Slashdot Mirror


Spammer Sentenced to 9 Years in Jail

Iphtashu Fitz writes "Jeremy Jaynes of Raleigh, NC now has the dubious honor of being the first spammer sentenced to jail for the felony of spamming. Virginia judge Thomas Horne sentenced Jaynes to 9 years in prison based on a jury recommendation after he was convicted of sending out 10 million e-mails a day. Jaynes, who sent out much of his spam using the name "Gaven Stubberfield", has held a position on the SpamHaus Registry of Known Spam Operations for a long time. Unfortunately the sentence has been postponed while the case is being appealed." Commentary on the sentence available at Forbes as well.

12 of 565 comments (clear)

  1. Heh heh... by FlyByPC · · Score: 5, Funny

    Spam in the can, anyone?

    --
    Paleotechnologist and connoisseur of pretty shiny things.
  2. What makes this guy different? by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I didn't RTFA. For the benefit of cretins like me, would someone explain what was special about his case that warranted that sentence? Why is he headed to prison when so many other spammers aren't?

    Unfortunately the sentence has been postponed while the case is being appealed.

    Um, I know we hate spammers, but isn't that how the system is supposed to work so that people have every chance possible to prove their innocence?

    Still, the temptation to make a ironic Viagra spam joke here is pretty strong.

    --
    Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
  3. Spammer Sentenced to 9 Years in Jail by chrisnewbie · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Damn that's long He should have killed someone or rob a bank, they would have sentenced him for less

  4. Re:good move by tdemark · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's not that I think 9 years is too long or too short, it's that I think it's not in line with other punishments.

    You could commit a murder and probably get a similar sentence, if not shorter.

    It really says something about society when you can get a harsher penalty for sending spam than you could for premeditated homicide.

    - Tony

  5. Jail by XFilesFMDS1013 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Bet he's sorry now htat he sent those penis enlargement pill e-mails to incarcerated felons.

  6. Re:good move by JavaLord · · Score: 5, Insightful

    9 years too long? i don't think so

    Consider the fact that here in New Jersey, a Rapist gets out in 3 years with good behavior. (They don't even call it rape here, it's 'sexual assault')

    His crime was not a violent one, he shouldn't go to jail for 9 years. He should have to pay an insane fine, and be barred from going online for 10-20 years and give him 10 years probation. If he violates any of this, throw him in jail.

    It's silly to throw someone in jail in a country where we already have an overcrowded jail system.

    This man was simply a victim of being made an example of. There is no doubt that he should be punished, but 9 years in jail for a crime that just annoyed victims is a bit much. I'd much rather see rapists and murders get 20-40 years and let people like this get probation and fines. It's a waste of resources to lock someone like this up.

  7. Isn't This Too Much? by Caraig · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Granted, we all hate spammers. We hate what they do, we hate the way they zombify unsecured gateways, we hate they way they thumb their nose at everyone, we hate what they try to sell, we hate that they try to scam millions a day. We all would love to see every spammer get harsh penalties.

    But, really... nine years?

    Isn't that a bit much? He won't be serving all that time, of course, but it's a lot of time for spamming.

    Wouldn't a better punishment be somethign vaguely like what they did to Mitnick? Forbid the guy from holding any sort of computer-related occupation for ten years. No computer for more than recreational purposes -- oh, heck, he doesn't need to play HL2, no computer at all. No opportunity to spam, and he'll have to make it or break it in a real job (for values of 'real job' which do not include 'IT jobs.') If he's smart, he can do office clerk work, maybe work his way up to office manager (he just can't work anywhere where the office manager also has to manage the computer system.) If he can't hack that, he goes into fastfood or retail. And if he absolutely can't make a living doing something other than spamming... ladies and gentlemen, we have here a dysfunctional human being.

    Compared to Mitnick, he'll still be getting off easy. But it makes a lot more sense than nine years in jail. And the taxpayers aren't paying for his stay in the slam.

    And if you want to get really creative, have him subscribed to every junk mail list in existence... with no opt-out.

    I don't know, it just seems like nine years is ridiculous when we don't even put away physically violent felons for that long.

    --
    "I am an Adept of Tantric VAX."
  8. Re:good move by pilgrim23 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I totally agree. 9 years is a horrible sentence for spamming. We should be more caring more, sensitive, more in touch with our inner fetus....

    -get a rope......

    --
    - Minutus cantorum, minutus balorum, minutus carborata descendum pantorum.
  9. Re:Thoughts... by siliconjunkie · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Keep in mind that this guy was not just "being a mass annoyance", he was defrauding 10,000 to 17,000 individuals a month selling a "FedEx refund processor" that promised $75-an-hour work but did little more than give buyers access to a Web site of delinquent FedEx accounts.

    This guy made $750K per month defrauding people with his sham product, so before you say "wow! 9 for just spamming, realize that spoofing email headers was just his mechanism for delivering his con game to millions of people per day in order to take advantage of that "sucker born every minute" that falls for get rich quick schemes that require them to send $30 to "find out how they can get rich quick with FedEx refunds".

    I don't feel sorry for this criminal. Considering the guy will be out in 3 years with good behavior, I think the punishment is a fine fit for the crimes this man commited.

    Then again, my /. sig (usually) points to a SpamVampire script designed to run up spammer's bandwidth bills, so I suppose you may want to take everything I say with a grain of salt, as I really don't like spammers.

  10. Re:aside from the Viagra+don't drop the soap jokes by stratjakt · · Score: 5, Interesting

    There's a suit in the courts seeking to overhaul the entire justice system, based on the premise of cruel and unusual punishment. I'm not sure how it's going, frankly I hope they win.

    Everyone in the Dept. of Corrections knows about the constant rape and torture of inmates, by inmates, and yet have done little to fix the problem in a century.

    Sentencing someone to rape is cruel and unusual by any stretch of the term.

    At any rate, prison makes bad people worse. There are dangers to society that need to be locked away, but the attitude of "throw everyone in for everything" is really warped. In my state, it's a manditory 10 years for being busted for anything drug related within 5 miles of a school. Get out a map of your city or town - unless you're way out on the farm, EVERYONE lives within 5 miles of a school. Erego, every college kid busted with a half a doobie gets his life ruined.

    And then theres the practice of civil forfeiture, a great way to get around the constitutional protection to be able to refuse to testify against your spouse. "Mrs Malda, either you testify that Rob was selling crack to 6 year olds, or we take your home, car, all your money, and then put your kids into protective custody so you'll never see them again"

    Cheer all you want about this, slashbots, this just sets a precedent for when you're in front of a Judge for downloading those Metallica mp3s. After all, a computer crime is computer crime to a clueless jury. Hell, the DMCA calls for even stiffer penalties than this, should you dare modify that PS2 to play copied titles.

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
  11. Re:good move by sTalking_Goat · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I agree. I hate SPAM as much as the next guy but it makes me nervous when non-violent, especially computer related crimes, start having hefty sentences. A good deal of the outcome of trial has to do with previous cases.

    If a prosecutor in the future can link Joe Spammer and Tom Bittorent user somehow and Joe spammer got 9 years, what do you think Tom's chances are?

    --

    My days of not taking you seriously are certainly coming to a middle...

  12. Re:good move by sakshale · · Score: 5, Insightful
    It really says something about society when you can get a harsher penalty for sending spam than you could for premeditated homicide.
    I suspect that society would be better off if it used community service and financial penalties instead of jail time for nonviolent crimes. As much as I dislike SPAM and SPAMMERS, nine years in jail just doesn't feel correct to me.
    --
    For every problem there is a solution that is simple, obvious and wrong.