E-mail As the New Database
jira writes "BBC has an article confirming the trend of using inbox as a sort of personal database. At my workplace I can personally attest to the growing sizes of those pst files and an unwillingness to erase any emails because of 'loss of information'." From the article: "The trend has become more pronounced as the services have dramatically increased their storage capacity in response to upstart Gmail offering a free service with 1,000 megabytes (Mb) of storage." Update: 04/22 23:03 GMT by Z : To reflect that the story is at respected news organization BBC, not a BBS.
Personally, I think it is a good idea, I would really like to see Google Implementing some kind of "GDrive", where I can have all or most of my documents, I know there is an ap for doing it in Gmail but, I maybe a Google's service with web page and file browser interface (as cool as their Gmail interface) would be nice.
.ppt etc) talking about Scotland vacations, I get some ads about vacations.
Of course, I would like it to be free (as all other Google's services), and I would not mind having the ads at the side if for example I have a document (.DOC,
Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
The article was written on February 8th, 2005 or about two months before gmail started their storage increases.
"BBS has an article confirming the trend of using inbox as a sort of personal database. At my workplace I can personally attest to the growing sizes of those pst files and an unwillingness to erase any emails because of 'loss of information'." From the article: "The trend has become more pronounced as the services have dramatically increased their storage capacity in response to upstart Gmail offering a free service with 1,000 megabytes (Mb) of storage."
.PST
BBS = The BBC
pst = Microsoft Outlook
Gmail is no upstart, they're run by Google. Gmail currently offers 2121MB (that's Megabytes, not Mb - which is MegaBITS)
This isn't news. This is what Google had in mind when they started the Gmail service.
Ever have to deal with a bloated and corrupted .pst file?
:-)
No fun.
Users that like to keep everything on the planet should probably think twice about trusting it all to Microsoft Outlook (or any local POP email client, for that matter)
IMAP rocks.
Of course, after having this pointed out to me it I realised -- "too late" -- that this should have been obvious to me, only I had never bothered to give it any thought.
My point is, thanks for reminding us all of this fact in an appropriate forum. Google fanboys may mod you down but, you raise a very important and relevant point that deserves consideration. I hope I'm not the only one who thinks so.
>> no record of any possible wrongdoing on their part
This is the same reason some people answer emails in person. They don't want it sitting in your mailbox either...
http://request-header.info
Yes exactly, and some people type "There going to the store to get groceries." some people type "Their going to the store to get groceries." and some people type "They're going to the store to get groceries."
The only reason why it doesn't seem universal is because people don't always use the right one. That does NOT make it more or less correct.
Not since Marie-Antoinette played milkmaid has looking simple and honest been so fake and complicated.
Example Scenario:
To: PointyHairBoss@corp.com
From: PeeOn@corp.com
Subject:Schedule Risk for Task A on project deadlines
Date: Wednesday, 10:34 AM
Hi PointyHairBoss,
Because of task B which you just assigned to me today is due next Monday there's a conflict with getting Task A done by Tuesday which will impact our project schedule. Can I start work on task B after task A is completed to reduce this risk?
- - - - -
PointyHairBoss goes by PeeOn's cubicle on his way out at 3:45 PM, golf bag in tow:
PointyHairBoss: Great job on what you're working on PeeOn. ...] which is why I'm counting on you to
work hard and accomplish both Task A and Task B by the deadlines
I promised. ... blah blah ... [How much
longer will I have to natter with this clown anyways.]
PeeOn: Thanks PointyHairBoss.
PointyHairBoss: We need to work hard together as a team and I'm glad you brought this issue to my attention [...blah blah empty platitudes
PeeOn: I hear you boss but Task B is an internal make-work task while Task A is on the critical path for our project.
PointyHairBoss: It's important to meet our commitments. I'm sure you'll find a way. [unspoken message: another weekend of unpaid overtime]
PeeOn:: As I mentioned in my email there's not enough time available to do both and Task B has a risk of slowing down progress on task A which will impact our projects overall progress.
PointyHairBoss: I can't spare anyone else for this; I have confidence you can get this done. [Hurry up already; quit your whining; I'm going to be late for my 4:30 PM tee time]
PeeOn: I'm sorry but I'm planning to take this weekend off. It's our anniversary and my wife and I have plans to go out of town. I can only do one of Task A or Task B by their deadline and I think it should be task A.
PointyHairBoss: Yes, well I promised the Grand Poobah that task B would be done by Monday. I'm sure you'll find a way
PeeOn: Well so long as you realize the risk of delays for task A and you're fine by it then I'll stop working on task A and work on task B.
PointyHairBoss: I'm sure you can find a way to get both done. [Starts walking briskly away.]
- - - - -
To: PointyHairBoss@corp.com
From: PeeOn@corp.com
CC: GrandPooBah@corp.com, ProjectManager@corp.com
Subject:Re: Schedule Risk for Task A on project deadlines
Date: Wednesday, 6:13 PM
Hi PointyHairBoss,
Just to confirm my understanding of our discussion this afternoon. I need to work on task B as my top priority to get it done by Monday, even if that delays progress on task A and adds a risk to the project schedule.
[original email quoted]
Transmitting energy without a license.