Slashdot Mirror


Linux HiFi: The Sonos Digital Music System

TractorJector writes "Mad Penguin published a 5 page review of the Sonos Digital Music System, a wireless music distribution system built on Linux. According to the site, you can use a single remote to control up to 32 "zones" (locations throughout your house where the receivers are placed). The interface is intuitive and well done for such a compact device. According to the review, it's extremely simple to setup as well."

31 of 183 comments (clear)

  1. ... neat idea ... by ninjagin · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I looked at this system awhile back, but it seems a little too costly.

    I ended up just putting a computer with some decent speakers in each room I wanted music and accessing my music files over my existing network.

    One thing in Sonos' favor is that their system is a lot more consumer-accessible.

    Very neat.

    --
    .. pa-ra-bo-la, pa-ra-bo-la, 2 pi R, 2 pi R, where's your latus rectum, where's your latus rectum, 2 pi R
  2. ipod clickwheel by x102output · · Score: 2, Interesting

    i wonder if they will get sued for apple, or got the proper rights for that clickwheel

    1. Re:ipod clickwheel by y2dt · · Score: 2, Informative

      Apple does't make the click wheel for the iPods. They buy them from Synaptics, the same company that makes touch pads for laptops.

      These guys probably got them from Synaptics too.

  3. Scalability by ndansmith · · Score: 2, Funny

    What if your house only has one zone? Do you still have to pay full price?

    1. Re:Scalability by justforaday · · Score: 5, Funny

      And why is there no bathroom zone in their screenshot? They'd better have a toilet icon, or I'm not getting this...

      --
      I'll turn into a supernova and burn up everything. Well I'll turn into a black little hole and you'll turn into string.
  4. Scroll wheel by Dark+Paladin · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Looks like a very cool system - well outside my price range (and with 3 small children, outside of my "what can my heart stand when the little buggers touch the expensive equipment").

    My only question is on the school wheel interface. My understanding is that Apple had purchased the rights to use the patents to the scroll wheel touchpad system for their technologies (I don't recall the actual patent holder). Does this mean that Sony's scroll wheel is not touch pad based (could be a physical wheel and *not* violate the patent, I guess), or did they also get a piece of the patent license somehow?

    Just curious.

    1. Re:Scroll wheel by ductormalef · · Score: 3, Informative

      I asked them this exact question at CES in Vegas. First off, it IS a touch-sensitive scroll wheel. Second, they said they had someone else design it and got around the patents somehow (this was their salesperson speaking, not their patent attorney). Anyone from Sonos care to weigh in.

      --
      The Fat Man Walks Alone
  5. Seems pretty expensive by Roginator · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I could buy a cheapo $299 Dell for each bedroom, network them wirelessly to a huge 300GB drive and have far more functionality than this setup. Am I wrong?

    1. Re:Seems pretty expensive by generic-man · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yes. The $299 Dells don't have surround-sound-out or wireless, you would have to rig up a PDA or laptop as the wireless controller, and the towers are much larger than the Sonos stations. You would also lose out on the ability to play the same thing in multiple zones all at once without some careful synchronization (also not easy).

      --
      For more information, click here.
    2. Re:Seems pretty expensive by RapmasterT · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I could buy a cheapo $299 Dell for each bedroom, network them wirelessly to a huge 300GB drive and have far more functionality than this setup. Am I wrong?
      No, you're not wrong, you're simply not in the target market for this device. Clearly they're marketing this at people who's first reaction WON'T be how much cheaper they could do it themselves

      Ultimately, they will reduce the price by about 50% or they will fail. I looked at the Sonos a while back and it was great, pretty much everything you could want in a multi-room wireless music distribution system, as long as money is no object.

      My only complaint is that by making it white and oddly sized, they made it look like a Mac Mini, not like a stereo component. I don't know why so many companies have such a difficult time understanding that oddly shaped/colored components may be a plus in the computer world, but not in the audio one.

    3. Re:Seems pretty expensive by dr.badass · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I could buy a cheapo $299 Dell for each bedroom, network them wirelessly to a huge 300GB drive and have far more functionality than this setup. Am I wrong?

      Yes. What you save in dollars you'll be spending tenfold in time.

      Stop thinking of price as something only measured in dollars and you'll better understand why people buy things like this when they could have something "better".

      --
      Don't become a regular here -- you will become retarded.
  6. Consider the list... by bedroll · · Score: 4, Funny

    of things that I don't need, can't afford, will never get, but want anyway, updated.

  7. Nope by Dorsai42 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Interlink Electronics http://interlinkelec.com/

    --
    If you forget about the future, the future will forget about you.
  8. Re:Not free by isometrick · · Score: 4, Informative

    I assume you are trolling, but here you go.

  9. What I hoped AirPortExpress would be by mfago · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The Sonos sounds more like what I had hoped the AirPortExpress would be: awesome looking remote control and multiple zones. Although Apple's product is much cheaper...

    Jobs has hinted at a remote control feature for AirportExpress, but nothing has materialized so far.

