Slashdot Mirror


Australia Trials Phone To IP Service

daria42 writes "Australia is doing trial runs with a technology which could connect conventional phone numbers with Web pages, Internet fax services and other online resources. Subscribers to an ENUM service register their other contact details, then set up rules that control how and when calls to their phone are routed. For example, calls from anybody but close family could be routed straight to voicemail between 6pm and 11pm. Because it connects to any IP service, incoming callers could also use phone numbers to access Web sites, the Skype VoIP application, faxes and other applications."

76 comments

  1. I don't get it by 2.7182 · · Score: 1

    Thailand did this 6 months ago!

    1. Re:I don't get it by rollonet · · Score: 1

      I havent seen VoIP anywhere in Australia yet...

    2. Re:I don't get it by gfim · · Score: 1

      Then you haven't been looking... e.g.
      Australian Technology Partnerships
      OZtell
      are the two that I use. There are lots of others including Telstra and Optus, although they are mostly targetted towards big companies.

      Graham

      --
      Graham
  2. Sounds like a great idea! by bigtallmofo · · Score: 1

    For example, calls from anybody but close family could be routed straight to voicemail between 6pm and 11pm.

    That way, when a family member has been arrested for sharing too many files on the Internet and they make their one phone call from jail to you, they'll get your voice mail.

    But seriously... I know most people do it but I've never gotten screening one's phone calls. My experience with the federal and state "do not call lists" has been very positive so I literally get no sales calls any more. The only thing I have to watch out for now is the occasional annoying friend that calls, but even that's not bad enough for me to screen.

    --
    I'm a big tall mofo.
    1. Re:Sounds like a great idea! by TEMM · · Score: 1

      Most people dont screen their calls to block out telemarketers and such, but rather to avoid using the phone at certain times. For example, if i am in a meeting i wont answer the phone from anyone besides my girlfriend, spouse, etc. Or if im at work i might want to take close family and friends calls, and co workers, but no one else. Its not because I dont want to talk to someone, its because I dont want to talk to them right now, and some people dont seem to understand the fact that we arent available to talk about certain subjects at certain times of the day. The last thing I want is one of the "buds" calling up wanting to talk about getting hammered this weekend.

    2. Re:Sounds like a great idea! by 2names · · Score: 1
      "The last thing I want is one of the "buds" calling up wanting to talk about getting hammered this weekend."

      Wow, man, you aren't much of a bud then, huh?

      I hope for your sake that your "buds" don't know your /. id...

      --
      "I'm just here to regulate funkiness."
    3. Re:Sounds like a great idea! by TEMM · · Score: 1

      Consider the fact that when you are at work actually working the last thing you need is your friends calling you up and distracting you. They can very easily do so after work.

    4. Re:Sounds like a great idea! by swiggidy · · Score: 1

      Plus, if you're out with your girlfriend you can leave a special message for your wife, and visa vera.

  3. Another phone-number harvesting scheme? by Taladar · · Score: 1

    Will this mean my phone number is as available to spammers as my email adress is?

    1. Re:Another phone-number harvesting scheme? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The phone number is the key. It's the domain name which is used to look up all the other contact details. Yes, it publically associates your email address, your VoIP address, your IM number, your cellphone number and other addresses with your telephone number. Most people will probably just use ENUM to associate their VoIP address with their landline number so that other VoIP users can call them for free without first asking for the VoIP number. Just dial the landline number, the VoIP phone looks if there is a VoIP address on record for that number and make a VoIP call if possible and a POTS call otherwise. That is THE application of ENUM. Everything else is just candy for the unified messaging crowd.

  4. On The Bright Side... by wcitech · · Score: 1

    I wouldn't have to look at excessive flash animated banners anymore...

  5. Adventures in improper English, part 86 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    "Trial" is not a verb, you illiterate simp.

    1. Re:Adventures in improper English, part 86 by generic-man · · Score: 2, Funny

      Do you have some bandwidth this afternoon? I'd like to action a go-round to trial a proposal with you. The key is to be proactive in such a paradigm.

      --
      For more information, click here.
    2. Re:Adventures in improper English, part 86 by Golias · · Score: 1

      Geek jargon 101:

      All nouns can be verbed.

      No need to thank me, I was happy to clue you in.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    3. Re:Adventures in improper English, part 86 by sbaker · · Score: 2, Funny

      Nonsense! You can verb any word in the English language.

