Slashdot Mirror


Verizon Pulling Plug on Free Wi-Fi in NYC

Cashen writes "'Verizon Communications Inc. is turning off the free wireless Internet access it beams from New York City telephone booths for DSL subscribers who use laptops away from home or the office.' Full article here. Is it just a coincidence Verizon is expanding its EV-DO in New York at the same time? Guess we have to pay to play now ... The real question is, when is EV-DO coming to Michigan?"

13 of 128 comments (clear)

  1. so people will just hack the corperate/Home AP... by johnjones · · Score: 3, Insightful

    people will just use the access points around...

    come on anyone who buys a router now gets wifi on it and they leave it open OR you just discover the keys and break in (yeah it takes a while but thats life)

    realistically wifi is here to stay and its kind of free (to those in the know)

    most of the students I know dont pay they just leach of others bandwidth or plug into uni...

    regards

    John Jones

  2. Let 'em do what they want... by Moofie · · Score: 4, Insightful

    with their own gear.

    As far as I'm concerned, if it's their stuff, it's their call. I DO have an issue with their lobbyists getting legislation passed that forbids other people from doing the same thing.

    Take your trucks and go home, Verizon. Leave my toys alone.

    --
    Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    1. Re:Let 'em do what they want... by Moofie · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Nonsense. It's their network, and they are under no obligation to continue providing it.

      Don't get me wrong: Verizon is The Devil, and I think that jack-hole who was interviewed last week whining about his customers' high expectations doesn't deserve to have any customers.

      But this is their network, that they paid to install, and the public doesn't have any Right to have it continue. If the public wants a free network, it should have one installed. I would certainly oppose Verizon taking action to prevent that.

      I don't know why you think I was talking about anybody stealing anything. I think you might be having the wrong argument.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    2. Re:Let 'em do what they want... by LiquidRaptor · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They never gave the network, they provided the network, they provided the bandwidth, the maintenance, they provided everything. If they decide they no longer want to provide somthing, hey thats their right. The public was getting access to somthing for nothing, in the real world theres no such thing as a free lunch.

  3. the key phrase in the article by danimrich · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The key phrase in the article is "better business model" = "way to make as much money as possible without being forced out of the market by competitors"

    --
    where's all that Karma?
    1. Re:the key phrase in the article by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 2, Insightful
      "better business model" = "way to make as much money as possible without being forced out of the market by competitors"

      Isn't that the very definition of a for-profit company?

  4. Re:so people will just hack the corperate/Home AP. by FriedTurkey · · Score: 4, Insightful

    come on anyone who buys a router now gets wifi on it and they leave it open OR you just discover the keys and break in (yeah it takes a while but thats life)

    Using an open access point is cool. I leave mine open and people are free to use it. Using a network that has keys on it is uncool. That is criminal because you actually are breaking into a system to use it. It is also stupid because most of closed networks are corporate network that have people monitoring them. There is enough open access points that spending the time breaking into a closed one is a waste of time anyway. I think most people breaking into closed networks do it more for the l33t factor despite being script kiddies.

  5. Re:When am I going to get free wireless? by raehl · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I live in Alabama, you insensitive clod!

    If that's true, how do you post to slashdot without an internet connection?

  6. Submitter, please RTFA by Rescate · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Is it just a coincidence Verizon is expanding its EV-DO in New York at the same time?

    Obviously not, if you read the article in your own link.

    "A lot has changed over the past two years in terms of wireless access," said Henson. "Everybody's trying to look for a business model around (Wi-Fi).... But the better business model in our mind is the EV-DO network."

  7. Re:When one door closes, another one opens by KTorak · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Same situation here also. Verizon is rolling out 3 Mbps/768 Kbps DSL for $30/month with a free wireless router. Many people are switching to that as opposed to the other option which is 3 Mbps/512 Kbps Cable for $45/month. This means TONS of unsecured 802.11g routers in my area. Good for when I need a connection when I am away from my desk!

    --
    Kyle
  8. WiFi runs on free spectrum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    "You can set it up with a Wi-Fi router on your end but then as with anything else you are responsible for the security of the network that you set up."

    That and don't forget to pay the bill in a timely manner. The "community" would hate to see all that "free service" cut off.

  9. the key phrase in the article-Money. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    "As soon as a company goes public... all of a sudden, you are controlled by the greed of the stockholders and the board instead of a handful of owners."

    That's why a smart owner remains a majority stockholder.

  10. Re:Never trust a company to provide a service by IgnoramusMaximus · · Score: 2, Insightful
    If the USA collapses, it'll be because of socialist idiots who can't be bothered to learn history or basic economics, yet still think they should make all the decisions for everyone else.

    Right. Because it was all those socialist idiots like FDR who caused the Great Depression, right? Oh wait...

    Your cognitive dissonance is profoundly disturbing. Uncontrolled and unregulated Capitalism is what caused the catastrophy to begin with and now you turn around and blame those who tried to repair the damage for not re-applying more forcefully the same methods which lead to the disaster in the first place...

    I believe one definition of insanity is "performing the same actions over and over and expecting a different result". Should FDR do what his predecessor did (i.e. be pro-capital, supply-side, against labour etc) he would have fullfilled this definiton. Luckilly for us (and to the amusement of some fringe economy "scholars" who practice voodoo and not science like all economists do) FDR did what he did. And the USA did recover and enjoyed a prolonged period of prosperity ... until the supply-side cult had taken over again ... and they are in the process of removing any last remaining vestiges of FDR's legacy ... and yet, somehow, you say hello to $800 billion budget and astronomical trade deficits! And we up here in Canada, with our down-right pinko commie free to all medicare, old-age pentions and prevalent government regulation (not to mention sticky-fingered politicians) are having surpluses and somehow our economy is not doing any worse then yours, despite our having much larger tax burden. Go figure.

    Or actually I will figure it for you: all advanced societies need some basic skeletal infrastructure to function, more advanced they get, more advanced this support structure needs to be. Thus the government gets to provide roads and police and basic necessities such as medical care and support of citizens in need such as that of an old and very young age. This includes basic education, because more educated the work force, more efficient (and profitable) the enterprises drawing from it will be. Then there is basic protections of citizens from predation by immoral individuals, be they muggers on the corner or silk-suited CEOs. Simple really. Its called civilization. Remove these fundamental protections and support and you got barbarism and law of the jungle. USA is already partially there, up to and including waging questionable wars for profit of some of its select priviledged citizens, which as history teaches (as much as we can trust it) is one of the crucial indicators present in past societies who also slid from greatness into barbarism.