Slashdot Mirror


Disposable Camcorder

shamowfski writes "CVS Corp on Monday began selling a disposable digital camcorder. The $29.99 pocket-sized camcorder was developed by Pure Digital Technologies Inc., a San Francisco-based start-up company. The camcorder weighs under 5 ounces and holds 20 minutes of digital video and sound. It features a 1.4 inch color playback screen and an ability to delete video, and it saves video on a memory chip instead of tapes. Can't wait till they hack this one."

53 of 225 comments (clear)

  1. Not new.. by PopeAlien · · Score: 5, Funny

    My camcorder is already disposable.

    Its just really expensive to replace.

    1. Re:Not new.. by DustMagnet · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I haven't had a digital camera die a natural death yet.

      What's a natural death for a man-made artifact?

      --
      'SBEMAIL!' is better than a goat!!
    2. Re:Not new.. by TekPolitik · · Score: 2, Informative
      My camcorder is already disposable. Its just really expensive to replace.

      Damn it, you beat me to it. Seriously, I paid $900 for a major brand camcorder and a year and 3 months later it's kaput - repair price exceeds replacement price. The problem - a manufacturing defect in the processor. The warranty - 1 year. That's the last time I buy expensive crap from Sony.

    3. Re:Not new.. by Skynyrd · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Damn it, you beat me to it. Seriously, I paid $900 for a major brand camcorder and a year and 3 months later it's kaput - repair price exceeds replacement price. The problem - a manufacturing defect in the processor. The warranty - 1 year. That's the last time I buy expensive crap from Sony.

      I know many, many, many people with the same story - expensive Sony toy dies just after the warranty. They have all sworn off of Sony.

      I'm amazed at haw many times I've heard that.

    4. Re:Not new.. by pete6677 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's a shame that this once great company is now running on fumes, clinging to an old reputation of high quality while they now pump out crap. I haven't had, or heard of anyone having, a good Sony experience in the last 7 years, the PS2 being about the only exception.

  2. How to check this out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm trying to checkout the CVS camera, but no luck:

    cvs co disposable_camera
    cvs checkout: No CVSROOT specified! Please use the `-d' option
    cvs [checkout aborted]: or set the CVSROOT environment variable.

    Can anyone help me check out the camera?

  3. Now we will get "video" images from battlefields by geomon · · Score: 2, Interesting

    With something so cheap and disposable, it is just a matter of time before these start to become part of the soldier's standard kit.

    --
    "Rocky Rococo, at your cervix!"
  4. Has the prior digicam hack... by robslimo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    been used much?

    I mean, how many people actually did the hack and got a cheap, reusable digital camera out of the deal?

    I'm betting it wasn't enough to have a large effect on sales.

    1. Re:Has the prior digicam hack... by jamsessionjay · · Score: 2, Funny

      You think people around here need a reason to [hack/run linux/shit] on some new toy?

      You must be new here.

    2. Re:Has the prior digicam hack... by morcheeba · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I've gotten feedback from a couple of photography teachers who use it for teaching kids. I have no idea how much this has impacted sales, but I've seen articles in popsci and pc world, so it has gotten out to the public. Next to teaching, my personal favorite use has been the guys who launched one in a balloon to 52,000 feet (previously mentioned on slashdot)

  5. Whee!! by Grendel+Drago · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yep, we're going to be seeing a whole lotta fresh amateur porn over at Livejournal from this. Man, I love PureDigital.

    --grendel drago

    --
    Laws do not persuade just because they threaten. --Seneca
    1. Re:Whee!! by fishbowl · · Score: 2, Interesting


      >It has to be taken to a place to be "developed"
      >onto a DVD. People aren't going to do that.

      You've never worked in a photo lab. Your assumptions about what people won't do, are wrong.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
  6. Nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I for one welcome our new Upskirt overlords

  7. 20 minutes?!? by The_Rippa · · Score: 4, Funny

    That's enough space to capture the entire life-span of sexual escapades of most of the people posting to this thread.

