Free Software Mag Interviews Sys-Con Publisher
NW writes "Tony Mobily, editor of the Free Software Magazine recently interviewed Fuat Kircaali, founder and publisher of Sys-Con Media. The interview revolves around the recent controversy surrounding the article written by Maureen O'Gara attacking Pamela Jones of GrokLaw."
In the event of such a conspiracy, I today announce my new cut-rate prices of my credibility.
For $20, I will state in any highly moderated slashdot comment that Groklaw may not be entirely correct and all sides of the issue must be looked at.
For $40, I will embed subliminal messages into comments stating that Groklaw is evil and SCO is good.
For $80, I will crapflood articles with SCO propaganda.
and for $699, I will state that I too have purchased linux liscences for my company so we don't have to worry about the legal liabilities and also, Groklaw sucks.
All Prices USD, effective date 13 Friday 2005.
Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
If I am elected President, I will submit a bill to Congress outlawing Maureen O'Gara!
I'm John Kerry, and I approve this message.
I'm sorry if the article offended you nuts.
Try not. Do or do not, there is no try.
-- Dr. Spock, stardate 2822-3.
Well its rather simple. To an inexperienced sys admin a slashdotting looks identical to a DDoS.
There's just something so cathartic about that.
Oh, wait, Forbes is still printing Daniel Lyons. Never mind.
Help save the critically endangered Blue Iguana
I hate hate.
Hi there! It looks like you are voicing a dissenting opinion. Would you like to:
Get modded down
Get bitchslapped
Get temp-banned
If that "tabloid trash" ends up getting back to their advertisers, they aren't content to run with it. This is like ringing the doorbell and running... they get off by publishing something like this, but when it offends the public sensibilities they retreat as fast as possible.
I'm glad that they canned MOG, but talk about a lack of balls... the damage was already done. They were just tired of being called jackasses, and thought that pulling the article would stop it.
Jackasses.
Well that makes sense, surely everyone else would be too embarrassed to call themselves an "i-technology magazine publisher".
I suppose it could be worse, they could be an "i-technology e-magazine net-publisher".
Boffoonery - downloadable Comedy Benefit for Bletchley Park
He doesn't understand what he did wrong when he published the article, and I'll bet dollars to doughnuts he doesn't yet realize what he did wrong in the interview.
I can't imagine anyone with even a shred of a clue, when giving an interview that is almost certain to be linked to by slashdot, giving blanket permision like he did:
*Wince* What was he thinking?--MarkusQ
P.S. For the record, if I ever get interviewed and slashdot gets hold of it, I want all of you yahoos to stay the heck away from my house. My number is not listed and I will not pose for photos with you.
Are you suggesting, sir, that the world's leading i-technology magazine publisher (with 16 titles) would be unaware of a simple distinction that our lowliest crapflooder could manage? Don't be preposterous.