Slashdot Mirror


"Get the Facts" Campaign Working

brontus3927 writes "According to a Reseller Advocate Magazine write-up, Microsoft seems to be winning its war against Linux. Info-Tech Research Group recently ran a survey that is now being used on Microsoft's Get The Facts campaign. In it were some surprising results. 'After polling 1,400 IT managers and CIOs in SMB corporations, his group found that 48% were not interested in Linux, 15% were not sure about Linux, and only 10% plan to evaluate Linux." Despite this, two-thirds of all webservers run Linux. The disparity in these numbers comes from the fact that most smaller companies' websites are hosted by service providers running Linux servers even if the company itself isn't."

8 of 499 comments (clear)

  1. Err... by cperciva · · Score: 5, Informative

    Despite this, two-thirds of all webservers run Linux.

    No. Two-thirds of all publicly visible web servers found by netcraft run Apache, but this includes many other operating systems.

    1. Re:Err... by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 3, Informative

      And the vast majority of domains are squatters or placeholder pages that are virutal hosted by the 1000s to a box so it's largely a meaningless statistic.

      Many of the largest domain registrars use Windows based servers for placeholders because IIS does a good job serving static content.

      Netcraft occasionally publishes statistics on active websites. The percentages are the same or maybe are even higher for Apache.

  2. Old news by Cromac · · Score: 4, Informative
    What's changed since this same report was discussed last month?

    http://linux.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/04/08/ 224225&tid=163

  3. Slashdot a handy tool for FUD group? by lheal · · Score: 5, Informative

    This same group came out with the story '"Mid-Sized Companies Not Interested in Linux - Microsoft Still Dominates, Study Says" - April 5, 2005'.

    It looks like the same "study".

    Thanks, Slashdot, for giving the lame "study" more legs and contributing to Linux FUD.

    --
    Raise your children as if you were teaching them to raise your grandchildren, because you are.
  4. Yeah, you're making stuff up. by fireboy1919 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Stripping down Linux is pretty easy. There are many distros that are already stripped down, and every distro I've ever tried has a "server" package, which includes only what you need to run a webserver.

    But even if you do the stripping yourself it's not that bad. Whenever you do something mainstream that lots of people do, you can do it the way everyone else does.

    The dependencies for apache are clearly known by pretty much every distribution. There's even a project to build everything you need from scratch if you just want to start with nothing and build up. In short, if you have dependency problems when you're dealing with apache, you're using a pretty messed up distro to start with, since virtually all of them solve that problem first.

    As far as kernel bloat...I don't know where you're getting this. Even a big kernel is tiny compared to any Windows kernel 95 or higher. Recompile the kernel, or download one of the many, many already created tiny kernels. It takes four minutes to configure and half an hour to recompile and install.

    *Note: Poster may be someone looking to Slashdot to do his research for him, and I didn't want to do so. I will, however, say that the links for all the things I mentioned are available at freshmeat.

    --
    Mod me down and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine!
  5. Re:We tried this... by fzammett · · Score: 4, Informative

    You fired someone for making a suggestion that turned out bad and in the end was a decision *YOU* were responsible for?!?

    That guy is *A LOT* better off now than he was working for you, that much is clear. You are a terrible leader in the worst sense, someone who will cover their own ass at the expense of others.

    You are lucky I am not *YOUR* boss... you'd be on the unemployment line right behind that guy... no, actually, only *YOU* would be on the unemployment line... I'd hire him back and get him a better boss too.

    --
    If a pion (n-) collides with a proton in the woods & noone is there to hear it, does lamdba decay into the source pa
  6. Re:Slowing adoption by rsax · · Score: 4, Informative
    I don't see any movement from RedHat and Novell to sell Linux to Small/Medium Businesses.

    Some movement right here.

    • Three SUSE LINUX Enterprise Server 9 licenses
    • Five Novell GroupWise 6.5 licenses
    • Novell Linux Desktop 9
    • Novell eDirectory 8.7.3
    • Novell ZENworks Linux Management Client
    • Support for up to 100 users and 3 servers
    • Five free support incidents

    All that for under $500.

  7. Re:Slowing adoption by bigman2003 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Well 'running servers' doesn't just mean that we make sure the fans are spinning, and the little green lights stay on.

    I spend 90% of my time programming...and about 10% maintaining the 4 servers that I use. That includes keeping users FTP accounts up to date.

    We have thousands of users, and one of the people maintains the filesharing/e-mail servers, while supporting those users in using them.

    We sell products, and use a webserver/database server/firewall for that system. Maintaining the servers is a small part- keeping the site with shopping cart running/secure/up-to-date is more important.

    Actually for only 4 people, we get a ton of work done- and our administrative overhead is very low. That's why we wouldn't be switching anytime soon- I would have to re-write a lot of what I've done. We would have to switch tons of user accounts, get a new e-mail system, etc. etc. We do real stuff...not just some stupid administrative tasks that could be automated...those are the people who will soon see the unemployment line.

    --
    No reason to lie.