  8. Allready Hacked.. by luxis · · Score: 3, Informative

    http://cexx.org/dakota/pv2.htm

    Might... get one myself..

  9. more info & the PV2 still camera with LCD by morcheeba · · Score: 5, Informative

    As pointed out yesterday on engadget, these cameras have been out a few months -- it's just that the press release came out recently. Yep, it's from the same company that made the hacked still camera.

    The community working on hacking this new camcorder is located at:http://camerahacks.10.forumer.com/viewforum.php ?f=13

    These cameras seem to have an external program memory, so it might not be too hard to hack. The forum above also has dissection pictures.

    BTW, last summer PureDigital came out with a still camera called the PV2. Unlike the one that was previously mentioned on slashdot, this new one has an LCD post-view screen and it's based on a completely different chipset. It has also been hacked. I figured out the authentication mechanism on this and most of the communications. Others got the camera to work with standard drivers and are figuring out the proprietary raw format. I wrote a disassembler and have published commentary on the built-in firmware, but you'll need a camera & firmware file to make sense of it. The firmware is protected by a checksum, but that was easy to find and correct.

    main pv2 forums
    PV2 FAQ from the forum - a great starting place
    my FAQ's
    unofficial devkit for writing your own programs.

  10. Re:Wait a second... by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 5, Informative
    TFA is misleading. Not disposable, but instead reusable.

    Take your video, return the camera to CVS, and they burn it onto a DVD for you. Erase the card, and sell(rent) it to you (or someone else) again. Just like the 'one use' still cameras.

    This WILL be hacked to allow home retrieval of the video. Wonder what the resolution is?

  11. Re:Wait a second... by ReverendLoki · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I believe they mean it has a memory unit, capable of storing about 20 minutes of video, hardwired into the internal workings of the machine, not readily accessible from the exterior. This would be similar to other disposable still cameras, anyways. You can delete some video and re-shoot it, but can't hold more than 20 minutes at a time. In the lab, they have their own means of accessing the data, which they then burn to a DVD for you.

    I can't help but think that, since I imagine they will re-use everything, including the memory unit, that people will find out not only how to get the data form the chip itself, but also will be able to read what was recorded on there by previous disposable camcorder owners. No chance of that going wrong at all...

    --
    09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
  12. Great idea for motorcyclists. by demonic-halo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I think it's a great idea for motorcylists. I like to go crusing alot. I can give one of these to my biker babe sitting in the back so she can film the rest of the posse without worrying about losing an expensive camcorder.

    1. Re:Great idea for motorcyclists. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Are you sure its the "posse" you want the biker babe to be filming?

  13. Expensive by stoolpigeon · · Score: 3, Insightful

    So if you play by the rules - you spend 30 bucks to rent it, then another 13 to get the burned dvd. $43 for a 20 minute DVD. Seems a bit steep in my book.

    --
    It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
  14. Re:Wait a second... by crymeph0 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Article's not too clear. My guess is that you can't get to the card directly, and they use some sort of super-secret connector to actually get the data from the camera to their computer at CVS, then they burn the video to a DVD for you.

    --
    It should be illegal to say that freedom of speech should be limited.
  15. Re:Now we will get "video" images from battlefield by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 3, Interesting
    With something so cheap and disposable, it is just a matter of time before these start to become part of the soldier's standard kit.
    Wasn't that sort of thing (soldiers with cameras and camera-phones) cracked down on after the Abu Gharib thing?
    --
    Drill baby drill - on Mars
  16. Just another stock scam? by infolib · · Score: 2, Informative
    --
    Any sufficiently advanced libertarian utopia is indistinguishable from government.
  17. waiting for the hook. by JVert · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is not feasable. I'd pay $20 for a 1.4" color screen to play with on its own. There has to be a deposit to make sure they are recycled by the right people. So the $20 includes the ability to get the data back out? Pay $80, get $60 back when you turn the case in, that I can see happening.

