Looking at a Martian Aurora Borealis
mike_1138 writes "According to new research, 'The Martian auroras differ from those on Earth, Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus and Neptune...' I've seen the Borealis here on Earth, and they're beautiful. I can't imagine what they must look like in a Martian night."
New Slashdot category -- things we can't imagine...
Of course they're different...the Martians are causing them to strobe out the message 'Keep your junk off our planet'.
Too bad no one on Earth understands Martian Morse code...
^_^
____
~ |rip/\/\aster /\/\onkey
Or on Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus and Neptune either I assume.
I've seen the Borealis here on Earth, and they're beautiful. I can't imagine what they must look like in a Martian night.
Well, considering they're estimated to be about 1% as powerful, I'd have to venture a guess that they really don't look like much at all. At least not in visible light.
And all our yesterdays have lighted fools The way to dusty death. --Will
southern hemispher auroras are called Aurora Australis. Nothern Hemisphere auroras are Aurora Borealis.
...burn more.
It's hard enough to get me out for this sort of thing when it's 0F. At -100F, it better be REALLY, REALLY pretty.
Actually, I have to correct an error in my previous post...the magnetic field strength of the Martian crust is 400 nT...compared to Earth's 3000 nT, it's a far cry from 'nearly as strong'.
As for the solar winds, an insufficiently strong magnetic field would contribute to the solar wind eroding both the surface and the atmosphere over time.
____
~ |rip/\/\aster /\/\onkey
I can't imagine what they must look like in a Martian night
I can't either. They should take a picture of it.
Looking at Mars' Atmosphere there is substantially less atmospheric oxygen, nitrogen, and argon on the red planet.
Since, Earth's Aurora is caused by the magnectic excitation of ions in the atmosphere, namely the O2 and N2 -- I imagine the "Aurora Martiania" would be a lot less intense. Also, because there's a greater distance to Mars from the Sun, I would also think the intensity of the magnetic 'bursts' would be smaller (due to lambertian emission, i.e. equidirectional).
But, since "they've" detected *something*, it's reasonable to say there is an aurora present on Mars. I would wait on booking your MLT vacation until some hard evidence comes in...
and now back to the fallout shelter...
Aurora on Jupiter: http://msslhx.mssl.ucl.ac.uk/~npm/Web_Pages/Visito r_Pages/aurora/Jupiter_aurora.gif
Aurora on Saturn: http://www.mssl.ucl.ac.uk/pages/general/news/satur ns_aurora/assets/saturn_aurora.jpg
Uranus and Neptune probably have them too, but are too far away to see them clearly from Earth-based telescopes.
However, because Mars' magnetic field is too weak to create the phenomenon by similar means, the aurora is caused by a separate mechanism, namely the magnetic anomalies described in the article, which can occur anywhere on the planet. For this reason, it should not be called aurora borealis or aurora australis, but rather aurora [insert god of magnetic rocks here].