      --
      www.sjbaker.org
    4. Re:Adventures in improper English, part 86 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you just language the verb verb?

    5. Re:Adventures in improper English, part 86 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Simp" is not a noun. Certainly not one present in proper language.

    6. Re:Adventures in improper English, part 86 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Verbing weirds language.

    7. Re:Adventures in improper English, part 86 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, according to my dictionary:
      trial (noun definition here)...
      verb (trialled, trialling; US trialed, trialing) 1 [with obj.] test (something, especially a new product) to assess its suitability or performance.

    8. Re:Adventures in improper English, part 86 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Geek jargon 101: All nouns can be verbed.
      "Trial" already has a verb form. It's called "Try". Geez. Doesn't anyone know basic English on Slashdot?
    9. Re:Adventures in improper English, part 86 by mabinogi · · Score: 1

      You mean trial already has (at least)a verb form recorded.

      I challenge you to point me to the list of all the words that are allowed to exist in English.

      I think you'll find that instead all you find are dictionaries, which contain a list of words that have been observed to be used. There is _no_ definitive list of all valid English words.

      English is very capable of having new words created by applying the fairly intuitive rules that all english speakers pick up very quickly.
      The ability to verb a noun is one of them.
      or - The ability to turn a noun into a verb.

      English is also not well known for having one and only one word for every concept. A few more won't hurt things, especially when they are built on words that people already know and understand. It's not like the headline was "Australia sdfsdfs phone to IP service".

      --
      Advanced users are users too!
  6. Should be easy... by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    ...seeing as there's only, like, three phones on the whole island. Oops, I mean continent. :-)

    Hey! I tease Australia! I love ya guys! Hope to come back to Sydney soon! Hugs!

    1. Re:Should be easy... by Avyakata · · Score: 2, Funny

      wtf mate?

      Actually...I highly doubt many people around here have actually ever seen that endless amusing flash cartoon...

      There goes my karma...

    2. Re:Should be easy... by jacksonj04 · · Score: 1

      FIRE ZE MISSILES!

      Dammit, now I'm gonna have to find it again!

      --
      How many people can read hex if only you and dead people can read hex?
  7. VoIP will be dead in 6 months! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Sure, go ahead and laugh at me. You think that VoIP is going to take over the world and put the phone company out of business, and I am some clueless nutcase. Right?

    The fact is that the popularity and ubiquity of VoIP is going to increase because of all the hype. But hype won't be able to overcome the fact that quality isn't as good as the PSTN. Hype won't be able to hide that 911 loaction can't work without seriously impairing theusefullness of VoIP. And, most important of all, hype won't be able to hide the security problems with VoIP.

    How long are you going to continue using VoIP when some script kiddie that you pissed off on IRC DDoSes your phone? Who's going to keep on using VoIP when the latest Outlook worm prevents them form making phone calls for the next two days? Who's going to keep VoIP when they realize that I, or anyone else can listen in on their calls right this minute?

    VoIP is great. I use it right now. But, I haven't cut the PSTN cord and I won't cut the PSTN cord for VoIP. It's just too dangerous and it'll only be another 6 months before disaster strikes and everyone realizes how dangerous it is.

    Think about it; 'Hello? Police? this is ...'. Script Kiddie says; 'Har har, I r0xorz!!!'

    6 Months

    1. Re:VoIP will be dead in 6 months! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i already have no pots connection.
      it works brilliantly.i have 9 diffrent lines 2 different providers,. 3 numbers

      [2 business numbers and one residential number.]
      good services.
      as wellas back up service form my own asterisk box.

      and i would rather use cellular for emergency calls
      .

      thanks

      howver i would echo that ppl shoudl not cancel their POTS but should at least maintain parallel services for convenience /costs saving until they feel they can migrate.

      i would rather have both but can only afford to pay for internet or POTS phone and my voip account doenst cost me anything -- a proper vonage one owuld pay for itself btw =- for the amount i save on cellular and POTS costs.

      this has been difficult to set up and a good learnig experience.what impresses me is the extensive framework and shere depth of effort ppl have gone to in order to make it all happen.

      we are at the beginning of a wave here.
      its not perfect yet.. but it will evolve.
      i been using voip since for ever
      Bt isnt kind and so on.
      and i am sure ntl sues a simlar to voip methodology to deliver phone services over docsis
      for the past few years. so i would nt dismiss it!

    2. Re:VoIP will be dead in 6 months! by amembleton · · Score: 1

      You sound like you're in the UK because you mention BT and NTL.

