Slashdot Mirror


BBC Launches Linux Powered Weather Format

nzkaha writes "BBC launches new weather format using Weatherscape XT. This may be one of the higher profile deployments of Linux based systems. Weatherscape XT supplies weather graphics for all UK BBC channels plus the BBC World Service. The system relies completely on openGL graphics and there are demonstration clips of the system in use at Metra.info . Developed in NZ by MetService as a cross platform system for Linux, OS X and Windows, the BBC solution has been deployed on Linux with MySQL DB. Data is replicated to remote studios and displayed live by the Weatherscape application using Nvidia Graphics and drivers. Future deployment options will depend on customer choice and platform support."

37 of 214 comments (clear)

  1. news credits by maharg · · Score: 4, Interesting

    a linux system also renders the red+black graphical intro to bbc news. there are many linux systems in use at the beeb. why so surprised ?

    --

    $ strings FTP.EXE | grep Copyright
    @(#) Copyright (c) 1983 The Regents of the University of California.
    1. Re:news credits by Leroy_Brown242 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Because thats what slashdot does? Some times it's nice to just hear the DIN of linux acceptance.

    2. Re:news credits by Oen_Seneg · · Score: 2, Interesting

      In the good old days BBC news intros/studios were totally rendered by SGI machines, we had the proper BBC crest at the start of news, a decent news fanfare and not an apocalyptic remix of the Greenwich Time Signal (see the Apocalypse BBC video here from Bill Bailey here) and we had a VR studio and not the pathetic "we have our newsroom in the background with people yelling at each other/their computers/their office chairs to distract your attention from the real news." studio layout.

      The new weather is an another needless attempt by the BBC to look more modern - change for changes sake, and I doubt the BBC would have to lay off people if they didn't waste money on unwanted projects like this.

  2. not all that great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    ... even the BBC have admitted that they have had hundreds of complaints about the look of the new service already. They had to tweak it once already because the north of England, and Scotland, were disproportionately small.

    People preferred the old format because it was clearer, didn't swoop around, and conveyed all the relevant information quickly and effectively. This new system is unnecessarily complicated and confusing.

    1. Re:not all that great... by astromog · · Score: 3, Informative

      The system was originally developed for One News here in NZ (as I recall), we've had it on that news for many years now. I've never liked it because it's mostly pointless pretty graphics that don't present the weather information in as nice nor concise a format as simple 2D maps. It all boils down to stupid 3D animations of little clouds moving across 3D maps of cities and countries as the day progresses.

    2. Re:not all that great... by call · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Agreed on all fronts (ha!), but I'll also raise the somewhat embarrassing point that on the few times I've actually seen the new style forecast, the frame rate of the display has been apalling, appearing incredibly jerky. That can't possibly have been more than 12 frames per second.

      This is _not_ going to be good press for Linux...

      --
      -- call
    3. Re:not all that great... by Ronald+Dumsfeld · · Score: 3, Interesting
      ... even the BBC have admitted that they have had hundreds of complaints...
      No surprise there.

      The new "service" has been introduced on BBC World as well as in the UK. It looks horrible. It might be good if you're a climate scientist and want to watch animations of weather patterns. As far as I'm concerned, it's absolutely bloody useless for delivering information about the weather.

      I really couldn't care less what they're running it on, the end result is that the Beeb is presenting something that emulates CNN Weather.

      Oh, and the Forecast Cafe has some entertaining discussion.
      --
      Where's the Kaboom?
      There's supposed to be an Earth-shattering Kaboom.
    4. Re:not all that great... by BenjyD · · Score: 2, Informative

      Isn't part of the reason Scotland looks so small to viewers because they're used to the traditional Mercator projection, which makes things further north look bigger?

      Now that they've switched to a 3D globe representation, that distortion has been lost.

    5. Re:not all that great... by teh+kurisu · · Score: 4, Informative

      No.

      Here are the old and new weather maps.

      Here is a satellite photo of the UK.

      Take Jersey and Shetland as an example. They're both about the same size on this map, but Shetland is far larger in real life.

    6. Re:not all that great... by Stween · · Score: 2, Interesting

      People preferred the old format because it was clearer

      To be fair, a cloud with raindrops beneath it and the sun edging round from the side which sat over most of central Scotland was never entirely clear either. What it said was: "Anything could happen." This was more representative of weather forecasting of days gone by, but it's constantly improving.

      I've seen the new style, and I've watched with interest as the rain moves across the landscape. Yes, it still says anything could happen ;) But it says it with greater accuracy.

