Slashdot Mirror


Sun Steps Back from Linux JDS

chill writes "ZD Net UK is reporting that Sun is pulling back from their JDS desktop Linux initiative. The big question is what happened to those half-million to million-plus units that were supposed to ship in China in 2004? One hint may be that in April, Novell announced a deal with CSSC to 'cooperate to provide technology, services and marketing to optimise and promote Linux to the Chinese market.' Sun's JDS was based on SUSE Linux, now owned by Novell."

31 of 202 comments (clear)

  1. What happened to those units by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    One hour later, they were hungry for Windows again.

  2. This was inevitable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Sun only supports linux because it is forced too. Sun developing for linux is ultimately counterproductive to its own long term future.

    1. Re:This was inevitable by tomhudson · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Sun developing for linux is ultimately counterproductive to its own long term future.
      Not necessarily - and actually probably quite the opposite. The whole idea was to get *away* from being *just a hardware vendor*, and sell all sorts of support services.

      Someone should whack them with a cluestick - everyone knows there are severe penalties for early withdrawal (from a new market).

    2. Re:This was inevitable by AKAImBatman · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Sun developing for linux is ultimately counterproductive to its own long term future.

      That's not entirely true. Sun's strategy has always been to sell hardware and complete solutions. It really doesn't matter to them if they're selling Linux or Solaris. In fact, long before JDS they provided an option to preload RedHat on many of their systems. Why anyone would chose RedHat over Solaris for a server system is beyond me, but a lot of customers were demanding it.

      All the JDS is lacking is a true follow through. This half-assed release-it-and-then-drop-it strategy is guaranteed failure.

    3. Re:This was inevitable by Decaff · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sun only supports linux because it is forced too.

      What is the evidence for this? Linux is a good platform for them to provide software for and sell services for.

      Sun developing for linux is ultimately counterproductive to its own long term future.

      Why? They are moving towards being increasingly a software services company.

    4. Re:This was inevitable by aliquis · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yeah, we'll likely see a lot of comments like "sun changing their mind ones again" and complaints. But why would they use Linux to begin with? I guess in the early days of the JDS they didn't had the Solaris x86 (current version), but once they had it why would they keep on using Linux?
      Even less so when they open-source Solaris and try to gain more momentum.

      Right now I think they are doing everything right. x86 Solaris, Open-Solaris, cheap x86 workstations, soon(?) to be open Java.

      I'll probably install Open-Solaris on my own machine real-soon-now.

      What I like about both Solaris and the BSDs are the great & easy to find documentation, the huge amount of dists in the Linux world plus the fact that they use different user-land tools doesn't help. But if you go with a larger one I suppose the documentation is decent for Linux aswell.

    5. Re:This was inevitable by flithm · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Why anyone would chose RedHat over Solaris for a server system is beyond me

      - iptables
      - proper package management (not that red hat provides that, but compared pkgadd anything seems good)
      - real command line utils (GNU), ie:
      - color ls
      - tar with gzip, bzip support (no need for piping)

      Now I don't want to give the impression I think Solaris is crap. Far from it. Obviously you wouldn't want to run Linux on a massive 64 processor server or anything. But for a small system, and for ease of use and maintenance, Linux is a lot nicer to work with.

      It's amazing how much the small conveniences add up. Seriously, try going without color ls for a while. It's ridiculous, but it can be really frustrating.

    6. Re:This was inevitable by ozbird · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Depends on the architecture - Solaris on Sparc makes sense, why anyone would choose Solaris over Linux on an x86/amd64 platform is beyond me. (I support both at work, and aim to replace as many Solaris boxes as possible with Linux.)

      RedHat Enterprise Linux 4 has become the distribution of choice at work. It's not my first choice but RHEL is easy to install - and has the support pricetag (and scapegoat) to keeps management happy.

      If you can't beat 'em, find something plausible to fit their preconceptions...

    7. Re:This was inevitable by AKAImBatman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Depends on the architecture - Solaris on Sparc makes sense, why anyone would choose Solaris over Linux on an x86/amd64 platform is beyond me. (I support both at work, and aim to replace as many Solaris boxes as possible with Linux.)

      Depends. If it's an actual Sun-built box, then it's just as good as a Sparc box. If it's Solaris/x86 on a random Dell or something, then I agree completely.

    8. Re:This was inevitable by Cally · · Score: 3, Informative
      Obviously you wouldn't want to run Linux on a massive 64 processor server

      Actually sir... that's not... entirely... true.

      --
      "None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free." -- Goethe
    9. Re:This was inevitable by AusG4 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Never used Solaris, I guess?

      In order:

      * ipfilter (which does filtering and in/out NAT including packet level load balancing that is just as good as anything F4 is providing).

      * the solaris package system sucks, yes - but compared to RedHat, by your own admission, is not worse. Download pkg-get from Blastwave and it does all the dependency instlalation and downloading for you anyways, providing a terribly "apt" like system. Who actually downloads Solaris packages manually anymore? Idiots.. that's who.

      * Solaris has come with bash standard, a whole folder of GNU tools (/usr/sfw) and via pkg-get, access to anything and everything that Linux provides in the way of GNU command line tools.

      - color ls isn't ls, per se - it's in the environment. I have color ls on my Solaris boxes. It's trivially easy to configure and is unique to Linux that it's set that way standard. Google is your friend.