      How did you get broadband without paying rent for a phone line? Are you on cable?

  8. That muffled explosion you heard... by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1
    ...was the simultaneous orgasm of every phone spammer in the world.

    Every day I get closer to building a secret bunker somewhere.

  9. Thank you for... by pintpusher · · Score: 2, Funny

    calling Google. Due to unusually heavy call volume your search will not be executed for approximately .31 seconds. We appreciate your call, please stay online for the next available operator.

    "Thank you for calling Google, how can I help you?"

    "ummm... hi... I'd like to search for anime boobs"

    "Alright, lets see here is the first result out of 807,000 in .31 seconds. Anime Pics. drink my piss hentai pokemon free asian videos. Rikku hentai anime demons inuyasha hentai, hardcore nude anime boobs free shit eating pics. ...
    humman-traffic.erospace.pl/hentai/anime-pics. html - 10k - May 4, 2005 - Cached - Similar pages" ... I don't get it. Wouldn't be easier just to browse to a website?

    --
    man, I feel like mold.
    1. Re:Thank you for... by generic-man · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Google used to have a search by telephone service where you called in, said a series of search terms, and watched a results page refresh. Looks like they've taken it down, though.

      --
      For more information, click here.
    2. Re:Thank you for... by pintpusher · · Score: 2, Funny

      I guess I really don't see the point, unless you can't type? or maybe you want to provide a search page for someone else?

      Seems more like wow that's cool factor than anything of use.

      I'm waiting for the day when I can pick up the mouse, and in a scottish brogue say "Computer? Computer!?" and get a response...

      --
      man, I feel like mold.
    3. Re:Thank you for... by generic-man · · Score: 1

      Google Voice was surprisingly good at spelling. I tossed it proper names, foreign names, etc., and it got them right every time. Google didn't actually give any feedback on the phone besides "wait for the screen to refresh."

      I suspect they took it down because it was getting to be too much of a strain on phone lines. Either that or they had a really good speller manning the phones and typing things in.

      --
      For more information, click here.
  10. So could they... by RingDev · · Score: 1

    pick up the phone, hit 0 and say "Operator! Connect me to SlashDot.com! I've got a tin foil hat warning!" -Rick

    --
    "Most people in the U.S. wouldn't know they live in a tyrannical state if it walked up and grabbed their junk." - MyFirs
  11. From an answering machine connected to the web: by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 1

    "BOOOOOP. You have 19,347,802,206,103 new messages. You have 3 old messages. Press 7 to delete."

  12. ENUM: Mapping from phone number to other addresses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's it. Enum is a mapping from your phone number to your other addresses. What people do with that information is up to them. You could have your phone line temporarily redirected to some other service (VoIP, voicemail, whatever), but the only thing you would want ENUM for in that scenario is to avoid entering your other addresses. So instead of telling your phone company (or your PBX) that you want to reroute calls to your.address@vonage.com you would direct calls to "VoIP" and they would look up VoIP=your.address@vonage.com. Hardly a milestone of modern communication.

    The much more interesting examples are where your contacts choose the optimal way of contacting you. So instead of redirecting calls to voicemail, you would proclaim that you prefer to be contacted by email after hours. You would also list your VoIP address. When I try to call you, I could use that information to automatically connect by the most efficient means. I could send an email at night, call your VoIP address when I'm using VoIP too (free call..), use POTS when I'm calling from a normal landline or call you on the cellphone when I'm on the same network and it's cheaper. For this, I need to associate all your contact details with a simple key: a phone number.

  13. Re:Of course... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    True. Prostitution/slavery is a major international problem. Only a few countries, like my Canada and Saudi Arabia seem to have been able to stop this horrible practice. The US essentially enourages female slavery for some reason. And there is not a single monument in France to the prostitutes of the French underground that were essentially responsible to the intelligence that the Americans needed for D-Day.

  14. Hypothetical SPAMMER Scenario by LegendOfLink · · Score: 4, Funny

    You: *picks up phone* Hello?

    SPAMMER: Hey Buddy, your woman wants a big one.

    You: What?! Who is this? Remove me from your... *beeping* Oh wait a sec, I've got a another call. *click* Hello?

    SPAMMER 2: Hi, this is Charles Taylor from Liberia, I need to use your bank account...

    You: WTF!? STOP..*beep beep* Hold on. *click*

    SPAMMER 3: Hi, thanks for the advice. Could you open this file immediately?