    1. Re:What I hoped AirPortExpress would be by generic-man · · Score: 2, Informative

      The Keyspan Express Remote plugs into the USB port on the Airport Express and lets you control playback. You still need a computer that broadcasts the music, just like the Sonos. Sadly. the Express Remote is nowhere near as cool as the Sonos remote.

      --
      For more information, click here.
  10. UPnP media player for linux by Hollins · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The biggest need I have in this realm is for a UPnP media player that runs under linux and can play streams from a Windows server. I'd be happy with one that only supports audio, but so far no dice. I'd like to interface with Real's Rhapsody from a Linux box.

    There seem to be plenty of UPnP servers being developed under Linux, but no clients.

    Are there proprietary codec issues that are hindering this?

  11. This is OK... But no AM/FM/XM/CD player options. by brundog · · Score: 5, Informative
    I looked heavily at a Sonos system and decided against it. Although it's got an incredible "coolness" factor to it, it's limited. There is no built-in support for AM/FM radio. XM Satellite radio or a CD player? Nope and nope.

    Therefore, what I did opt for is a system from Russound. Their "CA-Series" is very nice. Check them out at russound.com. I have two six-zone systems, creating a total of twelve integrated zones.

    You definitely loose the oohs-and-ahhs factor that Sonos brings with their remote LCD. However, when I walk into a room in my house, I can control that zone from any one of six sources: two AM/FM radio tuners, XM Satellite radio, a CD player, my MP3 collection, and even a cable TV feed. Yes, I can even tune the station I want on the radio, skip tracks on the CD player, etc.. This is all done via the in-wall control panel.

    It's not as [fancy|sexy|cool] as the Sonos, however, it's more functional for my listening style.

  12. Which is pretty much what you'd expect... by MattW · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Of course, the excellent is pretty much what you'd expect given that you're paying $1200 for a remote control and a pair of wireless bridge+tuner boxes.

  13. Expensive by anonicon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I checked this out via an ad at Engadget, and it is pretty nice, but man, that price tag is way too expensive to even consider them. While I like the remote control that has the built-in monitor (for the love of God, all remotes for small devices should have that, otherwise you can't see what you're navigating around in unless the player is at arm's length, in which case, who needs a remote?), $1199 for two wireless boxes and a remote w/monitor is waaaaaaay out of my price range.

  14. Slashvertisment? by mobby_6kl · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "[if (blahblah) and if (blahblah2)...] then the Sonos Digital Music System is for you. It's the current state of the art for wirelessly controlling music in a large home or business where you need just the right music in the right room at the right time.

    Analog loophole, analog loophole... a whole page raving about that and the fact that you can rip CDs to MP3s on your computer and play them on this thing! And there isn't even a single real-life photo, only those found on the official site. Nobody seems to be complaining about the slashvertisment now, eh?

  15. I have demo'd these by KenFury · · Score: 2, Informative

    The company I work for. http://magnoliaav.com/ sells these and I had a change to demo them for use on our network. We only used three zone but they were dead simple and worked great. If you can afford them (I can't) you will love it. Before I hear the cries of "astroturfing, astroturfing!" I did not submit the article.

  16. It's a pretty cool system... by loudgazelle · · Score: 4, Interesting

    My dad got the Sonos a couple of months ago, and I saw it in action last weekend. It's really cool stuff and well implemented.

    The big selling point for him was being able to have all the "zones" synchronously play the same song in every room. None of the other solutions he looked at were able to do that.

    As far as I remember, the scrool wheel doesn't move- it's touch based, like on the recent iPods.


    I just wish I had the money to buy one for myself...

    1. Re:It's a pretty cool system... by snookerdoodle · · Score: 2, Informative

      "The big selling point for him was being able to have all the "zones" synchronously play the same song in every room. None of the other solutions he looked at were able to do that."

      Squeezebox (www.slimdevices.com) does that, but isn't standalone and assumes you're providing the computer and hard drive holding your music collection. Each player ("zone") is $300 ($250 if you don't need wireless) and requires external amp/speakers. For those of us who like the sound of our existing systems, it seemed better.

      If you already have "Media PC's" hooked up, they can run the free and open source squeezeplayer software (really! they just give the stuff away!) and sync up along with the squeezeboxen.

      Again, my only point really was that squeezeboxen can be sync'ed if you wish.

      Mark

  17. Amp-less Version? by 706GL · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Couldn't they lower the price a little bit by selling a version of the box to integrate with your existing stereo. Just a receiver box with a RCA and digital output jack on the back. For a lot of applications I would image people already have the amp covered and don't need to spend the extra money on a part of the system that isn't going to get used.

    --
    ...
    1. Re:Amp-less Version? by .killedkenny · · Score: 2, Interesting

      www.slimdevices.com

      The Squeezebox is an excellent low-cost solution, especially if you already have amps and speakers, music ripped on a server, and a home network.

