Daylight Savings Change Proposed
AveryRegier writes "CNN is reporting that Congress has added an amendment to the Energy Bill to extend daylight-savings time by two months. They expect to "save the equivalent of 10,000 barrels of oil a day." How long it would take for the associated energy savings to overcome the cost to make, test, and deploy the necessary code changes? How would the cost of this change compare with Y2K? Does most date routines' reliance on GMT make this just an issue of presenting the right time to the user?"
Enemy combatant at the very least.
Your either with us or against us. Your question indicates that you are definitely against us.
That's the tradeoff of being an hourly vs. salaried person. Since I'm Excempt, and get no overtime, I'm not on the clock.
> How would the cost of this change compare with Y2K?
Next to nothing. All the work has already been done to accomodate Summer Time changes worldwide:
ftp://elsie.nci.nih.gov/pub/
Almost every *ix flavor already does the right thing. Change a data file and you're done
Hmm... I'm no expert in this field, but isn't "midnight" the middle of the night?
Bears don't normally eat things that talk and move backwards.
The same way that a Hamburger is made of ham...
"When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade. Make life take the lemons back!" -- Cave Johnson
Umm, World War II was from September 1939...
Oolite: Elite-like game. For Mac, Linux and Windows
The same way that a Hamburger is made of ham...
:) </pedantic>
<pedantic> The hamburger got its name because it originated in Hamburg, Germany. Unless time was invented in some town called Midnight, your analogy falls on its face.
Bears don't normally eat things that talk and move backwards.