Slashdot Mirror


Censored Nagasaki Bomb Story Found

EccentricAnomaly writes "In 1945 journalist George Weller snuck past the American occupying forces and became the first American Journalist to see the devastation left by the atomic bomb that fell on Nagasaki. His story infuriated MacArthur, who had it quashed. The Japanese paper, Mainichi, has now published Weller's account. CNN has a story discussing how it was found." From the Mainichi article: "As one whittles away at embroidery and checks the stories, the impression grows that the atomic bomb is a tremendous, but not a peculiar weapon. The Japanese have heard the legend from American radio that the ground preserves deadly irradiation. But hours of walking amid the ruins where the odor of decaying flesh is still strong produces in this writer nausea, but no sign or burns or debilitation."

9 of 1,246 comments (clear)

  1. Re:So what happened to this reporter? Cancer? by syylk · · Score: 5, Informative

    Actually, no.

    He died in 2002, a whopping 57 years after his "walk in the atomic park".

  2. Re:So what happened to this reporter? Cancer? by Trurl's+Machine · · Score: 4, Informative

    Actually, he died 3 years ago having lived probably longer than you or me: he was 95.

  3. Utter and total bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    No matter how often you say it, it still doesn't make it true.

    The argument that it save a million lives has been refuted time and time again. First of all the casualty figures are far from certain and it's far from certain that these were indeed that casulty figures the US had to expect had an invasion taken place.
    Further, there are rather strong arguments for the assumption that Japane would have surrendered without an invasion and without the use of atomic bombs.
    Finally, you discard all the eveidence that has been brougth to light by historians that suggests that the US did indeed have at least some additional reasons for using the atomic bombs, namely the begining confrontation with the Soviet Union.

    Just one quote for you:

    ""...in [July] 1945... Secretary of War Stimson, visiting my headquarters in Germany, informed me that our government was preparing to drop an atomic bomb on Japan. I was one of those who felt that there were a number of cogent reasons to question the wisdom of such an act. ...the Secretary, upon giving me the news of the successful bomb test in New Mexico, and of the plan for using it, asked for my reaction, apparently expecting a vigorous assent.

    "During his recitation of the relevant facts, I had been conscious of a feeling of depression and so I voiced to him my grave misgivings, first on the basis of my belief that Japan was already defeated and that dropping the bomb was completely unnecessary, and secondly because I thought that our country should avoid shocking world opinion by the use of a weapon whose employment was, I thought, no longer mandatory as a measure to save American lives. It was my belief that Japan was, at that very moment, seeking some way to surrender with a minimum loss of 'face'. The Secretary was deeply perturbed by my attitude..."

    - Dwight Eisenhower, Mandate For Change, pg. 380

    In a Newsweek interview, Eisenhower again recalled the meeting with Stimson:

    "...the Japanese were ready to surrender and it wasn't necessary to hit them with that awful thing."

    - Ike on Ike, Newsweek, 11/11/63 "
    http://www.doug-long.com/quotes.htm

    Finally:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atomic_bombings_of_Hi roshima_and_Nagasaki
    How about going there and learn yourself...

  4. *Speak* softly. by frostman · · Score: 4, Informative

    I believe the actual quote is Speak softly and carry a big stick.

    http://www.whitehouse.gov/history/presidents/tr26. html

    --

    This Like That - fun with words!

  5. Hiroshima by sodaquad · · Score: 4, Informative

    If you found this interesting you might want to read John Hersey's account of the Hiroshima bomb. Published in 1946 and still in print, it's pretty much the definitive version.

    It's written in an extraordinarily calm style, almost without emotion, but is strangly fascinating and moving.

    Try a search for 'Hiroshima John Hersey'.

  6. Re:hypocrisy? by kahei · · Score: 4, Informative

    The Rest of the World will not deal with our stupidy much longer.

    Much of this 'overgrown bully' stuff is true. The trouble is that the rest of the world is no better, indeed much of it is undeniably even worse. Don't expect that when America's luck runs out the next big kid will be nicer.

    --
    Whence? Hence. Whither? Thither.
  7. Re:So what happened to this reporter? Cancer? by DenDave · · Score: 4, Informative

    Fat Man was 21 kt yield as I recall.. The fireball ascended into the wind and fallout was not over ground zero. The black rain fell over Nishiyama, to the east.

    There is still some residual radiation but surpisingly, the vast majority of radioactive fall-out pollution in the region is due to US atmospheric testing in the 50's, and that was way off in the Pacific!

    The neutron radiation is also negligable compared to the background pollution.

    --
    -if at first you don't succeed, stay the heck away from paragliding.
  8. Re:NYT Lies About Hiroshima and Gets Pulitzer by neomantra · · Score: 5, Informative

    A form of Pentagon-supported censorship...

    http://www.democracynow.org/static/hiroshima.shtml

    Summary:
    After the bomb drop on Hiroshima, press are confined to a barge off the coast of Japan. Wilfred Burchett, an independent journalist, decides to go and see things first hand and writes about it ("I write these facts as dispassionately as I can in the hope that they will act as a warning to the world."). William L. Laurence of the New York Times, and on the Pentagon payroll, writes a series of stories discrediting Burchett and gets the Pulitzer Price. Democracy Now is trying to get the Pulitzer stripped from the NYT.

    (sorry, accidentally pushed submit instead of preview)

  9. Re:So what happened to this reporter? Cancer? by adrianbaugh · · Score: 4, Informative

    I would say that walking around in a heavy fallout zone is an extremely unhealthy activity

    Hiroshima and Nagasaki were both classical airburst detonations. These typically produce low local fallout as the radioactive material is mostly swept up into the stratosphere as the fireball rises. Although there were certainly many cancer cases, most of these were caused by prompt radiation (ie gamma and neutrons directly from the nuclear reactions in the fireball), and that prompt radiation dies away very quickly (hours rather than days).

    I wouldn't like to walk around in a heavy fallout zone either, but those are generally associated with groundbursts or radiological devices rather than airbursts. So I think this reporter was probably okay. See the FAQ at nuclearweaponarchive.org for more info.

    --
    "'I pass the test,' she said. 'I will diminish, and go into the West, and remain Galadriel.'"
    - JRR Tolkien.