  18. Sonos vs. Airport Express vs. Cheapo Dells by kurkpeterman · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I see a lot of people out there discounting the capabilites of Sonos because they really don't understand what exactly the system does versus alternate setups. To be fair, Sonos competes directly with high-end multi-room, multi-source systems such as http://www.elanhomesystems.com/, http://www.crestron.com/, and http://www.amx.com/. All of these systems can cost tens of thousands of dollars for product/install and require that you hardwire your whole house.

    Sonos
    =-=-=
    *multi-room capability (control up to 32 rooms on one controller)
    *multi-source capability (play different songs in different rooms)
    *synchronization capability (play the same in different rooms, or in groups of different rooms)
    *built-in amplifier (not everyone has a speaker amp in each room)
    *line-out to existing amplifier (for those beefy existing home theatre setups)
    *line-in on each zoneplayer that can be streamed to any other zoneplayer (connect any legacy device like cd/dvd/tape/sat radio/etc.)
    *integration with music services (rhapsody)
    *integration with internet radio streams
    *wireless controller w/ lcd (huge benefit on getting the wife/gf to use it)
    *ease of use (anyone can use that scrollwheel interface)
    *ease of setup (not everyone is a tech)

    Now let's look at the other talked about solutions and compare their capabilities:

    Airport Express
    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
    *line-out to existing amplifier
    *can play one audio source at a time (so can either play on my computer, or my airport express)
    *walk back to computer each time you want to change anything

    Cheapo Dell ($500 - I have yet to actually see anyone get a computer for $299)
    =-=-=-=-=-=
    *computer functionality at each room [benefit, assuming you have a montior, keyboard, and mouse to take advantage of it]
    *no sychronization (might was well have a indepent cdplayers in each room and burn cds)
    *need powered speakers at each location (more $$$)
    *walk up to computer and change tracks on it

    Besides all the extra functionality (link/separting rooms of audio, rhapsody integration, ease of use/setup,...) everyone is missing the most important thing [and what makes the iPod so successful]. THE INTERFACE! Why do people buy iPods in droves instead of getting a regular flash/hard drive based player. It's because the iPod has blended simple but powerful functionality with elegant design. Sonos wireless lcd controller gives that same beautiful abstraction and gives *anyone* control of the audio in their house seamlessly.

  19. Rhapsody by MSG · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'm a RealNetworks employee, and we recently saw these things demoed after they added support for RealNetworks' Rhapsody service. Add a Rhapsody subscription to the cost of the device, and you get a massive library of music accessible for high-quality streaming. It was pretty impressive.

  20. WinXP 10/10 ; Linux 2/10 by meanfriend · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Hmmm, cool looking product but from looking at the last page of the article, the reviewer rates the ease of setup on WindowsXP 10/10 but gives the ease of linux setup as a measly 2/10.

    The reviewer said he had to ask the Sonos community (maybe a web forum?) for help getting it to work under Suse. Apparantly you need to run Samba for the Sonos controller to be able to access the music and gave the reviewer enough trouble that he writes:

    "For Linux wizards, this is probably just another opportunity to play and have fun, but for me it was some serious work, and I would not have been able to do it but for the graciousness of the Sonos community. "

    It seems that they haven't put a lot of polish on the linux support for the server end yet. I'm wondering why is there no NFS support which should do away with needing Samba... I have my entire music collection on an NFS share, and I'd expect any linux client to simply mount it over the network and away we go.

    Should we be giving much credit to a product just because it runs linux if it's really that difficult to make it play nicely with existing linux networks?

  21. Re:Roku Soundbridge by weinerdog97 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Happy Soundbridge owner. Awesome product and great support. The wireless can be flaky(check their compatible router list before buying), but they are constantly updating the functionality. And with a Rhapsody subscription to pipe through it, I pretty much don't buy cds any more....

  22. I'm a huge fan of this by anjrober · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'm thrilled to see this post and admittingly biased. I've had 4 ZonePlayers and 2 Controllers for a few months now and can't recommend them enough. I've plugged them into a B&W Speakers and they just rock.

    Why is Sonos great? (in no particular order)

    1. No need to put your MP3s on it's HD. You store them where you want and simply mount a drive
    2. A remote anyone can use with no training. My previous hacked together PocketPC device accessing internal website via 802 was a disaster.
    3. Use traditional audiophile grade gear (amps with sonos as preamp) and input devices (DVD, tape deck, LP, etc) as inputs to Sonos. Nothing beats an LP streamed all over the house
    4. Play multiple zones "in Sync" (all playing the same thing in time) or each zone plays what it wants
    5. It just works. Well. Hugely high Wife Acceptance Factor (WAF).
    6. Software upgrades (flashable ROM) to hardware. I've never got an upgrade to my old, black rack audio gear.
    7. water-resistant remote
    8. Desktop client, if you can't find a remote, use your laptop
    9. we just listen to more music.
    10. whole home networking without running wires (here in Boston, old home networking can be tough)
    11. programable interface
    12. active developers community

    What I don't love about Sonos:
    1. Cost
    2. No support for real/MS/quicktime, only shoutcast. For now, hoping for an upgrade

    That's really it. The wife and I just love it.
    I can't recommend it enough.

    Feel free to post questions about the devices if you like and I'll try to answer.