Slashdot Mirror


Jeff Bezos's Space Company Reveals Some Secrets

An anonymous reader writes "Jeff Bezos's commercial spaceflight company, Blue Origin, has kept its plans secret to better compete with rivals such as Richard Branson's Virgin Galactic. But in order to build its launch facility in West Texas, it has revealed some details of its future operations: Blue Origin's Reusable Launch Vehicle (RLV) will carry three or more passengers on suborbital, ballistic trajectories to altitudes in excess of 325,000 feet above sea level. It will launch vertically and land vertically, and will use hydrogen peroxide and kerosene as propellants. It will operate autonomously under control of on-board computers, with no ground control. Blue Origin plans a maximum rate of 52 launches per year."

28 of 240 comments (clear)

  1. Culberson County by ChrisF79 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I don't know about this one. "Culberson County, we have a problem" just doesn't have a good ring to it.

    --
    Finance tutorials and more! Understandfinance
    1. Re:Culberson County by jdray · · Score: 3, Funny

      "All your passengers are belong to us."

      Maybe not...

      --
      The Spoon
      Updated 6/28/2011
  2. Prediction... by It+doesn't+come+easy · · Score: 4, Funny

    Look for life insurance policies to have a new clause added to explicitly exclude coverage in the event of a spacecraft mishap (if they don't already have such a clause).

    --
    The NSA: The only part of the US government that actually listens.
  3. No problems here by DragonMageWTF · · Score: 5, Funny

    will use hydrogen peroxide and kerosene as propellants. It will operate autonomously under control of on-board computers, with no ground control.

    No problems what so ever. Sounds incredibly safe to me.

    1. Re:No problems here by Timesprout · · Score: 5, Funny

      It is, all the rocket side of the business will be subcontracted to Acme, they have been in the business for years and really know their stuff.

      --
      Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
      What truth?
      There is no dupe
  4. Unlimited flights for $79 a year? by AtariAmarok · · Score: 5, Funny
    "Blue Origin's Reusable Launch Vehicle (RLV) will carry three or more passengers"

    As long as the passengers after the flight are reusable too, it should be a workable, safe plan. However, could we claim spaceflights under the "Amazon Prime Plan", which claims "Unlimited shipping privileges cost just $79 per year"? After all, it all boils down to being shipped by Amazon.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
    1. Re:Unlimited flights for $79 a year? by antifoidulus · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yeah, but you would have to make the whole journey in a brown box with a smile on it.

  5. interface by justforaday · · Score: 5, Funny

    Apparently, the interface for the vehicle will be a single button with the word "click" stenciled underneath it.

    --
    I'll turn into a supernova and burn up everything. Well I'll turn into a black little hole and you'll turn into string.
    1. Re:interface by Anne_Nonymous · · Score: 5, Funny

      From the article:

      "Astronauts will be protected from massive the G-forces of liftoff by being shrink-wrapped to a piece of cardboard and surrounded on three sides by AirPak (TM)."

    2. Re:interface by Knight2K · · Score: 4, Funny

      If you press it, the label changes to "Do not press this button again."

      --
      ======
      In X-Windows the client serves YOU!
  6. Sign me up! by Ridgelift · · Score: 4, Funny
    It will operate autonomously under control of on-board computers, with no ground control.
    Sounds great! Put me on the list, with one provision: if an announcement is made that "Microsoft will partner with Blue Origin to provide software" then forget it, I'm not goin'
  7. Re:Cue the unmanned spaceflight mob by AtariAmarok · · Score: 5, Funny
    "Cue the unmanned-spaceflight-is-the-only-way-to-go zealots..."

    I suggest a compromise with these "unmanned spaceflght zealots". We send each of them up in a manned spaceflight. At some pre-determined point, the spacecraft is programmed to become unmanned due to explosive decompression of the passenger compartment. Then, the flight continues on, unmanned. Everybody's happy.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  8. Next: eBay by AtariAmarok · · Score: 5, Funny
    Next thing you know, eBay will offer spaceflights, too. Just read the negative feedback carefully, and look for things like:

    "The TANG was stale"

    "Space captain farted in airlock and refused to provide refund"

    "Unsecured lunch lockers: tribbles ate my sandwich"

    "I am a smoker, and was told that smokers had to step outside during spaceflight. Do NOT buy!"