      The only real failing that I can see (now that they've tried to correct the angle they're viewing the country from) is the time advance -- it's too fast, too far. Advance time, OR swoop around the map, but both at the same time is too much. Advance time with the camera stationary, THEN let the camera swoop around and talk about what's happening at 6pm as apposed to the 3pm view we previously had, for example.

      I don't think the new service is all that bad, but they're definitely chucking too much information out (or not enough information, depending on how you look at it) while they're progressing through the virtual day.

    7. Re:not all that great... by draevil · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "People preferred the old format because it [...] didn't swoop around"

      This is a crtical point that I think sheds some light on the whole fiasco. Far be it from /. to burst the ego of the BBC weather presenting team but I feel that an awful lot of people got their weather information without actually listening all that much to the presenter.

      In the old system people would focus on the informative map in the background and pick up on the weather in their area. They'd tune in and out of what the presenter was saying as they talked about the UK weather, maybe picking up on something if they mentioned a place name near them or they said something of general importance. For the most part though, people would study the wind speed, temperature, front position and cloud cover for their area.

      With the new style system, they've basically forced everyone to pay attention to them as they take the map on a stomach churning ride around the UK at a speed that doesn't allow most people to get any appreciation of the weather in their area. If you tune in too late to the report you'll have missed your chance to hear about the weather in your area at all.

      Most disconcertingly, the camera only seems to stay still for a couple of seconds. For those that haven't seen it yet, imagine that the camera was on a piece of elastic. As it reaches its maximum extension near, say, Cornwall it slows...comes to a stop...then accelerates away.

      That's pretty much the way they've set it up so far.

      The astonishingly London-centric decision to set the camera angle such that viewers have to strain to even read the temperature in the north of the UK was just profoundly stupid. I think what was most disturbing was the way that they didn't seem to even understand what people were complaining about. I used to feel sorry for the BBC being shipped up in some numbers to Manchester (and I still think it'll all end in tears/yet more wasted license payers money) but now I'm not so sure that it isn't the right thing to do.

      That's just a small overview of a few of the problems with the approach. Makes you worry about where the Beeb is really heading....

  3. DIY Weather Channel by CommanderNacho · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Why use web based Weather feeds when you can pick the data off the satellite's directly???

    Connect a 137-138MHz FM communications receiver or scanner to your soundcard and get colour images directly from overhead weather satellites. You can either build your own like I did or just buy a receiver.

    For an explanation try:
    http://www.emgola.cz/www_fa/meteosat_englisch_how. html

    and for a great tool: http://www.wxtoimg.com/

    --
    PORN
    PORN
    PORN
    PORN
    1. Re:DIY Weather Channel by ColaMan · · Score: 3, Informative

      The 137MHz transmissions are due to be phased out after the next NOAA satellite launch. So, it'll probably be good until 2010-2015 when the satellite being launched now gets phased out (or it's APT system fails).
      Note that while there are only 2 active NOAA satellites, there's normally two older satellites still transmitting in backup duty.

      After 2010 or so the HRPT (High resolution picture transmission) digital system will be the only system in use, which requires a tracking antenna and a digital reciever at 1700MHz. The HRPT signal is not encrypted though, and does give better resolution (1x1km vs 4x4km) and more image channels (5 instead of 2)

      --

      You are in a twisty maze of processor lines, all alike.
      There is a lot of hype here.
    2. Re:DIY Weather Channel by Cougem · · Score: 2, Informative
  4. Controversial by rokzy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    the beeb's new weather graphics have been controversial. a lot of people don't like the dark muddy colours. plus Scotland was really pissed because the way the map was angled meant you could hardly see it. this has now been changed, but the new map still doesn't show wind direcion or isobars.

    from the few times I've seen it I haven't been impressed. it looks like a nice virtual atlas, but I never seem to come away with any actual info from it.

    never mind, nowadays I get my weather from the OSX Dashboard widget.

  5. Though you gotta wonder why the ominous name by Council · · Score: 4, Funny

    Oh great, Linux weather. I was quite pleased with Microsoft's pleasant Blue Sky of Death.

    --
    xkcd.com - a webcomic of mathematics, love, and language.
  6. Two questions. by djdanlib · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why is 2D insufficient? I much prefer the non-distorted 2D weather map, even if it means I don't get to see as much area. That's usually ok.

    2D seems much more precise. Where are all those raindrops falling? You can't tell from a still image.

    1. Re:Two questions. by t_allardyce · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Because the the lowest common denominator can't understand anything thats not in 3D, I think they should have 2 separate forecasts, one would be the classic decent forecast and the other would be the totally dumbed down forecast with bikini weather girls and the 3D map would be on the virtual floor so they would have to bend over to point, the 3D rain would be replaced by real rain from carefully controlled nozels so that if it was going to rain you would still have the consolation of seeing the weather girl get wet.