  18. This will be dead soon... by sterno · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Realisistically, how long before the average cell phone has basic video recording capabilities? Most phones now have still cameras, and the main limitation on video is just storage capacity. So, I should think that within 5 years, video cell phones will be standard and then this device is totally irrelevant.

    --
    This sig has been temporarily disconnected or is no longer in service
    1. Re:This will be dead soon... by argent · · Score: 2, Insightful

      how long before the average cell phone has basic video recording capabilities?

      I doubt I'll ever get a cellphone that has a camera, let alone video, built in. Cellphones already have too many battery-hungry features as it is.

      Give me bluetooth devices I can use WITH my phone instead.

    2. Re:This will be dead soon... by argent · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Because, of course, the camera uses battery power when not in use.

      It uses at least 2cm of space that could otherwise have been used for the battery. So either the phone is bigger (bad) or the battery is smaller (bad).

      Features are not free, and features always seem to end up sucking battery life one way or the other.

    3. Re:This will be dead soon... by grumbel · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The real question is when will the bandwidth of a mobilephone be large and cheap enough so that I can just stream the video for recording to my server at home in realtime? Who needs local storage if there is floating enough free storage around on the net? All it needs is a fast enough way to access the net. If mobile phones fail to provide that, maybe free WiFi access points will cover it at least for the more public places. Who knows, will certainly be interesting when you see the first 'my whole life 24/7 on video'-movies coming up.

  19. Just buy a camcorder by DamienMcKenna · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You can get decent camcorders (Panasonic PV-53) off ebay for $100, why bother with this POS?

  20. Re:Now we will get "video" images from battlefield by JVert · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Soo... We trust them with guns but not cameras?

  21. Re:Memory erasing? by DigiShaman · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Fuck that. I would never have any "special moments" recorded. Not now, not ever..with anything.

    I don't like the idea of that shit comming back to haunt me on the internet. Because you know shit like that can and has happened before.

    --
    Life is not for the lazy.
  22. Re:Allready Hacked.. Wrong product by sonik1 · · Score: 3, Informative

    This article refers to a disposable camcorder, not camera.

  23. Re:Now we will get "video" images from battlefield by geomon · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What else can I send over to the troops other than books and playing cards? I have a contact at work who arranges to have stuff shipped to Iraq on transports ferrying supplies.

    I know that boredom killers are in high demand. I tried to get month-old magazines, but the local vendor said they get shipped back to the publisher for back issues. I've been looking for stuff that can be left behind and traded.

    Any suggestions?

    --
    "Rocky Rococo, at your cervix!"
  24. Re:Now we will get "video" images from battlefield by fishbowl · · Score: 2, Informative
    "considering that U.S. Army personnel are spending a year at a time in remote places, they're amassing quite a savings"

    Oh, really?

    Did your recruiting officer tell you that?

    Lucrative gig, soldiering, eh?

    --
    -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
  25. Why is this posted? by Eunuch · · Score: 4, Funny

    Nerds seek the singularity, and sex is a distraction. Your post is both unoriginal and irrelevant.

    --
    Transcend Humanity. Please.
    1. Re:Why is this posted? by Roland+of+Gilead · · Score: 2, Funny
      Your post is both unoriginal and irrelevant.
      You may be right... but his/her post still made me LOL. Time to find a source for these cams!
  26. not disposable... recyclable by mabu · · Score: 2, Informative

    Technically, the camera's batteries and its packaging are disposable, but everything else is recycled, so it's more a "recyclable" than a "disposable" unit.

  27. Re:Now we will get "video" images from battlefield by StandardDeviant · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Which is more threatening to the powers that be?

    Pen vs. Sword, Act III Scene 2...

  28. Re:Wait a second... by fishbowl · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "A camcorder that records onto a digital card is disposable...how?"

    Proprietary battery? One-way moulded case containing the media? Real crypto?

    Those of us who remember Super-8 film, remember paying $6.00 (1978 dollars!) for the three minute and twenty second film cartridge, and another $8.00 to develop it.

    >Who needs a camcorder like that?

