Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Daylight Savings Change Proposed

Posted by CmdrTaco on from the time-to-patch-some-code dept.

AveryRegier writes "CNN is reporting that Congress has added an amendment to the Energy Bill to extend daylight-savings time by two months. They expect to "save the equivalent of 10,000 barrels of oil a day." How long it would take for the associated energy savings to overcome the cost to make, test, and deploy the necessary code changes? How would the cost of this change compare with Y2K? Does most date routines' reliance on GMT make this just an issue of presenting the right time to the user?"

3 of 1,392 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Why not go to DST permanently? by Storlek · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Hmm... I'm no expert in this field, but isn't "midnight" the middle of the night?

    --
    Bears don't normally eat things that talk and move backwards.
  2. Re:Why not go to DST permanently? by TheRealMindChild · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    The same way that a Hamburger is made of ham...

    --

    "When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade. Make life take the lemons back!" -- Cave Johnson
  3. Re:Why not go to DST permanently? by Storlek · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    The same way that a Hamburger is made of ham...

    <pedantic> The hamburger got its name because it originated in Hamburg, Germany. Unless time was invented in some town called Midnight, your analogy falls on its face. :) </pedantic>

    --
    Bears don't normally eat things that talk and move backwards.