Slashdot Mirror


India Will Need to Recruit 120,000 Foreigners

indi_jobs writes "After all the noise about jobs moving from Europe and USA to India, ZDNet India is reporting that 'India faces a massive shortage of workers with European language skills over the next five years which could see the country needing to recruit up to 120,000 foreigners...' Looks like the jobs may be moving to India but they might require the original people to do some of the jobs!" From the article: "Evalueserve said the ramping up of non-English speaking capability by the Indian offshore firms is an attempt to capture a larger share of the continental European outsourcing market, and reduce the country's high-risk exposure of more than 80 per cent of business coming from the UK and the U.S. economies."

21 of 453 comments (clear)

  1. Are Indian workers *that* much cheaper? by drunkennewfiemidget · · Score: 5, Insightful

    To attract new workers in India and people (as many as 120k) to India, wouldn't they need to offer better benefits, less taxes, higher pay, etc? At that point, wouldn't it make more sense to bring the work back to this side of the ocean?

    1. Re:Are Indian workers *that* much cheaper? by mgrassi99 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This is the beginning of the great "equalization." It won't be long until Indian workers (and foreign workers in India) demand a standard of living that drives up their required salaries. Since the globalization scare began a couple years ago (actually, its been happened for decades), I've been saying it can't last for too long, now that we're all part of one global economy and not packetized in little closed-off sections of the world.

    2. Re:Are Indian workers *that* much cheaper? by kaalamaadan · · Score: 4, Insightful
      If Indian I.T. workers with good American English are in short supply

      Which part of "continental" "European" "languages" did your excellency find slippery in comprehending?

  2. one word: by dlefavor · · Score: 3, Funny

    karma

  3. Dear India: by phyruxus · · Score: 4, Funny

    My resume is on my web page.

    --
    "A witty saying proves nothing." ~Voltaire
    "d'Oh!" ~Homer
    1. Re:Dear India: by RealAlaskan · · Score: 4, Funny
      My resume is on my web page.

      And it says:

      Languages:
      C/C++, Perl, Lisp, Java,
      Visual Basic, HTML,
      CGI-scripting, DOS Batch.
      Sorry, none of those are ``European'' languages. You're screwed.
  4. Get out your keyboards. . . by Nomihn0 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Looks like the jobs may be moving to India but they might require the original people to do some of the jobs!

    Ah, the joys of documenting others' code.

  5. Sorry USA... by rsidd · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Looks like the jobs may be moving to India but they might require the original people to do some of the jobs!

    Given that non-English language skills are the problem, Americans are still out of luck...

  6. Hmmm by puppetman · · Score: 4, Funny

    To combat the labour shortage, India should outsource the work to North America and Europe. Lots of surplus labour. And the way wages are climbing in India, the West might be able to do it cheaper.

  7. One way ticket by dfn5 · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I see a problem with this. I knew people who moved to America from Brazil, worked at McDonalds for a few years, and went home rich. If we Americans go to India to work we'll be stuck there because we won't be able to afford to move back.

    --
    -- Thou hast strayed far from the path of the Avatar.
  8. Business plan. by team99parody · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I keep thinking I should hire some random guy in India (doesn't need to know computers - just have a phone # in india) to be the "CEO" of my own personal consulting company and sell consulting services to the local businesses. When large companies buy our services, I then hire a bunch of the unemployed silicon valley .com victims for minimum wage to do the actual work.

    Benefits all around

    • Layed off .com programmers are cheaper than Indian workers.
    • Layed off .com programmers are in the same time-zone so can service the clients better.
    • Indian CEO is cheaper than US CEO.
    • Indian Headquarters makes big companies more likely to sign up.
    1. Re:Business plan. by lcsjk · · Score: 3, Funny

      Now you are beginning to get the hang of this global economy stuff!

    2. Re:Business plan. by faust2097 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      That's funny, because all the people I know who are good at what they do here in the Bay Area are gainfully employed and making more money than we were in 2000 [and it's *cash* too]. Hell, I haven't worked at a company that didn't have 5+ open local programmer reqs since 2001.

      The people who are still out of work 5 years later must be seriously lacking in any valuable skill other than "inflating executive egos", "blowing hot air" and "getting other people to do their work for them". Yeah, if you were a "producer", "integrator" or "chief creative officer" in '99 you're going to be driving a cab but there's always a demand for people who have good ideas and can deliver on them.

      p.s. Please note that "writing some complicated text parsing code that kind of integrated with a database" isn't marketable in the valley anymore.

  9. English-speaking language skills in short supply by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    English-speaking language skills could also be in short supply.

    I find this hard to believe considering the proficiency in English I see evidenced in the average Indian help desk I've frequented. I'd venture to say some of them speak even more weller than some Slashdot editors.

  10. There is no such thing.... by Twillerror · · Score: 4, Funny

    as a reduced price lunch.

  11. MWHAHAHAHA by AKAImBatman · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It looks like the supply end of the curve is dropping as the demand curve goes up. Before you know it, this could result in an increasing cost of outsourced workers. Combined with the exact opposite curve in the countries doing the outsourcing (i.e. low demand == lower cost workers), a balance will soon have to be struck that will again restore tech workers to a thriving market in both America/Europe and India. No, there's not going to be another "tech boom". That's over with.

    I have to say that I found the article rather amusing, as I've ran up against many of the "English speaking" Indian call centers. (I'm looking at you Citibank.)