    I'm sure if it's sold in the right shops at the right places, tons of people will buy them. They will be sold to people before embarking on day cruises (even people with real cameras hate seawater spray. Would you take your Canon XL2 on a Zodiac?) They will be bought dozens at a time for wedding guests or corporate meetings. How do you suppose a waterproof version would do at a dive or surf shop?

    People pay $12.00 for a 24-exposure C41 camera today, and another $10-12 to develop the film. Hell, *I* have even done this, and I have a very good digital SLR, a good digital point-and-shoot, and a respectable film SLR system. I've still found reasons to buy these things from time to time, sometimes for the waterproof Kodak, sometimes only to avoid standing out or being singled out, and occassionally because I enjoy working within the limitations of a given medium.

    Nobody "needs" a camcorder like that. But they will be purchased, along with bugspray, sunblock, and a bag of cheetos. I'm sure I'll even try one.

    One thing though, if it does turn out to be hackable, I assume I'll never see one. Just like I never saw an Iopener or a CueCat or a Nintendo glove or a Juicebox.

    --
    -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
  29. Re:Battery Life? by ReverendLoki · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Probably not easily accessible (at least no more accessible than the memory), but even if it's not accessible, it should surely be replaceable. I'm starting to think that, when these get hacked, I might have to pick one up.

    Hell, pick up several - I think this one could catch on more than the disposable digital stills. Attach one to your RC airplane and play CIA with it... even better if you can hook up a wireless feed! Or use a ziplock bag to make you're own underwater camera. I know there's a lot of things I would risk doing with this that I'd never use our expensive "real" camcorder for.

    --
    09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
  30. WOW! by MightyMartian · · Score: 3, Funny

    First disposable condoms and coffee enemas, and now this! Truly we are at the dawn of a great age. What's next? Clean hookers? Quick somebody grab Dvorak! I need to know.

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  31. Re:Memory erasing? by juglugs · · Score: 3, Funny

    Paris? Is that you?

    --
    This sig is in Spanish when you're not looking....
  32. Perfect uses? by timothy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This looks great (as someone else has linked to in this thread) for aerial photography, whether by kite or rocket -- the sort of thing that you don't want to risk an expensive camera with.

    What other things would you use this for? Underwater robots? Car-attached home-made action shots? Glued to back of pet turtle?

    There have to be some cool applications for which a $30 video camera would be perfect ;)

    timothy

    --
    jrnl: http://tinyurl.com/c2l8yr / foes: http://tinyurl.com/ckjno5
  33. Non-disposable equivalent on sale at Target by StefanJ · · Score: 2, Informative

    (Note: I have no financial or emotional connection with the company that makes the products mentioned below. I just want to point out that for a little more you can have to keep a far more flexible product.)

    This week, Target is selling for $97 the non-disposable equivalent of this gimmick, the Aiptek "IS-DV."

    The IS stands for "Image Stabilization."

    It records to internal memory or a SD stick. A 256 mb stick holds about 60 minutes of MPEG4 video.

    It is also a still camera (5 mp, but with a non-adjustable lens), voice recorder, and MP3 player. It comes with a tripod, A/V cable, headphones, and USB cable.

    I've had an earlier version, the DV4500, for about six months. It's a great little toy. I bought it so I'd have a cheap camera I wouldn't be afraid to carry around everywhere. The image quality is pretty good:

    http://home.comcast.net/~stefan_jones/valley_view_ wide.JPG

    The video quality is "OK." Note that this film was done under less than optimal lighting conditions:

    http://home.comcast.net/~stefan_jones/kira_jumps_h oop.asf (3.3 mb ASF video)

    I bought a IS-DV so I can give the DV4500 to a relative.

    Stefan

  34. I can see some markets by ReidMaynard · · Score: 2, Interesting

    like wedding receptions, instead of disposable still cameras.

    --
    -- www.globaltics.net

    Political discussion for a new world

  35. Re:Now we will get "video" images from battlefield by CAIMLAS · · Score: 2, Informative

    Breakfree CLP. Wonderful gun cleaning/lubricant. AR15 rifles such as they're using over there jam all the time due to the high amounts of dust and the high precision of those specific rifles. They have to clean them constantly.

    Breakfree CLP is a non-oily lubricant, so it won't inherrently collect dust while still lubricating and protecting, helping prevent various malfunctions.

    Considering the time they spend cleaning their guns (I would hope quite a lot, so they continue to fire for them when needed - I know the Marines do), and how long it takes to properly break down an AR15 ("M4" in military parlance, I guess), it would be greatly appreciated, I'm sure.

    You could try sending them stuff like Guns & Ammo - give the magazine a call, they might be able to give you a discount rate (or simply ship a couple extras for you to send over). They're good Americans, generally speaking.

    --
    ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
  36. Re:Don't fill the earth with trash. by slimy_dude · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Actually, what this company is suggesting is superior to recycling. The cameras themselves are reusable. So, rather than say melting the plastics and reforming them (which itself would be difficult if at all possible), the camera frame can be used verbatim without expending the large energy costs associated with recycling.

    Give me reuse over recycling any day.

  37. Re:20 Minutes? Why bother? by timeOday · · Score: 3, Insightful
    but with only 20 minutes of what is probably lo-res video, why would anyone bother?
    shoot it up in a model rocket

    keep it in your glove box in case of who-knows-what (Rodney King II?)

    take it mountain biking to get clips of your buddies

    on vacation when you forget your real camcorder

    as a kids' toy

    set them out on the tables at a wedding party for the guests to film each other and leave you advice

  38. Re:Wait a second... by RichardX · · Score: 2, Funny

    Hey, c'mon, that's not fair.
    Lexmark make exceedingly good doorstops!

    Ohhhh.. you wanted to use it for printing?

    --
    Curiosity was framed. Ignorance killed the cat.
  39. Re:Wait a second... by Kadin2048 · · Score: 2, Informative

    It would be better called a "one time use" video camera: like the cameras, both film and digital of the same name.

    I worked at a major camera-store chain (rhymes with 'zits') a while back, right when they first came out with one time use digital cameras. We were actively discouraged from calling them "disposable," because in reality they were anything but. In order for the company to make a profit, each one had to go out and back at least twice, I think. Probably that number went down as they made more of them, but at least at the beginning they were definitely being 'rented' out for below actual value / manufacturing cost. When they came back to the store, the photos got downloaded (through a proprietary port/interface) and then the camera body was sent back to be refurbished and repackaged.

    I assume these video cameras are the same way. It's a natural extension of the technology. I just wonder what the video quality is like.

    --
    "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
  40. As expensive as phone sex! by gbulmash · · Score: 2, Insightful
    The "one-time-use" camera sells for $29.99. When you're done shooting your 20 minutes of video, you return it and pay $12.99 to get the video transferred to DVD.

    That's $42.98 per use... $2.15 cents per minute... not including sales tax.

    Though people talk about hacking it, the people who could hack it are not the target market for it, as they can figure out how to use their camcorders and DVD burners.

    - Greg

  41. Re:Now we will get "video" images from battlefield by mrmeval · · Score: 2, Informative

    A SureFire 6P. Add on 120 lumen bulb. The waterproof holder for a spare and six batteries. A tactical speed holster. Two boxes of twelve batteries. Shock proof bezel if weapon mounting is wanted.
    http://www.surefire.com/

    If you have the bux an aftermarket mount and squeeze switch for it so it can be put on an M16.
    I need to find my supplier for this.

    A good knife from http://www.sharppointythings.com/ the Battle Bitch is sweet but a simple Cold Steel smachet or tanto is nice. It's not an online store but an email will get a quote.

    Any small card game, you'd be surprised how well Steve Jackson's games go over. They are small and portable and fun.
    http://www.sjgames.com/

    There is another site for really cheap cool card games but I've lost it.

    --
    I'd go on a Vegan diet but the delivery time from Vega is too long. --brownkitty