Canadians May Face 25% Download Tariff
C-Yo writes "While Canadians have battled against an iPod tariff for more than a
year, now comes news that Canada's copyright collectives are seeking a
tariff on iTunes as well. Professor
Michael Geist (who last
week dismantled music industry claims about peer-to-peer) reports
that one collective is demanding an incredible 25% of the gross revenue
of music download services as well as 15% of webcasters' gross revenue
and 10% of gamers gross revenue (free
version of report or Toronto
Star reg. version). When combined with other tariff
proposals, it would appear that Canada's collectives want to the kill
the download industry, demanding at least 40% of everything iTunes,
Napster, and other new services earn."
born and bread all I can say is AAAAHHHHahhahhhaaahha Socialism you gotta love it. Thank good I live in Arizona.
Si vis pacem, para bellum! For evil to succeed good men need only do nothing!
Wow! What is wrong with these Socialists? How in the world can they say to themselves, "OK, our citizens are LEGALLY paying for music, however, they are all theives, so we might as well tack on another 25%!".
If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land,
it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy. -James Madison
For those who don't keep track, Canada is currently (however not necessarily for much longer) ruled by a Minority government. Chances of any bill that smells even vaguely of Controversy is slim to nil. Now if the Conservative party should take control, it's time to move to a country where freedom is free. Like Quebec.
0110100100100000011000010110110100100000011000100
Yes, Canada has this blank media surcharge as well. As well as applying to media such as CDs and DVDs, it also applies to some appliances, like standalone MP3 players (and it's a huge amount for iPods)
A reasonable tariff is zero. By your logic, they should go ahead and put me in prison for owning a gun "capable" of killing someone. Why does your country accept this idea of punishing everyone evenly for possible illegal use of something that is generally used for legal things? How come copiers aren't taxed? And who gets that tariff money?
WTF does this have to do with the article? Oh, nothing, but it criticizes the US, so mod it up to +5.
+5:offtopic,but anti-American
omfg seriosly this is bull shit all these laws canadians "may" face they never happen , this fuck asshole micheal geist or w/e the fuck his name is , is a fucking asshole who tries to think hes smart and shit by making up all this bull shit and then ppl read this bs and think canada is stupid and shit and omfg im gonna stop cause this is tooooo fuckin retarded basically don't beleive any of this bull shit and find something better to do for fucks sake u fagits! p.s Canada Rules 2Dads
This is silly.
Generally speaking, land that is great for farming isnt great for mining. Most farmers also lack the resources, knowledge, experience, and ability to convert their acreage into a mining outfit.
Secondly, most mining operations do not expect to operate for "a few years". The equipment, training, safety, legal, regulatory, and maintenance costs only amortize well over long term periods. This is why you see mining companies buy large chunks of land, and slowly chip away at them carefully, as to not waste.
The timber industry is interesting, and you are generally correct about it. This is why there was such a push for regulation years ago. However, comparing the timber industry to any other industry doesnt really work to well. Lets not compare apples to oranges.
The average fishery also does not operate with the mentality that you speak about. You describe that a return for a one year binge would be greater than a 20 year steady run. The likelyhood that they could capture THAT much value within one year seems unlikely to me. This is why perpetuities generally have more value than comparable annuities. Think about it. $10 forever is worth quite a bit more than $100 once. The market understands this and compensates for it.