Slashdot Mirror


To Pay With Your Credit Card, Please Speak Up

prostoalex writes "It's reasonable easy for a thief to steal the social security number and bank account information (which is printed on a check) as well as an address. The next generation of financial tools are fighting this problem. Business Week talks about voice verification in future debit and credit cards. "Here's how it works: A special sensor on the credit card stores its owner's previously recorded voiceprint in digital form. When the owner receives a new card, he or she speaks a password into the sensor on the card. If the voiceprint matches, the card is activated.""

3 of 300 comments (clear)

  1. Why does a SSN need to be attached? by rattler14 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    No really, I'm am really curious. I admit, I wear a tin-foiled hat with pride, but I've recieved some pretty BS responses from banks when asked this question.

    The worst response? "You need it on your account for your protection". Oh really? Until, I don't know, 1 of the 100 forms my SSN is one gets scanned and posted somewhere on the internet.

    And for those that think it can't happen, some dipshit made a family tree of all of my family across the country and posted it on the internet... 1 out of 10 (out of ~600 people... this tree goes back pretty far) has a SSN posted and it's now in google's cache.

    So I ask again... why is a SSN required for a bank account? What about those people withouth SSNs?

    --
    my last sig was too controversial... now, a new and improved useless sig!
  2. I would be real impressed... by Lead+Butthead · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Considering that voice recognization is still rather unreliable (particularly when people get excited and such) I would think it's a bad idea until reliablity improves.

    It would be rather sad trying to pay for caugh drops with ATM/CC but unable to do so because the sore throat is causing your voice print to shift.

    --
    ELOI, ELOI, LAMA SABACHTHANI!?
  3. I can't stand the rain... by DumbSwede · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I use to work at Wolfram Research and when they moved into their new building the building was protected after hours by a voice activated entry device. This was about 14 years ago. Anyway the device worked reasonably well except when it was raining. There was no awning or other overhang, so in driving rain when you would really like to get in - well you just couldn't. The idea was to be a cost saver by not having to issue individual cards. Oh yeah they ripped the thing out after about a two months. One of the employees (I don't remember who) took it as a challenge to slowly modify his voice entry phrase to something else slowly day by day, by slowing morphing one phoneme at a time into something else. I wish I had a list of phrases he changed from and to, but I don't.

    This was good technology applied in a bad way. As one of more than one way of activating a card this would be a good thing. Thieves are a skittish lot, even if they could sign for card use or use a stolen PIN, the fact they would be expected to voice activate the card first would deter them, not wishing to draw undue attention to themselves.

    Even 14 years ago this technology had a extremely low false positive rate misidentifying someone as someone else. Even 25 years ago I seem to remember this technology being not being prone to misidentification, though more finicky and with a much smaller vocabulary (like 10 words).