Slashdot Mirror


A 2nd Core to Keep Windows Chugging Along?

Eh-Wire writes "Almost every hardware junkie I know would give most anything to take a spin in the new dual core hot rods from Dell or one of the custom system builders. But what if you actually needed that second core to run your anti-virus, spyware detection software and firewall just to get a little gaming or Internet surfing done on the first core. Would that really be a good reason to bring home a shiny new machine? I can think of a couple of different things I could use a second core for but running an iron lung on it just to keep the machine chugging along just isn't one of them. Curiously enough, PCMag thinks that's a perfectly good reason."

26 of 659 comments (clear)

  1. Why don't we by ericdano · · Score: 3, Funny
    Port OS X 10.4 to the chip. Then on one core, run OS X, and the other Linux?

    Who wants to waste all that power running virus software? I don't get it.

    --
    It's either on the beat or off the beat, it's that easy.
    I moderate therefore I rule!
    --
    1. Re:Why don't we by RealityMogul · · Score: 2, Funny

      I think the point would be to run anti-virus software.

      Although, if virus writers would limit their CPU usage to just the second core, thus freeing up the first one, maybe people would stop bugging me about their system running so slowly.

    2. Re:Why don't we by RebelWithoutAClue · · Score: 2, Funny
      I know !!

      We'll just put a second hard disk on there to free up more resources !

      --
      "However beautiful the strategy, you should occasionally look at the results" - Winston Churchill
  2. Re:Yeah... by Saint+Aardvark · · Score: 5, Funny
    but there is so much bloat in the program because software vendors feel the need to use up all that extra processing juice that it does...

    ...said the person whose website is (nearly) all in flash...

  3. Spyware by Sweed · · Score: 4, Funny

    Yeah, Windows users need the second core to run all that spyware. It'll probably help a lot!

    1. Re:Spyware by jamesh · · Score: 3, Funny

      What we really need is a triple core cpu. One core to run the spyware. One to run software to try and counter the spyware. And one to actually do some useful work.

    2. Re:Spyware by Dachannien · · Score: 2, Funny

      And one to actually do some useful work.

      You mean you can use computers to do useful work?

      Huh. I guess you really do learn something new every day!

  4. Re:people make jokes about it but by Adult+film+producer · · Score: 2, Funny

    i'm sorry that should be

    http://anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/showdoc.aspx?i=23 89

    slashcode butchered that url.

  5. Dead homies by lostngone · · Score: 5, Funny

    One Core for me and one Core for all my dead homies.

  6. Re:people make jokes about it but by Adult+film+producer · · Score: 2, Funny

    wtf. *sigh*. nm

  7. Download the windows 2nd Core patch here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    http://www.getfirefox.com/

  8. Re:Yeah... by Kadin2048 · · Score: 4, Funny
    User: "So, uh, why did you decide to make a word processor that uses 80 megs of RAM and bogs down anything less than a 2 GHz machine?"
    Programmer: "Why? Why? Muahahha.... BECAUSE I CAN."


    Using more resources than necessary to complete a task doesn't demonstrate any sort of talent.

    --
    "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
  9. Re:Bloat? What do you know about bloat? by Knetzar · · Score: 4, Funny

    maybe it's just me, but I like having gaim start up when I login.

  10. Re:Yeah... by grolschie · · Score: 2, Funny

    To be fair, he does have an HTML only option for slower machines (not that you'll see anything useful there though). ;-)

  11. Re:Yeah... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Looking at the source to his HTML I see:

    * A whole bunch of keywords and an extra --!> that shouldn't be being displayed
    on screen, but actually is.
    * <meta name="GENERATOR" content="Microsoft FrontPage 4.0">

    Hmmm.... perhaps he should employ the services of an award winning website
    webdesign team? ;-)

  12. Re:Yeah... by happyemoticon · · Score: 3, Funny

    My word processor doesn't lag. I use emacs.

  13. Re:(nt)Konqueror will load it by croddy · · Score: 2, Funny

    so, file a bug report. sheesh!

  14. Re:Yeah... by ErichTheWebGuy · · Score: 4, Funny

    You've lost those 6 seconds forever... ah, you would have just wasted them anyway...

    You're right! And I wasted another 5 seconds reading your meaningless reply, and yet another 20 seconds writing this meaningless reply, in response to your meaningless reply (which clearly took you several minutes to come up with)! ! When will it all end?!?!

    --
    bash: rtfm: command not found
  15. Re:Yeah... by FidelCatsro · · Score: 2, Funny

    Oh it does , it demostraits the talent to buy shares of IBM/AMD/Intel with your wages then program a procesor hog so people upgrade *Cough conspiracy theory cough*

    --
    The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
  16. Re:Uh... by myukew · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'm writing this on a DOS Box you insensitive clod!

  17. Re:Bloat? What do you know about bloat? by JamesTRexx · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yes, it's just you.

    --
    home
  18. Re:Yeah... by JustOK · · Score: 2, Funny

    How many miles per bale of hay does your horse get?

    --
    rewriting history since 2109
  19. Re:Bloat? What do you know about bloat? by sydb · · Score: 3, Funny

    To what are you alluding? The meaning of your comment eludes me.

    --
    Yours Sincerely, Michael.
  20. Re:Yeah... by mattyrobinson69 · · Score: 2, Funny

    knowing your OS is nice an' all, but what do you wordprocess in? openoffice for emacs?

  21. Re:Yeah... by back_pages · · Score: 4, Funny
    Ah yes, words of wisdom!

    You should optimize the time of your optimization so that you optimize the effects of that optimization. Optimizing at an inopportune opportunity will result in an unoptimized optimization. Just remember to use your optimization optimizer to find the best opportunity to optimize!

    It's trivial, really. Hierarchial optimization is like SO basic. Don't forget to optimize your optimization optimizer! There's nothing more embarrassing than missing the optimum opportunity to optimize your code because your optimization optimizer took too long to execute!

  22. Re:Oh it's all going to hell... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    Please stop using the "we" word when talking about Apple. That job belongs to PR and marketing, would you like it if they started hacking on your code?

    -An Apple Employee