    1. Re:Hypothetical SPAMMER Scenario by myov · · Score: 1

      I get that now on my landline! Spam messages are left on my voicemail and I'm forced to ignore anyone with a "Private Name" call id.

      Now they're even calling my cell phone (which I thought was illegal) with a recorded "You have won!". I really feel like invoicing them for the $0.25 in airtime charges, just to take on the overhead of paying a small invoice.

      --
      I use Macs to up my productivity, so up yours Microsoft!
  15. Crikey! An ENUM e164.arpa FAQ by rewinn · · Score: 2, Informative
    http://www.enum.com.au/faqs.htm answered a lot of questions

    (I'm not gonna pretend that I understood all the answers ...)

  16. Wrong Way by Phat_Tony · · Score: 2, Insightful
    This is neat, but they're going the wrong direction. Memorizing a 10-digit number instead of the word "Google" isn't making things much easier for people

    I want the opposite: I want my phone number to be arbitrary text of my choosing. I want the whole phone system to use good voice recognition, so that any time I want to call anyone, if I can remember their phone-moniker, all I have to do is say it into the phone. A DNS-like system will go reference this to their actual phone number, IP address, or whatever address and protocol they choose to use for voice communications, and connect me.

    --
    Can anyone tell me how to set my sig on Slashdot?
    1. Re:Wrong Way by blackpaw · · Score: 1

      I disagree - for some reason people find phone numbers far easier to remember than email addresses, witness the number of people that try to email using a phone number for the address.

      Its odd but there you are, maybe its because phone numbers are unambiguous, numbers are numbers. Words have many different spellings, especially on the web :)

    2. Re:Wrong Way by wackysootroom · · Score: 2, Informative

      Memorizing a 10-digit number instead of the word "Google" isn't making things much easier for people

      That's not really all that ENUM does. ENUM isn't grown up yet, but think of it as a DNS for phone numbers and then some. You wouldn't want to have to type in the IP address every time you wanted to view a web page, would you? ENUM does the same for telephony as DNS does for the web. The strongest use of ENUM, IMHO will be the ability to "follow" someone no matter what phone they're on based upon the rules they set up with their ENUM service. If ENUM matures enough and is widely accepted, you won't need to know a persons home number, cell number and work number; ENUM takes care of that automatically.

      I want the opposite: I want my phone number to be arbitrary text of my choosing.

      In the future, you might be able to register a telephony domain name much the same way you can register and internet domain name.

    3. Re:Wrong Way by kebes · · Score: 1

      I very much agree. I think having to memorize numbers is silly. I think having little number pads on phones is silly. Most cell-phone users only use the number pad to enter numbers the first time, and then just use their built-in directory. It would be so much easier if those tiny little buttons were gone and I could (reliably) speak the address/number/name of someone.

      I want my phone number to be arbitrary text of my choosing

      I'm not sure how it could be left up to the individual users. Even with a DNS-like system and name registration (to avoid name collisions), this is complexity that the average person doesn't necessarily want. How about this: every person is randomly assinged a random (non-dictionary) "word". Words could be strange sounding, made up of phonemes that are easier for speech recognition to understand. So my phone number might be "mu-bah-tok" and yours might be "jah-tok-cor"... there are enough phonemes that even with short words we could cover a huge number of telephone #s.

      Contrary to what another poster indicated, I don't think that people find it easier to remember arbitrary numbers (at least not in the long term). The average person remembers maybe a dozen 7-digit phone numbers, but can remember thousands of words, and can even remember the names of many many dozen of (for example) strange-sounding names of cities from some foreign country. I think people would end up remembering these "phoneme-numbers" quite reliably for a large number of people. And if you see the "phoneme-number" for a company on the side of a bus, it will be easy to pronounce it into your cellphone (easier than remembering a phone number I would think).

    4. Re:Wrong Way by Phat_Tony · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Email addresses aren't a good representative for all text. I may only have four or five email addresses memorized (although that's due in good measure to the fact that my email program knows them all and associates them with names and nicknames in its own DNS-like system), but I have hundreds of website addresses memorized, compared to only a couple of dozen phone numbers. Look at how many people's names a person knows, or at their vocabularies, compared to how many numbers they have memorized. I stand by the idea that words and names are easier to memorize than long strings of numbers.