    Q: What do you get when you mix an Indian accent with the British flavor of English?
    A: Something completely incomprehensible to an American.

    It's amazing how many cues exist in the accents we use in our language. American English is actually quite forgiving of foreign accents, but it frustrates me to no end trying to understand the Indian on the other end. It's not that he has an Indian accent. The reps actually tend to speak English quite well. The problem is that the slight Indian accent completely throws off the British accent (which most Americans are unaccustomed to anyway) and makes it very difficult to comprehend their speach. Add the quality of a telephone connection on the mix and you've got a communications disaster far worse than the bored utterances of the previous Floridians. (Who were no shining examples of pretty speech themselves.)

    Ok, I'm done complaining. I'm sure I'll soon be hearing from all manners of Indians, British, and Floridians who all feel slighted just because I had a bad customer support experience. Cheerio! :-)

  12. It's a question of exchange rates by mangu · · Score: 5, Insightful
    It won't be long until Indian workers (and foreign workers in India) demand a standard of living that drives up their required salaries.


    The technical people in India and other third-world countries already have a standard of living that's equal or above their counterparts in the USA and Europe. Their wages only seem so low because the money exchanges aren't linear.


    India, China, and other countries keep their exchange rates artificially low to increase their exports. This is made necessary mostly because the USA and Europe have heavy subsidies on agricultural products that compete with third-world exports. What's the point in subsidizing orange growth in Florida, if Brazil has perfect soil and climate for growing oranges, while Florida is only marginally adequate for oranges? Why does Europe grow sugar beets if sugar cane produces sugar at much lower costs?


    In order for less industrialized countries to compete with the agricultural products which make most of their economy, they must lower prices by depressing the exchange rates.


    If you are an unemployed engineer in the USA, blame not the CEO who follows a sane economic policy. Blame the farmers and their lobbyists.

    1. Re:It's a question of exchange rates by Jardine · · Score: 3, Funny

      What's the point in subsidizing orange growth in Florida, if Brazil has perfect soil and climate for growing oranges, while Florida is only marginally adequate for oranges? Why does Europe grow sugar beets if sugar cane produces sugar at much lower costs?

      What happens if the few nations that grow sugar cane decide to cut off the supply to certain countries?

      First you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women.

    2. Re:It's a question of exchange rates by ultimabaka · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Good strong economic analysis. I like that. Although I'm not so sure about the broadreaching statement that they simply "live better" than people in the US or Europe.

      On an aside, however, good luck trying to get anything done in terms of the farmers and their lobbyists. For little more than reasons of national pride, farmers are the most heavily protected group of people, no matter where they are, in the entire world. The political fallout of removing any kind of subsidy from the farmers group would be heard throughout the country, and it simply doesn't make any sense.

      Until you insert into peoples' heads the idea that all nations "must" be self-sufficient foodwise, else suffer horrible failure...or something.

    3. Re:It's a question of exchange rates by the-build-chicken · · Score: 3, Insightful

      What's the point in subsidizing orange growth in Florida, if Brazil has perfect soil and climate for growing oranges, while Florida is only marginally adequate for oranges? Why does Europe grow sugar beets if sugar cane produces sugar at much lower costs?

      I heard this argument put to a european diplomat onces and the answer he gave, which I though insightful, was something like (not verbatim):

      It's true that the crops our farmers grow can be grown cheaper elsewhere, however we choose to recognise that farms and farming communities give us more than just their agricultural output. They give us values, a community. They give us a connection with our heritage and control over our food supplies. They are custodians of the land and maintain our country side. They assist in preserving agricultural knowledge and preserving a way of life that is beneficial to all our citizens. We realise there is a premium to be payed for all of this and are willing to pay it though subsidies.

  13. Re:Worker's Paradise by OzPhIsH · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You're killing me.

    You think it is a good thing that in a country with a billion people, there is a labor shortage of hundreds of thousands in the tech field? This country has a BILLION people. BILLION. This isn't evidence of Indian government doing things right, its evidence of them doings going WRONG. What is wrong with these billion people that not even a fraction of a percent of them are skilled enough to fill these jobs?

    The problem inherently lies in education. These billions of Indians don't (yet) have the education to fully compete in the tech field. The labor force is not up to par when it comes to actually knowing how to do the job. Oh, sure the COST of labor is what makes them competitive compared to American workers, but in terms of actually having the necessary skills to compete, its still no contest.

    In reality, the fact that there isn't such a huge gap between supply/demand for tech workers in the US, especially porportional to the number of people living in the country, is a good thing. Wait, hear me out. Sure it isn't necessarily appealing at first for you, the worker as an individual. Wages are lower when your skills aren't in demand, everyone knows this. You have to look past that though. The fact that we actually have the labor supply to meet our still rather high demand for tech workers says everything about the education of people living in the US. Imagine if the US had such a labor shortage in the tech field. It would be disasterous! It would be a prime indicator that Americans were simply too dumb to fill the positions. An educated population is a good thing at home, and it is a good thing abroad. As the world becomes more educated, we all benefit.

    Praising misguided government "labor policies" for a situation that is really the result of horrible education and living conditions, which have been fostered by their ass-backwards goverment for generations, is just something I won't do. If you think that Indian government policy is really so much better than what takes place in America, then feel free to move over there, as already many posts have suggested doing. I for one would rather be homeless on the streets in the US then work in India. Worker's Paradise it ain't.

    --

    "To lead the people, you must walk behind them"