Slashdot Mirror


Space Ring Could Combat Global Warming

telstar writes "Though the debate continues around global warming, a new proposal suggests building an artificial space ring around the Earth to block the light of the sun and bring a balance to solar radiation, cloud cover, and heat-trapping greenhouse gases. The ring could be comprised of particles which would scatter the sunlight, or be built by an interconnected ring of spaceships aligned to block the light. The former proposal is estimated to cost anywhere from $6 trillion to $200 trillion dollars, while the spaceship solution would run approximately $500 billion. Halo fans rejoice."

5 of 955 comments (clear)

  1. So... why a ring? by Gaewyn+L+Knight · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Why not put a disk direct between us and the sun at a stable gravity point?

    We know how well solar eclipses work... why not just a permanent 'dimming'?

    --
    Telcos have alot of dark fibre in the States. Most people assume that's optical fibre...but it's actually moral fibre.
  2. $6-200 Trillion? by tyates · · Score: 4, Interesting

    They can't be serious. Who could fund this? Isn't World GDP only around $40-50T?

    --
    Tristan Yates
  3. Posting from the People's Republic of Fantasia ... by Namarrgon · · Score: 5, Interesting
    What about that interlocking ring of spaceships being an interlocking ring of solar panels? Then that blocked energy can get diverted to earth in a more desirable form (via microwave beamed to a stable superconducting space elevator, something we particularly like the idea of here in my country).

    That might even take the pressure off the environment, as you could probably shut down most of the world's coal-fired power stations.

    --
    Why would anyone engrave "Elbereth"?
  4. Re:Posting from the People's Republic of Fantasia by Chris+Burke · · Score: 4, Interesting

    But that heat would be taken out of the chunk we produce when we consume energy from other sources, so it is still a net gain on the inward flux. Reducing emissions by closing coal plants would increase the outward flux. This also reduces the energy expended on getting at our current sources of energy, so less heat is produced by us. We win on all fronts.

    Personally, I'd like to have the huge space-bound solar collector with microwave transmitter, but in a place where it doesn't reduce the sunlight on earth. If we clean up our act with emissions we should have plenty of breathing room and not have to block out the sun just yet. And sunlight is useful for so many things.

    --

    The enemies of Democracy are
  5. Re:Debate?!? by BigDumbSpaceApe · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Have you a link to a paper in a reputable journal that discusses this finding?
    Is Science acceptable?

    I find the resistance to taking even the slightest measure a little ridiculous. Much like evolution, no one has definitively proved anything. Also like evolution, the basic mechanics are of global warming are understood and the theory has been sitting around 100+ years waiting for someone to poke holes in it (GW was first posulated in 1890). No one has.

    In simpliest terms: There is no doubt adding large amounts of carbon dioxide to the atmosphere will tend to raise temperatures. There is no doubt that we are adding large amounts of carbon dioxide to the atmosphere. There is no doubt that temperatures are rising. Q.E.D.

    --
    WWJD? JWRTFM.