      Email addresses are bad, and I think there are a number of reasons for that. Primarily, they are almost always at some arbitrary seeming domain- uchicago.edu, columbus.rr.com, insighttelco.net. etc. These are hopeless to remember. Also, a lot of email addresses are assigned, or chosen poorly. For example, at Chicago, it was first initial, middle initial, first 5 letters of last name. How stupid is that to remember, among each of a bijillion other arbitrary systems?

      But if you choose your own, and don't have any domain (or the domain for all of them is "phone" or something), then you don't have that problem.

      --
      Can anyone tell me how to set my sig on Slashdot?
    5. Re:Wrong Way by otmar · · Score: 1

      You missed the point of ENUM. IMHO there are three types of ENUM applications:

      a) Calls from the PSTN to VoIP: You only can dial numbers and not URIs on more than a billion handsets which are out there.

      b) Calling someone where you don't know whether he's on VoIP or not. You give your PBX (or softphone) a telephone number and it finds out via ENUM which is the best way to call

      c) Retrieving additional info concerning a phone number. e.g. finding a URL for a photo to display on a headset on an incoming call.

  17. Re:Of course... by cuzality · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    The US essentially enourages female slavery for some reason.

    Not sure what you are referring to when you say "the US essentially encourages" it. According to the World Sex Guide entry on the United States:
    "Prostitution is illegal (a misdemeanor) except in certain counties of Nevada. Visiting a prostitute is illegal also."
    In 99.9% of the United States it is illegal, and a huge proportion of the public would be completely against any attempt to change that.
  18. Agreed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    People don't seem to realize that the phone companies have been using VoIP for years! That's right, Verizon was using VoIP in large scale production more than five years ago and so were many other phone companies. But, they were using it over their own private lines, not the Wild Wild West internet.

    VoiP cannot be reliable over a shared medium where there is no control. The phone companies know this already and the consumer and Vonages of the world are about to find out too. At that point, everyone will come running back to the phone companies and they will find that the phone company is either gone or is ready to REALLY stick it to them.

    People expect 5 nines(99.999%) reliability because that is what the phone company has provided for the past 40 or more years. They will be shocked to find out that their internet connection is only about 95% reliable. That's one and a half nines. There is no way that people will put up with a phone that is less reliable than a cell phone, even if it is dirt cheap!

    1. Re:Agreed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is unless the VoIP becomes much more useful than POTS. Possible advantages:

      • Dynamic call routing not costing an arm and a leg.
      • Higher quality (more than 8kHz bandwith)
      • IM integration
      • International roaming with one number, again without costing a fortune

      VoIP will be the end of landline POTS. It will coexist with cellphones for a while (until it is feasible to be always online wirelessly).

  19. Re:Of course... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It may be illegal, but it is everywhere in the US. If it wasn't popular then it would be gone, as in Canada.

  20. Try it this way - Dink! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Australia Trials Phone To IP Service

    Instead of assuming that "trials" was meant to be the verb, try assuming that "phone" is the verb. Now what does it say?

    Regardless, you're a Dink!

  21. Phone to IP Service? by DJCacophony · · Score: 1

    Didn't they use to call that dialup?

    --
    Slow Down, Cowboy! It's been 60 minutes since you last successfully posted a comment.
  22. DUNDi by kalugen · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Also relevant: http://www.dundi.com/
    "DUNDi is a peer-to-peer system for locating Internet gateways to telephony services. Unlike traditional centralized services (such as the remarkably simple and concise ENUM standard), DUNDi is fully-distributed with no centralized authority whatsoever."

  23. Been there... by c_g_hills · · Score: 2, Informative

    It's not normally Australia lagging behind, but the UK have already done this and produced a report. Particularly of note is the assertion that there needs to be a process put in place to identify who actually owns each number. The telcos cannot be relied upon because they are either lazy, or simply do not want to lose a revenue stream.

  24. This is the opposite of a good idea. by sbaker · · Score: 0

    So the plan is to take nice human-readable strings (like 'slashdot.org') and replace them with utterly incomprehensible 10 to 14 digit numbers?

    Mmmm'K.

    How about using a URL to dial phones? Wouldn't that make more sense?

    'phone.sjbaker.org' and 'fax.sjbaker.org' as well as 'www.sjbaker.org' ?

