Slashdot Mirror
PlayStations of the Cross
theodp writes "Is there a place amid the witches, warlocks and diabolical monsters for Christian video games? The NY Times reports companies like Brethren Entertainment ('Entertaining for Eternity'), Digital Praise ('Glorifying God Through Interactive Media'), and N'Lightning believe that there is a market in faith-based video games. If the idea of Christian first-person shooters seems unlikely, so too did the idea of Christian pop music, which accounted for 7% of the total pop-music market and sold 43+ million albums last year."
You could run around and try to convert people, and when they won't give up all of their beliefs and conform to something they've never heard of, you can kill them.
This would have been a great improvement upon the actual crusades, where people were simply slaughtered out of hand without the chance to convert. One account of the sacing of Jeruselem in the first crusade states that at one place in the city the blood ran to the depth a mounted knight's stirrups.
Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
Clearly an exaggeration.
Very likely, but still indicitive, as was boasting of slaying infants at their mothers' breasts.
Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
it's a proven fact that anything with vampires in it will be an instant hit.
Your game would have to have some witch burnings, and some bonus stages where no one fights back, and wiping them out is pretty easy. Pogrums for example: those jews in their synagogues are probably just doing witchcraft in there. Go in and kill them and the rabbi, and burn the place down, later there is a level called holocaust where you really wipe them out, and later still; you suddenly support Isreal with your whole heart, and prop up this jewish state because it is part of your recipe for armageddon.
How ya like dat?
Another good one would be Hundred Years War. In it, Catholics fight Protestants, and Protestants fight other Protestants for whose is the official church of the state all across Europe for a century. The Rolling Sones included a line about this in Sympathy For The Devil. It is my favorite part of the whole song:
"I watched in glee while your kings and queens fought for ten decades for the gods they made."
The Uncoveror: It's the real news.
Hardly fiction.
From the Encylclopedia Britannica.
The Crusades:
Organized by Western Christians in response to centuries of Muslim wars of expansion.
The Crusades were usually military campaigns intended to halt or slow the advance of Muslim power.
2003 edition Encylcopedia Britannica, Volume 16, p. 822.
The first crusade was a response to the desecration of the Church of the Holy Sepulchre (I mistakenly identified it as Hagia Sophia.).
It was also a response to calls for help from the Byzantium empire in response to Muslim agression and expansion in the region.
The first crusade was in 1095. The Schism between Eastern and Western Christianity occurred in 1054, and relations between the two were improving.
Many people took advantage of the call for a crusade to liberate the Christian holy sites from Muslim aggression and oppression to engage in pogroms of their own. The People's Crusade being one of the most notorious. The People's crusade was condemned by bishops and the church, and many Jews were given asylum in churches and by the bishops from the army of the People's Crusade.
As the crusades continued, they became more corrupt, thus leading to the desecration of the Hagia Sophia (some 200 years after the first crusade).
The Crusades have become the favorite whip used to lash at Christians, just like the colonization of North America has been used to assault white Europeans.
The Crusades were not the pure example of universal evil that automatically results from Christianity that Christian-haters would have you believe, just as Muslims were not the pious and saintly people living peacably at one with all mankind until assaulted by the evil Christians that these same people would have you believe.
The truth is, Islam was a militarist, expansionist religion, and the crusades were a military response to that. And just like some political and religious leaders today hijack the extreme elements of Islam in order to kill as many Jews and infidels as possible, some political and religious leaders in the 11th-14th centuries hijacked the extreme elements of Christianity in order to kill as many Jews and infidels as possible.
You can tell a great deal about the character of a man by observing those who hate him.
For starters, the church did not divide when Rome fell, in fact, there was a long period of time after the fall of the Western Empire that the church stayed united (there were 4 patriarchs- Constantinople, Rome, Antioch, and Alexandria)
The Great Schism came much later than the fall of Rome.
Besides that, most of the Crusaders weren't practicing Christians, they were just mercenaries out to get themselves a free pass into heaven (Read Anna Comnena's "Alexiad").
Furthermore, Rome did not want the crusaders to sack Constantinople, they did that to pay their debt to Venice, because Venice provided the crusaders transport into Palestine (only they never did, in the 4th crusade, because they stopped in Asia Minor).
The crusades and (christian) faith are entirely different things, although the latter was horrently abused by the former.
Where did I say anything against faith? Ist just stated the fact that the crusades were "just" a gigantic rape, pillage and plunder tour, which was put under the sign of the cross for justification and other purposes.