Slashdot Mirror


AP to Charge Members to Post Content Online

oboreruhito writes "The Associated Press has announced that, effective Jan. 1 2006, it 'will begin charging newspapers and broadcasters to post its stories, photos and other content online.' The article says online portals that are already subscribed to an online service won't be affected; the change is that newspapers and broadcasters, which have had the privilege of posting online at no extra charge over their usual licensing fees for print or TV, now have to pay extra. How will this affect sites like Google News and Fark?"

11 of 171 comments (clear)

  1. Fark! by Scrameustache · · Score: 5, Funny

    How will this affect sites like Google News and Fark?"

    More boobies links!
    Thanks, AP! : )

    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

    1. Re:Fark! by Grayden · · Score: 3, Funny

      It's a Trap!

    2. Re:Fark! by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 5, Funny

      Who cares, I submitted this with a much funnier headline!

  2. Re:Fark? by timtwobuck · · Score: 3, Funny

    Wellll, because what if all these stories are no longer posted because there was a fee required?

    Fark, Google and the like wouldn't have much news to link to if the news was never posted...

    I personally don't really enjoy about:blank

  3. Your AP member wants... by Tackhead · · Score: 2, Funny
    > How will this affect sites like Google News and Fark?"

    Your dog will want 1 of 1,390,000 steaks?

  4. I read The Onion by smittyoneeach · · Score: 5, Funny

    How does this affect me?

    --
    Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
  5. Re:Fark? by Golias · · Score: 2, Funny

    Meh. All the most amusing stories on FARK come from the Mainichi Times anyway.

    Those wacky Japanese... bless their hearts for lightening my Mondays.

    --

    Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

  6. Charged for news? by rob_squared · · Score: 1, Funny

    Does that mean they'll only charge slashdot once for dupes?

    --
    I don't get it.
  7. Re:Google and Fark? by B3ryllium · · Score: 4, Funny
  8. Re:Fark? by Patik · · Score: 2, Funny
    OMG F1R57 P057!
    Since we're talking about Fark, that should be OMG B00B13S!
  9. A new and better Fark! by trezor · · Score: 2, Funny

    Because that would mean more b00bies and photoshoping! Yay!

    --
    Not Buzzword 2.0 compliant. Please speak english.