    --
    www.sjbaker.org
    1. Re:This is the opposite of a good idea. by generic-man · · Score: 1

      But you're not the only S.J.Baker on the Internet -- just the first to register his name as a .org domain. Good move. :)

      The plan ages ago was to create some kind of hierarchy: us.az.phoenix.elm-street.542.john-smith, for example, to describe everyone. Then you could just bookmark your favorite people, and it would be the same net effect as putting all those 10-digit numbers in a phone book. Services like AIM and Skype rely on usernames to be unique, and those too become hard to join when you have millions of users each trying to be individualistic.

      --
      For more information, click here.
  25. Re:Of course... by cuzality · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    It may be illegal, but it is everywhere in the US. If it wasn't popular then it would be gone, as in Canada.

    Not according to the Canadian Women's Health Network, which has this to say:
    "World trafficking in women and children for use in the sex trade is a multi-billion dollar market -- and it is on the rise. The United Nations estimates that 4 million people are trafficked throughout the world each year under threat of violence, due to poverty, or through deception. A report by the Solicitor General of Canada (October 1997) concludes that migrant trafficking accounts for 8-16,000 illegal immigrants in Canada every year, many of them female youths and children who are forced to work in Canada's booming sex trade industry. The same report estimates that those profiting from the illegal trafficking of children and women in Canada earn as much as $400 million annually. Authorities have infiltrated trafficking rings that have imported children and youths from every continent in the world to work as sex slaves in Canada. Every major urban centre in Canada has records of children and youths working as prostitutes, as escorts, in strip clubs and in pornography. Thousands of children are believed to be currently engaged in the commercial sex industry nationally."
  26. Won't cut the PSTN cord either.. by BlacBaron · · Score: 1

    ..because then my DSL would stop working.

    --
    Update Watch - Automatic software update notification
  27. I can just see the faces of the techno-phobes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Martha! Martha! Help!

    "The technologists have got the phone system too, now! We're completely surrounded!

    "We just can't escape the Internet!"

  28. VoIP won't die, it will grow and change by Laebshade · · Score: 1

    The important thing to remember when switching from PTSN to VoIP is to not rely on VoIP as your main means of communication to the outside world. Always have a backup (at least a pre-paid cell phone) in case of emergency. The reliability compared to PTSN isn't there, and I have no problem accepting that. I try to explain to everyone to be aware of the risks, that VoIP is not regulated the same way (if at all) as PTSN, and to think of VoIP as a cell phone; you're not always going to be able to use it.

    I can see where 911 calling could be an issue, though. VoIP will grow and change as needed. When security becomes an issue, it will change one way or another.

  29. I may be crazy, but... by robertjw · · Score: 1

    This seems like a complete waste to me. All I want is a phone number that rings my cell phone. That's it. I can see the ability to route certain numbers to voicemail at certain times might be handy, or permanently block certain numbers, but it seems like that could be handled by the phone itself.

    I think this is going to be one more thing that takes more effort to use than the benefits it will provide.

  30. Wow they are way ahead of us.. by BlueCode · · Score: 1
    as IT Minister Senator Helen Coonan kicked off a year-long trial on Thursday in Melbourne.
    They actually have an IT minister. Does canada and the U.S have that. That is Sick!!
    --
    Ass is Ass, quit being so picky!
    1. Re:Wow they are way ahead of us.. by OppView · · Score: 1
      Unfortunately here in AU... calling someone an "IT Minister" does not necessarily imply that they can turn on a computer, have heard of the internet or know what VoIP is... :(

  31. My new number by Aggrav8d · · Score: 1

    My new phone-to-ip number is 'slashdot' in the 'com' area code. Oh, but don't forget to dial 'www' to get an outside line.

  32. And then there was light.... by OlivierB · · Score: 1

    Laugh all you want, but there's no way in hell I am going for SIP again.
    That's right SIP sucks for all the reasons stated above; security, DDOS, Spam etc..

    VoIP however doesn't need to suck. DDoSes are easily taken care of by NAT Firewalls.
    Security? Try breaking 256 bits AES with your leet AMD Fx-51.

    Spam? just lock out those who aren't explicity allowed.

    But I here you say, SIP cannot do all these thigns. And you're right, but VoIPSIp and Skype is also VoIP

    Skype takes care of all these little problems for me. Sure it's closed source and all. But it's popular and I'm sure if they decide to get all stupid removing these features or chanarging for the currently free services somebody else will move right in and do the same new thing.

    Mark my words, the minute somebody comes out with a small embedded linux or other device that just plugs in the ethernet socket and allows you to SKype (no computer needed), you will see Skype's exponential growth curve steepen even more.

    SIP sucks, get over it.
    VoIP rocks.