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  9. not bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    at one launch per week, it wouldnt take more than a year or two to send prety much everyone i dont like into space. ^_^

  10. 52 Launches a year? by lintocs · · Score: 5, Funny

    I guess weekly launches aren't unattainable, as long as there's no requirement for an equal number of landings, and a large supply of launch vehicles.

    S

  11. Re:Landing vertically by WolfWithoutAClause · · Score: 5, Funny
    Actually, it's not too bad. You need about 10% of the landing weight of the vehicle to be fuel.

    However, it more or less has to be computer controlled descent; the timing is a bit critical.

    The description I heard was:

    You're coming in and you think the engines should fire soon, otherwise you're going to die.

    Then you think it's got to fire now, otherwise you're dead.

    Then you fall some more.

    Then you *know* your going to die.

    And then they fire, and then you land.

    Then you go change your trousers.

    --

    -WolfWithoutAClause

    "Gravity is only a theory, not a fact!"
  12. Re:Price? by phyruxus · · Score: 4, Funny

    clarification: one Silicon Valley house mortgage.

    --
    "A witty saying proves nothing." ~Voltaire
    "d'Oh!" ~Homer
  13. One click launch sequence? by Frank+T.+Lofaro+Jr. · · Score: 4, Funny

    Would he have a one click launch sequence?
    Would he patent it?

    --
    Just because it CAN be done, doesn't mean it should!
  14. Land vertically? by 3770 · · Score: 4, Funny


    This thing is supposed to land vertically? That sounds more like a crash to me.

    Will it have parachutes?

    --
    The Internet is full. Go Away!!!
  15. The response is even worse by That's+Unpossible! · · Score: 4, Funny

    "WTF do you want us to do about it, all the guidance computers are on your ship!"

    --
    Ironically, the word ironically is often used incorrectly.
  16. Re:Missiles by AtariAmarok · · Score: 3, Funny
    "[cheap intercontinental ballistic missiles] Carrying people and cargo instead of nuclear weapons. Quite an improvement I'd say."

    You are going to have to have an awfully slick sales pitch to get over the fact that the flights always end with 600 mp/h impact at former Soviet Union strategic targets. Other than that, it's a great flight, man!

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  17. Re:Price? by Da+Fokka · · Score: 4, Funny

    Exactly US $TOOMUCH. Don't know exactly what that is in Euros, though.

    €5,64. Gotta love the current exchange rates!

  18. Re:Welcome to Van Horn, Texas! by VikingDBA · · Score: 3, Funny

    "I'd rather go to hell than texas."

    It's just a bit further down the road, just keep goin'.

  19. Re:Space company? by Momoru · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yup...and he has already patented the "One-Click Launch Sequence"

  20. Re:So the question is... by tocs · · Score: 3, Funny

    Yes, but you would have to go first.

  21. And afterwards... by Kozar_The_Malignant · · Score: 4, Funny

    You're still in Texas. Sheesh! I though the idea was to escape.

    --
    Some mornings it's hardly worth chewing through the restraints to get out of bed.
  22. Morbid humor... by KC7GR · · Score: 3, Funny

    "It will operate autonomously under control of on-board computers, with no ground control..."

    This could certainly add new meaning to the phrase "Blue Screen of Death."

    I'll wager that they'll never get guv'mint approval to operate without at least one human pilot.

    Keep the peace(es).

    --

    Bruce Lane, KC7GR,

    Blue Feather Technologies

  23. Re:Stale tang by AtariAmarok · · Score: 3, Funny
    "I've never heard of Tang going stale"

    You are so right. It is a very bad example, like "ape going ugly".

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.