Acquittal in Drunken Homicide via GTA
The Wisconsin State Journal has the news of an acquittal in a drunken homicide charge against a Madison-area 30 year old. The defendant admitted to being intoxicated before the crash that killed his passenger. The jury found him innocent after he presented his defense: the passenger caused the crash by forcing him to attempt a manuever they'd done in Grand Theft Auto. "In an emotional testimony on Thursday, DeMeo said that Alexander had put his hand on DeMeo's knee and made him push the accelerator down hard, then grabbed the emergency brake and sent the car into a skid. DeMeo said that Alexander was trying to perform a maneuver that both had done in a video game, Grand Theft Auto: Vice City, that they played regularly."
I once killed an endangered squid-left it in a freezer overnight. I got out of a fine by saying it reminded me too much of a metroid.
The Braying and Neighing of Barnyard Animals Follows.
When the defendent was further questioned about why he would even attempt a stunt from a videogame, he responded, "I was so sure that sv_cheats was enabled."
'Yes, firefox is indeed greater than women. Can women block pops up for you? No. Can Firefox show you naked women? Yes.'
Otherwise, I wonder that as games become more physically realistic, will more accidents result as more people try to pull crazy stunts they've done in video games?
Whenever I get drunk, I get the urge to pick up a hooker, use her services' and the proceed to run her over and take my cash back.
I also occasionally hide in the shadows and blackjack people who walk by. I think I may have a problem.
I really hate to be cruel , but this is what natural selection is all about..
The prosecution said, and I assume no evidence was introduced to show otherwise, that there was no evidence that the EB had been pulled. Most strange, the passenger was found "moments later" with fatal head and heart injuries, with his hands in his pockets. The defence argues that he put them in his pockets to keep warm. Not likely. With a blood alcohol level of .16, if your passenger dies, your guilty of something.
"A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming, is not worth knowing" - Alan Perlis
I think this puts the Chewbacca defense to shame.
Well done, reality!
Slashdot Sig. version 0.1alpha. Use at your own risk.
"Otherwise, I wonder that as games become more physically realistic, will more accidents result as more people try to pull crazy stunts they've done in video games?"
There's a flip-side to think about. In GTA, dumb-ass pedestrians sometimes walk right out in front of you. Hit them, and the cops chase you. After some time with that game, I became more aware of pedestrians at crosswalks. I now watch what they're doing more intently before going around a corner, for example.
No, it's not like I was running around mowing down peds before. I just mean that I drive more cautiously.
"Derp de derp."
Before everybody sneers at contorted lawyers logic, note that "GTA confusion" was not the defense of the guy on trial. His defense was that his passenger interfered with his driving. Supposedly he did so while drunkenly imitating a GTA move, but his reasons for doing what he did was not relevent, since his guilt or innocence was not at issue.
What if he decided to emulate Rampage instead? Going around punching buildings and eating whatever he finds(be it people, hot dogs, or electric signs)
Monstar L
must've forgot to turn on the +7 Trainer.