    --
    Artificial intelligence is no match for natural stupidity
  33. Light fading fast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    DDoSes are easily taken care of by NAT Firewalls.

    Bzzt! Wrong. The only way to truly defend against a DDoS attack is to have the upstream providers drop the traffic BEFORE it gets to your pipe. Your NAT firewall, or any firewall for that matter, is of no help when your pipe is full of ping floods or whatever other data. It doesn't matter if your firewall is blocking the traffic because your pipe is full of the bogus traffic so the real traffic can't get to you. Your call fails! Even if it is Skype.

    As for Skype it is a steaming load of crap, already. It suffers massive quality issues ESPECIALLY when using Skype-Out to call real phones and that's without anything nasty being thrown at it. Throw heavy traffic or a DDoS at it and it's just as useless as any other VoIP solution.

    And what if the DDoS is thrown at the Sykpe or Vonage servers. Skype uses peer-to-peer which should mitigate the risk a bit, but, the authentication and PSTN termination is all handled by centralized servers that CAN be DDoSed and Vonage is at even greater risk!

    VoIP of ANY kind REQUIRES end-to-end QoS guarantees in order for it to be reliable. There is no QoS on public networks! Therefore, VoIP will never be reliable on public networks however, it will continue to be used on private networks because end-to-end QoS is possible on private networks.

    Oh, by the way, private means PRIVATE not "virtual private" so the first person that suggests VPN's or IP V6 should be bludgeoned with a cluebat or an Olive Loaf. If the packet traverses the internet there is NO guarantee it will ever reach the other end. Therefore, there is no guarantee that you will ever be able to make or receive a call.

    Which would you rather, five nines reliability on your dial tone or no guarantee that you will even have dial tone?

  34. Consider this fact... by 2names · · Score: 1
    Nobody ever says on their death bed, "I wish I had worked more."

    Here are a few other things that have never been said on a death bed:

    1) I wish I had drank fewer beers
    2) I wish I had had less sex
    3) I wish I had tried fewer cuisines
    4) I wish I had spent less time with my friends
    5) I wish I had been a better corporate pogue

    You only live once, so answer your buds when they call. I pity the person whose phone stops ringing...

    --
    "I'm just here to regulate funkiness."
  35. I keel you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  36. They're a tad behind... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Skype http://www.skype.com/products/skypein/ is running their Beta of this (SkypeIn).

  37. Why Quality is really not a problem by billstewart · · Score: 1
    First of all, way too much VOIP equipment uses G.711 codecs, which are the raw 64kbps telephony interface that most of the world's wireline telephones use. Once you add all the headers, it tends to bloat to 80kbps or sometimes more.

    But even 8kbps G.729a codecs, which are the most common compression, are really just fine for most people most of the time. They're better than cellphone codecs, and most desktop VOIP equipment doesn't have tinny little microphones with background road noise drowning them out. (BEEEP!!! $&$%&^%@@$!!) (sorry, what was I saying? Oh, right) Some PCs have inadequate mikes built in, and may locate them next to fans or disk drives, so you may want a headset if you're using a softphone rather than a desk phone. You're still not going to use a modem over them, of course, and many VOIP systems detect fax-modem tones and use an appropriate fax codec instead of a voice codec.

    Some people also worry excessively about latency, because some article they read says that 150ms is a hard maximum and everything sounds terrible at worse than that. But the main cause of latency in wide-area networks is distance, and it's about the same whether you're on the internet or the old-fashioned phone network, because they're taking the same sets of cables across the oceans. VOIP adds a bit of latency in the codecs, but it's not that much different.

    Security is a different can of worms, or more precisely a caseload of cans of worms. Eavesdropping is preventable if you use proper technology, which almost none of the commercial providers does - and even though Skype uses some good algorithms, they've got proprietary code so you can't check whether their key management is botched like so many other proprietary crypto products.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  38. Centralization is a big concern by billstewart · · Score: 1
    The ENUM folks have a technology that has no particular need to be centralized, but they keep insisting that there can be only one! and that they're in charge of the One True ENUM tree, and that everybody therefore must follow their sets of policies for number assignment, naming, legal contact information, permission to use numbers, etc. There's some convenience to having it centralized, but it also leads to new versions of the ICANN-vs-Verisign-vs-sane-people fights, and it's better to have policy and practice experimentation before carving the whole system in stone.

    I haven't checked out DUNDi, but good for Asterisk/Digium for including it.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks