Slashdot Mirror
AOL Hopes to Change Image With Services
Geoffrey writes "'In an effort to earn a new reputation as a leading Internet destination, AOL will open up to a wider audience on the Web through AOL.com. The portal will re-launch in beta form on Tuesday, offering visitors free Web mail, exclusive audio and video content, and access to a number of AOL services previously available only to subscribers,' reports BetaNews. The new AOL.com will highlight news from the blogosphere, offer free access to 15,000 videos, 130 radio stations, and 20 XM stations. In addition, AOL is launching an RSS aggregator that aims to make RSS actually simple for normal Web users. And unlike MSN's RSS endeavor, My AOL will work in Firefox, Safari and other browsers."
I hate to break the news to you but you are 12 years too late.
I think that AOL will always have a stigma with geeks of being a piece of crap. And to tell you the truth, I have a bad feeling that this new service set will only confirm that stereotype.
Just need one more referral for a
They want their crappy ISP back.
Trolling the trolls who troll the trolls since '92
" All your RSS are belong to us..."
All your user base are belong to us.
-- The rest of the Internet's ISPs
Does anyone out there think that this will work? Personally, I think that the only thing that has kept AOL from folding is the sheer size of their original user base. But they are dropping off like flies due to broadband.
I would be very surprised if they could pull this off.
Sounds to me like a bait 'n switch. If they're going to offer these free services, rest assured they're going to try and pound a subscription up your ass every step of the way.
AOL is launching an RSS aggregator that aims to make RSS actually simple
I notice they don't intend to change what kind of users they want to attract. I mean, how hard is it to use RSS these days? it's just one click to install a RSS newsreader (unless they're running into Bezos' patent or something).
"A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
Everyone will like it because its logo will have the word "Beta" in a cute little font down in the corner.
It's the cool thing to do now, doncha know??
This would be a huge PR coup for AOL as well a boon for the open source community.
I actually got an AOL CD with my newspaper last week-end!
Agile Artisans
Maybe if they didn't make it a bitch to cancel the service, we wouldn't be afraid to try them out again.
Seriously, after canceling from them (I tried it for free for a month); I will never, ever, ever sign up with any of their services ever again.
They like to put you on hold, and then keep offering discounts, and finally they will cancel your account...if your nice to them...after about 25 minutes of bantering back and forth.
That is what ruined it for me. The free CD's don't even bother me.
I am sorry to say this but just because all the services that they are now happily giving away will NOT make them a better service provider. If they could not provide good service to customers who paid 23.95/month how can anyone expect that the free users will get a better service?
Are they pulling from AOL blogs? I always wanted to have a collection of stories from high school girls about the prom and make-up.
If you are interested in the developments of the RSS reader you can check out some of the blogs by the folks working on the reader such as Steve Rider and Sanaz Ahari.
Disclaimer: I work at MSN"me too"
"Look Lois, the two symbols of the Republican Party: an elephant, and a fat white guy who is threatened by change."
You have the user base
You have the manpower
You have the money.
Now go forth and make yourself into an ISP that doesn't suck.
There is a long road ahead of you though.
Pretty Pictures!
I'm not even sure that's really the problem with AOL. Most of these services are already being provided by independant web sites or are rolled into the user homepage of many broadband ISPs. Why bother going to another page to get substandard audio/video feeds when your SBC/Roadrunner/whatever homepage does most (if not all) of that for you? I don't think anybody is really in the mood for another AOL browser on top of this.
Most people I know don't even associate AIM with AOL, and when that's the case, providing content that's been available through other portals for years will be quite a stretch to save the company. Catching up with the times alone will take a lot of work, but they can't be 'as modern as their competitors' to survive. They're going to need to be much more advanced to shoot past everyone else and escape the grim fate that looms overhead.
Perfecting Discordia
www.stevenvansickle.com
I think this is a good thing. Why? Because I collect email addresses. I already have two aim accounts (gaim is my best friend!) so there's two new email accounts right there. Add them to the two gmail accounts, two yahoo accounts, a netscape mail account, 5 hotmail addresses, and 3 corporate emails. Now I'm up to 15 email addresses!
Free MacMini
AOL has brand name recognition with just about everyone in the U.S. The trouble is, when I think of AOL I think of those stacks of CDs in the Wal-Mart checkout isle and the endcaps at supermarkets. I don't think about any content I'd like to see there, despite the number of "content parters" they've signed up over the years.
It's the same reason Compuserve is such a non-player on the Internet. The industry shifted out from underneath them.
AOL wasted way too much corporate energy convincing their customers that they were the Internet, and didn't expend enough effort drawing in non-AOL dialup users with their content. Didn't they sign up exclusive content, so you couldn't get there unless you subscribed to AOL?
They're now paying for misreading the market, for not realizing that the money was in clicks, not in subscriptions.
sigs, as if you care.
A few years ago, I'm sure plenty of people told the Google guys that they were a few years too late for making a search engine.
AOL's problem is the Internet-for-beginners stigma that's attached to their name. My bet is the better move would be to dump their millions into a new brand, push their current user base towards it, and hope the non-AOL users will underestimate the connection.
Disclaimer: I work at MSN
Son, you'd best get outta town. Them men over there wit' th' penguins on their jackets just drew a bunch of guns.
Slashdottersville: Where The Good Guys Wear Red Hats
When Time Warner and AOL merged, the word was that AOL was going to become a media mega-empire of the Internet, that we would see all these exclusive and great media services streamed from AOL. You know, wild ideas like watching TV on the Internet and having the ability to send fullscreen video emails to your grandparents with no hassle.
Instead, we have TiVO and Skype and Windows Media Center and the saddest part of it all is AOL is losing out to broadband. Wouldn't that get the IRONIC tag on Fark?
- Bloated Client
- Treating its clients poorly
- Making the dollar its first and highest priority, and being obvious about it.
- Not truly changing with the times, instead just putting a new gloss(and more bloat)to its same, tired, design.
- Using spam type methods to try and hook new users(the famous coasters).
They did this to themselves through years of mismanagement and just settling for the status quo. They forgot they got to the top by out-innovating the competition like compuserve and prodigy, and making a smooth efficient internet portal for the time. Its like what happened to Netscape. Netscape was "the" browser because it was small, fast, efficient, and clean. When it bloated it died and took it mozilla and a reversion to its original design to bring it back.
The question is, can AOL really revert and recover from 10 years of bad reputation? I don't think it ever will.
You are who you are, let no one tell you different. But, never close your mind to a new point of view.
In 1978 everyone had to have a CB radio. In 2000 everyone had to be in an IRC chatroom. In 2005 everyone has to have a blog. Same sh*t, different box.