Slashdot Mirror


Router Built for Gamers

VL writes "Ping times suck? Too much lag? If your loved ones are hogging all your bandwidth with P2P and torrents, you'll want to check out the D-Link DGL-4300 Wireless 108G Gaming Router. This is a router designed for gamers that also happens to be a great router for regular folks."

11 of 374 comments (clear)

  1. Overpriced by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    $120? What makes this router so special? In fact, what the heck IS a gaming router? My $20 Netgear wireless router with logging and access control works fine and it's $100 less. It might not have glowing blue lights and make a front page Slashvertisement, but it works fine for me.

    1. Re:Overpriced by andreyw · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Reconsider your strategy when dealing with Tech Support.

      As far as they care -
      1) You /don't/ run Linux. Only Windows XP with the latest and greatest service packs.
      2) You /don't/ only have one computer where the problem manifests itself. In fact you have 10 - you're a small business.
      3) The problem /doesn't/ occasionally happen. It happens all the time.

      Basically [-
      a) Tell them you conform to hw/sw requirements so that they actually help you instead of hanging up.
      b) Over-exaggerate the problem.

    2. Re:Overpriced by JaF893 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I would like to know where you can get a $20 router with:
      1. Up to 108Mbps* 802.11g Wireless Connectivity.
      2. 4 Gigabit Ethernet Ports.
      Yes, it is overpriced but have you even read TFA?

    3. Re:Overpriced by Retric · · Score: 5, Insightful

      As a gamer I must say it's not the minimum ping time that makes a difference but the maximum av ping time. I don't care if 1/2 the packets get there in 25ms if 5% of the time they're timing out then most games are not playable.

      As most games are fairly low bandwidth there is little advantage to going past 100kb/s but cutting 100kb/s out of a 786kb pipe shared with 3 people can take a 40-120ms ping and drop it into a 42- 60ms ping. Now if your not sharing your pipe with anyone then it's not a big deal but if you want to let people use bit torrent while getting a good av ping time then traffic shaping really helps out.

      Yes, it reduces your total bandwidth a little and adds a little overhead, which is not always needed, but if it means you can leave BT on 24/7 while your roommates are AIMing and surfing the web then it's a net win.

    4. Re:Overpriced by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "I wonder what penalty is incurred by the packet inspection overhead? I betthings run better with a plain-jane nat router and NO filters or rules to slow things down.. "

      Not when some moron user forgets to set an upload cap on their BitTorrent/KaZaA/Blubster/etc client.

      Then your whole connection goes down the tubes unless you're running some sort of packet prioritization scheme.

      --
      retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
  2. Sounds like... by ajiva · · Score: 4, Insightful

    To me it just seems like a normal router with some fancy lights and colors and some QoS software built into the router (most other routers have QoS as well, at least the Linksys ones do). To me though, it doesn't seem all that interesting.

  3. Re:Ok, come on now. The submission is just the ad by ergo98 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    How lazy can you get?

    The submitter was obviously one of the ViperLair people, who are the people behind TFA.

    Really, though, Slashdot submissions should contain next to no information from TFA - invariably that just gives superficial material for the first post warriers to pretend they have some knowledge of TFA, when of course they never actually read it. Then the drovers of replies feed off of the incorrect information leading to some giant recursive loop of ignorance.

  4. No password, no SSL. by frostman · · Score: 5, Insightful

    According to TFA, this router comes with no password and also lets you get at the admin tools via http rather than https.

    OK, most routers are utterly insecure in their default configs, but for something relatively high-end I don't see why they don't require a password. (Not to mention the SSL bit, which is standard on my much older D-Link).

    It's not that hard. All you have to do is only allow access to the admin tools until a decent password has been set, and have a hardware reset button that gets you back to that state in case you forget your password.

    I suppose you could have an option for a completely open wireless network, but you'd want to require a few confirmation clicks with big fat warnings.

    Am I missing something? Is that really so hard?

    (And yes, I know people don't normally associate "high-end" with "D-Link" but hey, mine cost $30 and works just fine.)

    --

    This Like That - fun with words!

  5. Just an Ad by i-neo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's a shame to have an Ad article like that...
    If only it was something new. The only new thing is the marketing concept, the features are not.

    I hope not to see such kind of articles anymore on Slashdot.

    i-neo
    PS: Fortunately they'll be slashdotted ;)

  6. Score another one for gaming culture by Datamonstar · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's mainstream now, so expect these type of products hitting the market more and more in the near future. It's like video cards. There was a time when a video card didn't have to come with a flashy 3D collage on the box, but now, thanks to the mainstream culture, video cards have to look cool before they're even out of the box.
    And now that joe six pack is playing multiplayer games more and more we see routers and other gear that was once only found in the domain of the geek eeking their way onto the plates of the masses.
    It's not a bad thing, just something that happens every time something becomes popular. Companies try separating products for specialised tasks, even if the variance between these products is rather insignificant.

    --
    The eternal struggle of good vs. evil begins within one's self.
  7. Why wasn't this commercial post suppressed? by cyberhenge · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is a quote of the complete contents of the site it points to. It's a lame sales site without any further information. I had to Google the product name to get a different site where there were any product specs. This post is nothing but an advertisement for an advertisement. Maybe the product is worthwhile; if it is the poster should have sent us to a site that had something to say.