because you know they can lie to your face.
    CherryOS will never look that cool to any of us, because they only came clean because of being caught in a lie.

  5. "Due to overwhelming demand" by BabyDave · · Score: 5, Funny

    s/demand/threats of legal action/

    It would be funny if the OSS release proved that it wasn't a rip-off of PearPC. Unlikely, but funny.

  6. Still violating GPL? by The+New+Andy · · Score: 5, Insightful
    From the GPL:

    4. You may not copy, modify, sublicense, or distribute the Program except as expressly provided under this License. Any attempt otherwise to copy, modify, sublicense or distribute the Program is void, and will automatically terminate your rights under this License. However, parties who have received copies, or rights, from you under this License will not have their licenses terminated so long as such parties remain in full compliance.

    Does this mean that CherryOS has already lost their license to use the source code from PearPC?

  7. Its too late for this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    The developer of the Altivec emulation (the one who was collecting money for a lawsuit) has already revoked their rights to his code. Even if they try to open source they still have problems as they are now dealing with copyrighted code.

  8. Thank you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I for one wish to thank CherryOS developers for being so generous to give the fruits of their so hard work to the community.

  9. Re:Ummm... by rpozz · · Score: 5, Interesting

    There were some absolute bastards who registered azureus.org a while ago (seems to have changed now), and offered a version of Azureus which came bundled with spyware. Hopefully this sort of practice of exploiting free/open software doesn't become too popular.

  10. Ah, the master plan to open source Windows! by ardor · · Score: 5, Funny

    This move is probably a result of the many reviews of their product that set out to prove it was bogus.

    1. Say Windows XP/Longhorn is bogus
    2. Wait for them to release it as Open Source
    3. ???
    4. Profit!!!

    --
    This sig does not contain any SCO code.
  11. It's always been open source by Anita+Coney · · Score: 5, Funny

    They're only admitting it now.

    --
    If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
  12. copyright infingment != theft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How can you steal it. They only copied and modified the source, no theft here.

    Move along, the parent is nothing but a TROLL!

  13. Re:A charitable view... by saddino · · Score: 5, Informative

    That was my initial impression as well, but that is clearly not the case. As the developer, Arben Kryesiu has been extremely vocal about his "creation" of CherryOS and has granted many interviews proudly describing his "inspiration" to write CherryOS -- hardly a "fly-by-night" developer who got caught up in a lie and skipped town after delivering a bogus product.

    The "company" that owns CherryOS, Maui-X Stream, has the following in their bio:

    Jim Kartes is the president of Maui-X Stream. He and Arben Kryesiu started the company in the winter of 2003.

    So, this publicity hounding "developer" is a also co-founder of the company, and hence: the company is not an innocent player in all of this.