Slashdot Mirror


Google Web Accelerator

Lukey Boy writes "Google has released a free web accelerator product for both Firefox and Internet Explorer. According to their information page the software uses Google servers as a proxy for web content, delivering the pages to your system more rapidly and compressing them beforehand."

9 of 798 comments (clear)

  1. More info by ranson · · Score: 5, Informative

    More information about GWA is posted here: http://blog.searchenginewatch.com/blog/050504-1453 07 Also, browsers other than Firefox and Mozilla can take advantage of GWA if you set them to proxy requests over Localhost:9100 while GWA is running in the system tray. It should also be pointed out that this is apparently geared towards broadband users.

  2. Is this like... by cs02rm0 · · Score: 5, Informative

    ...a proxy which just compressed stuff on the server and then decompresses it on the client?

    Oh... yes.

    Google Web Accelerator uses various strategies to make your web pages load faster, including:

    * Sending your page requests through Google machines dedicated to handling Google Web Accelerator traffic.
    * Storing copies of frequently looked at pages to make them quickly accessible.
    * Downloading only the updates if a web page has changed slightly since you last viewed it.
    * Prefetching certain pages onto your computer in advance.
    * Managing your Internet connection to reduce delays.
    * Compressing data before sending it to your computer.

  3. No thanks! by sanermind · · Score: 5, Informative

    Google reserves the right to modify these Terms and Conditions from time to time in its sole discretion, without notice or liability to you. You agree to be bound by these Terms and Conditions, as modified.
    --

    ---
    the pen is mightier than the sword, the sword is mightier than the court, the court is mightier than the pen.
  4. Re:do no evil! by Dun+Malg · · Score: 5, Informative
    Dow Chemical's motto is "Living. Improved Daily". Unless you're one of 15,000-30,000 people in Bhopal, India, of course.

    Nice troll. Inflamatory, and correct only by a tenuous strand of tortured logic. It was Union Carbide who gassed Bhopal, which didn't merge with Dow until 1999, a full fifteen years after the incident, and five years after Union Carbide sold its 51% interest in the Bhopal facility.

    --
    If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
  5. Re:I keed! I keed! by alatesystems · · Score: 4, Informative

    You mean Googledot?

  6. Re:I keed! I keed! by plutonium83 · · Score: 4, Informative

    ".. and there's no catch!"

    Unfortunately, the catch is google now knows your surfing habits, and their's no privacy policy.

  7. Why you "can't really see" by seanadams.com · · Score: 4, Informative

    I can't really see what google (or anyone for that matter) can really do to accelerate web content on broadband connections. [...] There is no good reason to sign up for this.

    The reason you're skeptical is because you don't know as much about the Internet as google does.

    When you download a web page on your 6Mbps cable modem, do you think it instanly goes to 6Mbps throughput, transfers the page, and then drops to zero? It doesn't. The efficiency *decreases* as your connection gets faster (which is why google does not claim to speed up slow connections - there's little room for improvement). Here's why:

    The TCP stack under your browser starts by establishing a connection (3 way handshake). Then it sends a packet with the HTTP request. Finally after those long round trip times of basically doing nothing, your browser starts receiving HTML. As the HTML comes in, the process repeats for the embedded stuff (images). If you have a fast link (and especially if the server is far away), your link spends a lot of time doing nothing while connections are established and transactions take place.

    By routing your connection through google, many efficiencies can be gained. These are listed in, of all places TFA. It's not just caching, either. Prefetching, for example, is a trick where their servers will start requesting and transferring the images within a web page, even before your browser has requested them. Since the HTML already went through google's proxy, they know what your browser is going to request before your browser does.

    So instead of just pooh-poohing it because you don't understand the technology, why don't you go download a copy of Ethereal, which will let you see these tricks in action. Then you can offer us a more educated opinion based on empirical fact, instead of a long diatribe amounting to "I don't understand how it works, therefore it sucks".

    1. Re:Why you "can't really see" by jp10558 · · Score: 4, Informative

      All that is great, except for 2 things.

      One, you can do prefetching without selling your soul to google. Allegrosurf is good at this.

      Two, pipelining. All modern browsers use pipelining, which severely limits the amount of handshaking that needs to be done to a server.

      Final comment, from what I've seen, the people who are using this program (at least with Opera) seem to see no improvement in the first hour or so of use. In fact, some are reporting slowdowns.

      I maintain my reservations about this being able to offer a significant boost to browsing, especially when contrasted to the major privacy intrusion.

      --
      Opera, Proxomitron-Grypen,GPG 0x0A1C6EE3
  8. Re:I keed! I keed! by bmrh · · Score: 5, Informative

    No privacy policy?

    I clicked on the "Pricay Policy" link and saw this:
    http://www.google.com/privacy.html

    --
    -- Brendan Hills