      --
      This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
  7. Why would linux users care? by thomble · · Score: 2

    It's always 72 degrees, humid, partly cloudy fluorescent and (perhaps) stinky in said ecosystem.

  8. That's MetService... by Snad · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ... not MetaService.

    You know, met as in meteorological, as in that wet stuff we tend to call weather in New Zealand.

    There were a lot of complaints when they started using it on TV in New Zealand too, but now everybody's pretty much used to it. Really it was just an attempt to make the "boring weather bit" on the nightly news into something a bit more interesting from a visual point of view.

  9. Annoucing: Google Weather (beta) by eUdudx · · Score: 2, Interesting

    When Google Weather (beta) finally goes live, they will present it it four dimensions. For a lot of folks, the internet is actually a vast improvement over cable "local on the 8's" and the 3D stuff will die its own death if it does not actually add info. I agree that the floating clouds are not instructive. Pointless must be a Kiwi euphonism for useless...

    1. Re:Annoucing: Google Weather (beta) by sydb · · Score: 2, Informative

      Pointless must be a Kiwi euphonism for useless...

      No, pointless is standard English for without purpose. No Kiwi about it, and no euphony either, although the idea is amusing.

      Surely you have heard, or asked, "What is the point of...?"

      PS The word is euphemism.

      --
      Yours Sincerely, Michael.
    2. Re:Annoucing: Google Weather (beta) by Monte · · Score: 2, Funny

      When Google Weather (beta) finally goes live, they will present it it four dimensions.

      That should be terribly useful for people planning to picnic in tesseracts.

  10. Re:So the question is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Nonono, not "the government", Pennsylvania Senator Rick Santorum (R) wants private industry to have a monopoly on distribution of weather data. And that's because he took campaign contributions from AccuWeather.

  11. There have been a lot of complaints about this by Master+Of+Ninja · · Score: 4, Informative
    The BBC have got a lot of complaints about this. They recently had to tilt the map some more as the angle was such that northern England and Scotland were too small. The shadows and falling rain are quite difficult to exactly pin point, and apparently can't be distinguished by the colour blind. And the fishermen are complaining that the old wind directions and what not aren't replicated on this. So while it looks good it hasn't replicated the functionality of the old 2D maps, which IMHO are better.

    See here on the BBC News site for more comments.

    (PS - Go Liverpool for the cup)

  12. That's nice, but the new graphics are useless by onebuttonmouse · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The new graphics sure are pretty and I love to see Linux deployed, but it's now not possible to enterpret the map.

    The graphics move constantly, so by the time you've looked in the corner to see that the map is talking about mid-day on tuesday, the map has moved again. Also, the forecasts no longer include important information like isobars or wind speeds.

    --
    MacBook Pro. Worst name since the Bicycle
    1. Re:That's nice, but the new graphics are useless by t_allardyce · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I love the BBC's cost analysis:

      Old map:
      -Already paid for
      -No complaints
      -Lots of information/not dumbed down
      -World famous

      New map
      -£1 million
      -No-one can understand it
      -Scotland feels left out
      -Obviously dumbed down, less information
      -World suddenly turns off BBC
      -Has no style, doesn't fit BBC graphics style
      -Linux rules
      -Not even developed in the UK!

      --
      This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
    2. Re:That's nice, but the new graphics are useless by MentalMooMan · · Score: 2, Informative

      "I'm not sure that the new graphics are running at 50 frames per second... they look more like they're at 25 fps, which is really rather poor."

      25 fps? That's the normal frame rate of PAL TV.
      25 interlaced frames is not 50 deinterlaced frames. Interlaced means that the picture is made up of 2 half-frames, which is easier and cheaper to record, so It's 50 half frames.

      --
      43rd Law of Computing:
      Anything that can go wr
      fortune: Segmentation violation -- Core Dumped
  13. Waiting for .ogg by bogaboga · · Score: 2, Interesting
    This development is good for Linux and the BBC but I am waiting for the BBC to put up broadcast streams in the ogg theora format. How can we put some kind of pressure on them?

    For those in the know; is it true that for a company like the BBC, adding another format like OGG considerably takes resources and time? If this is the case, slashdotters in the UK could volunteer valuable time and intellectual capital.

  14. NZ Version by kumachan · · Score: 5, Informative

    The NZ version is used on TV 1 and TV 3 here.

    People have mentioned a lack of isobars, wind direction, strength, muddy colours etc.

    On our version we get an isobar map first, which shows the bars changing, fronts coming through etc. Then a broad sweep over the country showing weather effects like cloud/rain + temperature/wind info overlayed by town.
    Then a close up on the major centres (6 are shown).
    The weather is very nice showing what the temperature will go down to tonight, in the morning, and afternoon.

