Paul Graham Describes Dangers of Spam Blacklists
CRoby writes "Paul Graham posted an essay describing the danger and corruption of the main spammer blacklists today. It discusses MAPS and the SBL, the blacklist created to try to alleviate the abuses of MAPS, and suggests (maybe) another blacklist's creation."
$idea will not help cut down on spam. In fact, it is detrimental. This has been know for $num_years years, but I feel I must prove that I am really smart by writing an article about it.
In Soviet Russia; old, tired, worn-out joke tells you
Blacklists have a structural flaw: there is no one to watch the watchers.
Lisa: If you're the police, who will police the police?
Homer: I 'unno, Coast Guard?
Okay, so a philosopher, a philologist, and a philatelist walk into a bar...
Just block the sub net 0.0.0.0
If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
That makes a defamation / slander / libel suit much easier, not harder.
What I'm listening to now on Pandora...
Here is my very own private /etc/mail/access blocklist which I use on my own mail server:
"A much better way to cut down on spam is to use $technology_I_created."
Ironically, the word ironically is often used incorrectly.
For any serious stuff, don't accept an IP address which was blacklisted in the past few years (is there a service which checks this?) or is close to current blacklist entries, unless you're really really well known.
That would be hard to check (by the ISP as well), and is increasingly rare. It'll have to be outside of 0.0.0.0/0