Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Plans Hypervisor for Longhorn

ninjee writes "Microsoft reiterated plans to launch its own Windows-based 'hypervisor' software for running multiple operating systems. Bob Muglia, senior vice president in the Windows Server Division, said on Tuesday that the software will be 'built directly in Windows and will allow companies to virtualize multiple operating systems.' "

19 of 384 comments (clear)

  1. just wondering... by professorhojo · · Score: 5, Funny

    will this "Hypervisor" come in the form of a paperclip?

    "Hi! It looks like you're trying to load an alternate operating system."

  2. Right.... by TheRealMindChild · · Score: 4, Funny

    ... built right into the operating system... just like IE, and Windows Media Player...

    --

    "When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade. Make life take the lemons back!" -- Cave Johnson
    1. Re:Right.... by pocketfullofshells · · Score: 3, Funny

      All your OS are belong to hypervisor! For great justice, move all *nix!

  3. Good Luck by buddhapkt · · Score: 2, Funny

    They can't seem to ever get their own operating system right how are they gonna emulate anyone else?

  4. Re:Unix Support? by MightyMartian · · Score: 3, Funny

    Microsoft cripple a competitor's software? Say it ain't so! I mean, Bill Gates is such a great guy. He gives all that money to needy people. He'd never do anything so ethically questionable. He's an all-around humanitarian.

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  5. But seriously, folks by pocketfullofshells · · Score: 2, Funny

    this sounds like another one for the anti-trust gang.

    Windows, now newer and better tasting! It slices, dices, and now also controls all your other Operating Systems!

    Sources not included, some assimilation required.

  6. Re:Unix Support? by ArsonSmith · · Score: 2, Funny

    SCO is the only one they plan to support at this time.

    --
    Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
  7. yes! by blackmonday · · Score: 4, Funny

    "...allow companies to virtualize multiple operating systems."

    It will also allow you to:

    reintermediate enterprise markets
    synergize synergistic metrics
    strategize vertical e-commerce
    deploy viral bandwidth
    and lastly...
    unleash user-centric portals


    1. Re:yes! by kmortelite · · Score: 2, Funny

      "...allow companies to virtualize multiple operating systems."

      It will also allow you to:

      reintermediate enterprise markets
      synergize synergistic metrics
      strategize vertical e-commerce
      deploy viral bandwidth
      and lastly...
      unleash user-centric portals


      And I thought reading my old perl code was hard!

    2. Re:yes! by Humorously_Inept · · Score: 4, Funny

      Hey, thanks! Now I don't need to go to any meetings for the next month!

      --

      ~Someday, I hope to be an aspiring author.
  8. Re:Unix Support? by lostchicken · · Score: 3, Funny

    Geez, I almost did my usual "No, silly, Mac OS X won't run on x86..." post. It's pretty much reflex at this point.

    (of course, it probably won't run Mac OS X/Intel, which will most likely require some sort of special hardware, be it a custom firmware or chipset, to run, just to ensure that you're using an actual Mac)

    --
    -twb
  9. Pinky, are you thinking what I'm thinking? by Cr0w+T.+Trollbot · · Score: 5, Funny
    Brain: Mac OS X on Intel, Microsoft offering virtual OS environments on Windows...Pinky, are you thinking what I'm thinking?

    Pinky: I think so, Brain, but won't Bill have to divorce Darl McBride first?

    Crow T. Trollbot

  10. Great ! by alexhs · · Score: 5, Funny

    Then you will be able to contaminate multiple operating systems instances with a single instance of IE running on a single instance of Windows !

    --
    I have discovered a truly marvelous proof of killer sig, which this margin is too narrow to contain.
  11. Ob: MCP joke... by Thud457 · · Score: 2, Funny

    "That's vi, he fights for the user against the hypervisor."

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  12. Convenience of Linux + stability of Windows! by Changa_MC · · Score: 2, Funny

    Now I can run Xeyes and still get my beloved BOSD!!

    --
    Changa hates change.
  13. Re:Virtua(wha) by gr8_phk · · Score: 4, Funny
    "I am sick of people adding "ize" to the end of words to make them verbs."

    In short, you hate when people verbize stuff.

  14. Yes by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 5, Funny
    You'll be able to run Longhorn, Windows XP, Windows 2000, Bob, Windows 95, DOS, and Windows Me!

    All at the same time!

    And hypervisor is just the working name. The final product will be called KlustrPhuk.

  15. Re:Hypervizer ain't done 'til Linux won't run... by sconeu · · Score: 2, Funny

    You, sir, are a newbie. The original quote was " DOS isn't done until Lotus won't run"

    --
    General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
  16. Re:Virtua(wha) by Mitchell+Mebane · · Score: 3, Funny

    Verbizing is bad, but it's the renounification I really hate.

    --

    The roots of education are bitter, but the fruit is sweet.
    --Aristotle