    Perhaps the BBC is doing something different and leaving out some of the info we see here. That would be their decision.

    As for the muddy colour of the map. Perhaps the British should wake up and realise that their green-and-pleasant land isn't a vibrant shade of green any more. AFAIK it uses true colour satillite images of the landscape. So that mud colour is what your country looks like.

  15. Re:Just no.. by t_allardyce · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Yes I think they need a big overhaul on it. You shouldn't dumb down TV just because you think the masses would understand it more - fuck the masses, if they can't handle seeing isobars on screen for 10 seconds then they need to be put down. TV should be at a higher level to encourage people to learn.

    --
    This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
  16. Pity it's shit by nagora · · Score: 2, Informative
    A weather map with no wind or isobars? For an island nation? What moron thought of that?

    TWW

    --
    "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
  17. Great Technology - badly implemented by SHiFTY1000 · · Score: 3, Informative

    The 3D animated weather map has been hugely successful in New Zeland, it is very clear and shows what the weather will be like as the day goes on, complete with cloud, rain and wind (and sun!). It is far, far more useful than a static map.

    It is also very reliable, I can only remember a few times when it failed to work properly, mainly due to poor operators rather than a machine crashing.

    The BBC has done a terrible job of it- they have made Britain a dull brown colour, (its is quite a green and pleasant land outside London!) the animation is hard to follow and they don't show clouds- just their shadows.

    They are about to fine tune it tomorrow from the feedback they have received, so we'll see what they come up with. In any case its a vast improvement from the "sunny, with some rain" forecasts of old...

  18. Heh by NanoGator · · Score: 4, Funny

    "BBC Launches Linux Powered Weather Format"

    Linux users rejoice at finally knowing what the weather's like outside!

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  19. Not a project to trumpet involvement with by Ferrolux · · Score: 3, Informative

    The recasting of the weather forecast has been a deeply disheartening experience. For those not familiar with the problems of the new (linux powered! I would keep quiet about that if I were an linux advocate) forecast -

    (1) Even by its own criteria it does not work well. In terms of presenting information it is a disaster. Masterfully clear and concise icons evolved over decades have been ditched for a series of children's animations that manage to be both impenetrable and suggestive of absurd accuracy at the same time.

    (2) Worse though is the BBC's retreat from providing an informative and educational forecast. Over decades skilled forecaster-presenters subtlety explained synoptic charts and the large scale weather story so that the UK weather - and the uncertainty in that forecast - was skillfully conveyed. This meant that you were never in dark - rain not arrived by lunchtime? the front must have slowed, it will be along later.

    Now there is no structure or intelligence to the forecast - it is a goldfish view of the weather. One result of this was that, regardless of education, many could make a basic interpretation of isobars, etc: quite possibly the only scientific chart they would encounter. I am not sure that losing this literacy is a good thing.

    And why have they done all this? It is a puzzle: the bbc web page condenses the rationale to "Today's media industry is like a shark, either you keep moving forward or you are dead in the water.". Perhaps the weather forecast, previously a high point of the BBC's output - has been handed over those who design programme idents and trailers.

  20. Linux weather? by artemis67 · · Score: 2, Funny

    "The Gnoth-eastern cold front is pushing this Kloud front into our area... it's gonna be Kold enough for the penguins folks! Be sure to wear your Red Hats tomorrow."

    "Have a Sun-ny day! I'm Richard Stallman, and now for Mac Sports... take it away, Steve!"

  21. Not Quite the same by sgidude · · Score: 3, Informative

    Same Name maybe, everything else is totally differrent, TVNZ's was running on an IndigoII MaxImpact until last week, when it switched to Linux also.
    The big difference is the code base & design philosophy.
    The TVNZ one is the original & alot older ( '96 written ), based on a web UI, using perl scripts to start up & trigger events ( unix signals ) & hand drawn regions for clouds, able to be tweaked every hour, generally every 6, then interpolated in real time. It also is tightly coupled data & presentation, which was my fault, but it was built in under 3 months from memory by one person ( me ), 4 years 5 odd people for the WeatherscapeXT :) ( XT does a vast amount more UI wise & they had some smart AGP->PCIX video transfer, pity the FX4400SDI came along ).
    The TV3's Weatherscape XT integrated UI gives a heap more control & flexibility. TV3 WeatherscapeXT is also using modelled clouds.
    To even the screwup's equation, they used opengl lines for rain ( it looks that way anyway ), whereas I used antialiased lines on poly's, mine scale width with distance, theirs don't :), I used that alot & would not change it.
    Nigel