Slashdot Mirror
Judge Denies SCO's Ex Parte Motion to Adjourn
karvind writes "Groklaw has up an article stating that judge Kimball has issued an order regarding SCO's Ex Parte Motion to Adjourn the April 21, 2005 Argument on SCO's Motion to Amend Its Complaint: The Motion is denied. SCO has finally filed its 10Q." From the article: "The court declines to adjourn the hearing. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that SCO's Ex Parte Motion to Adjourn the April 21, 2005 Argument on SCO's Motion to Amend Its Complaint is DENIED. In addition to hearing SCO's Motion to Amend its Complaint and SCO's Motion to Compel the Deposition of Samuel Palmisano at the April 21, 2005 hearing, the parties are hereby NOTIFIED that the court will also hear argument regarding the parties' Proposed Scheduling Orders."
SCO has finally filed its 10Q.
You're Welcome.
"I'm not impatient. I just hate waiting." - My Dad
...what?
Irritable, left-wing and possibly humorous bumper stickers and t-shirts
Legal Speak! Can... no... understand... Brain Melting!
Therefore, I have no idea what you just said.
And, sadly, I read Groklaw too. D'oh!
pb Reply or e-mail; don't vaguely moderate.
Here comes the stampede of SlashDot "laywers"... each with their own [unfounded]
opinion of what the defendants, judge and attorneys handling the case should do.
It's better than subscribing to True Detective!
When does the SCO firesale start? Heck I bet an executive chair with Darl's buttprint on it might be a collectible item someday.
I Am My Own Worst Enemy
The lawyerspeak jargon seems to like to USE caps for verbs. Explanations DENIED. This Slashdot comment has so been POSTED. Thank you, thank you, I'll BE here all day...
You're right, I wouldn't steal a car. But if it were possible, I sure as hell would download one!
Judge Kimball may well ask SCO to eat their motion during oral arguments.
Comment removed based on user account deletion
Should read "Ex Pirate Motion."
Judge Kimball just goatse'd SCO!!
That's because without the lawsuit, their $0 of revenues minus their $0 of expenses equals $0 of profit.
http://www.google.com/search?lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8 &q=IANAL
Si vis pacem, para bellum! For evil to succeed good men need only do nothing!
now it's crystal clear: The court declines ta adjourn da hearing. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED dat SCO'sEx Parte Motion ta Adjourn da April 21, 2005 Argument on SCO'sMotion ta Amend Its Complaint iz DENIED. In addition ta hearing SCO'sMotion ta Amend its Complaint an' SCO'sMotion ta Compel da Deposition o' Samuel Palmisano at da April 21, 2005 hearing, da parties iz hereby NOTIFIED dat da court will also hear argument regarding da parties' Proposed Scheduling Orders and git Sheniquah's ass back ova' heeah.
I just hope we get to see Darl find out that PJ is really Old Man Jones who used to run the old fairgrounds. And to think... SCO would have gotten away with it, if it wasn't for that meddling PJ.
I haven't seen such gobbledy-gook since the gal I was stalking filed a court injunction against me.
Hey, I'm a simple, dumb MSEE here. How about reposting this thing using English, not Klingon.
It doesn't relate directly to the end of the trial. It just means that SCO's motion to further delay things was denied. It doesn't mean that SCO won't try other delay tactics, just that this particular tactic is dead.
It's kind of like putting a 6 year old to bed. They will kick and scream and fight to stay up as long as they can. They will find excuses to drag things on as long as they can in hopes that you will forget how late it is getting. Eventually though, they always end up going to sleep.
Thank *you*!
I tried putting it through babelfish, but apparently that doesn't work with legalese.
In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
My favourite part of the 10Q filing is in 10Qa, under "Other Assets".
It reads:
Goodwill: --As in, none left.
You can't trick me, I saw the research paper generator. I even learned a bit by reading some sample papers, however, this story reaks of randomly generated legal speak.
The man who trades freedom for security does not deserve nor will he ever receive either. - Benjamin Franklin
So, the court is sinking to shift an audition. This must mean Battleship, because in Battleship you sink things. That ought to Zusatzantrag SCO's joggle. I'm not sure this is clear enough. Let's get a few more languages' opinions:
Aha! With German, French, and Japanese combines, this appears to be a message... from the FUTURE! Unfortunately some information appears to have been lost, but from this it looks like the courthouse is gone ("As for the courthouse? [...] It goes."), perhaps from battleship? 2005 years in the future, on April 21st, SCO has given an order of some kind. An unknown entity, S (or "Thing S"), is involved. It seems a contract is involved, with a theory of some sort, and they're running from Samuel Palmisano (who has perhaps travelled into the future to take care of this). Unfortunately the last line is garbled, or we'd know exactly how many more people SCO intends to transmit from the future.
Stay tuned!
Don't think of it as a flame---it's more like an argument that does 3d6 fire damage
"All your case are belong to us!"