Slashdot Mirror
Red Hat/Apache Slower Than Windows Server 2003?
phantomfive writes "In a recent test by a company called Veritest, Windows 2003 web server performs up to 300% higher throughput than Red Hat Linux running with Apache. Veritest used webbench to do there testing. Since the test was commisioned by Microsoft, is this just more FUD from a company with a long history? Or are the results valid this time? The study can be found here."
Faster to get infected.
Faster to get rooted.
Faster to get used as a warez server.
Nothing new here.
So does that make SMS on Windows faster than morse code on Linux?
Using the same logic, my old '64 International Harvester pickup could be shown to be faster than a Formula 1 race car.
I have the ideal road for the test in mind.
Now all I need is for someone to loan me a Formula 1 race car for the test.
Windows 2003 server running on skynet is 300% Faster than Ye-oldie redhat -12 edition from 1723 running on an abacus.
This reliable Expensive test paid for by Microsoft to show how much better windows 2003 server is(the payment came with a clause stating such).
The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
Sheesh -- with such outdated news, I almost felt like I was reading the newspaper or something.