      - Solaris tar sucks for many reasons, the biggest of which is it's long standing problems with long filenames. Linux distributions use gtar, and Solaris comes with gtar out of the box in /usr/sfw/bin - so what exactly is the problem here? With Solaris, you get a choice between the two - arguably better for the user.

      Point is - if you just set your environment right (this takes 30 seconds to do when you finish installing your system), most of your arguments disappear and if you get pkg-get the rest of your arguments go with it.

      As for ease of use and maintenance, Solaris 10 with pkg-get and Sun's network management tools reign -hugely- supreme over most Linux distributions. I speak purely from the standpoint of some who has to manage dozens of Solaris boxes (and at one point, dozens of Linux boxes) at the same time. The only Linux dist I've used that really holds up from a management point of view is Red Hat Enterprise - which is every bit as good as the stuff Sun is doing these days.

      Yes, you have to pay for both (I think Sun is actually a little cheaper, IIRC), but it costs me way less to pay Sun/Red Hat for their network manageement services than it costs me in time and labor - one day of my time can cost more than a whole year of RHN.

      As for color ls - haven't been around long, have you? Color ls is a moderate convenience.. but who actually needs it? If you can't be just as efficient without it you probably need to take a UNIX course or something.

      --
      bash-3.00$ uname -a
      SunOS panda 5.10 Generic sun4u sparc SUNW,Ultra-2
    10. Re:This was inevitable by AusG4 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yeah, but have you ever used RHN?

      Log into a single web site, see every server in your stable, along with every package installed, every patch that is pending, all your system info about each server, etc.

      It's the -service- that makes RedHat Enterprise the top tier Enterprise Linux, not the software.

      --
      bash-3.00$ uname -a
      SunOS panda 5.10 Generic sun4u sparc SUNW,Ultra-2
  3. Forget China by AKAImBatman · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The big question is what happened to those half-million to million-plus units that were supposed to ship in China in 2004?

    What about those of us here in the US who *paid* for JDS and were promised major upgrades every quarter? We saw the JDS 1.0 -> 2.0 upgrade, then it stopped while Sun worked on JDS/Solaris.

    Sun needs to learn that the only way they're going to make inroads into the desktop market is if they follow through. Rome wasn't built in a day, and neither was the popularity of Java or Solaris. If Sun would take the time to listen to their customers and implement the features they are demanding, then they'd have a very good chance at success. *sigh*

    1. Re:Forget China by DynaSoar · · Score: 3, Interesting

      AKAImBatman (238306) sez: "What about those of us here in the US who *paid* for JDS and were promised major upgrades every quarter?"

      We're disposable. Why should we matter? It's a free OS. We can do anything else we want to.

      As long companies that could make a difference with Linux vs. Microsoft take such a Hokey-Pokey (you put the left foot in, you take the left foot out...) attitude towards the market, there will be no major progress. There will only continue to be piecemeal progress done by users with the occasional company riding on their backs.

      Can't say as I'm surprised about this. I had JDS from the release date, and throught the support has been among the worst I've ever gotten. I don't think they ever seriously expected it to go anywhere.

      Hopefully they'll now let it go for free. It's worth that.

      --
      "I may be synthetic, but I'm not stupid." -- Bishop 341-B
  4. How is Sun making any money these days? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Could someone clue me in?

    1. Re:How is Sun making any money these days? by mu51c10rd · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Government contracts perhaps?

    2. Re:How is Sun making any money these days? by misaochankun · · Score: 3, Informative

      Sun still runs things like oracle rather well. A lot of big companies continue to run Sun to keep their precious oracle databases running in a somewhat reliable manner. While Linux on hefty hardware can run oracle, and oracle in windows is a joke, you'd really need to bump up to Intel 64bit to really get close to how solaris can do it.
      But that's about all I see solaris good for lately. Everything else is run a lot cheaper and faster on linux.

    3. Re:How is Sun making any money these days? by Decaff · · Score: 3, Informative

      You need only check their website.

      http://www.sun.com/aboutsun/investor/earnings_rele ases/pr/2005-q2.html

      Sales of software, operating systems, Sparc and x86 servers, and providing services.

  5. Re:This is only the kernel... by davecb · · Score: 2, Informative
    "JDS will continue to exist as a product, but now chiefly as software based on Sun's Solaris"

    That means the Gnome, Java-for-desktop-apps and Open Office efforts will keep on, and they'll switch kernels on the desktop offering.

    --
    davecb@spamcop.net
  6. Might be inevitable, but is it wise? by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Sun only supports linux because it is forced too. Sun developing for linux is ultimately counterproductive to its own long term future.

    From a business viewpoint, you're probably right, if they want to keep selling what they're selling.

    On the other hand, sometimes you have to transform the firm - just ask Groves about Intel changing from making memory to making CPUs.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  7. Now we know what Microsoft's $2 billion bought. by team99parody · · Score: 2, Funny

    This is what the highly hyped partnership is all about

  8. I don't think Sun's leaving open source desktops. by Rahga · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If there's one thing that's a reported definite in Sun, it is that they've decided on GNOME for their desktop environment on Solaris sometime in the near future.... I think JDS was a nice experiment at rebranding of both Suse and GNOME software, but never really a serious product with R&D devoted to improving software upstream from it. To make matters more complex, Suse joining the Novell fold has made a mess of the Suse and Ximian desktop offerings. Novell up top seems to be aiming for a losely defined linux services platform in the mold of IBM, not a strongly defined Linux desktop and distribution product. No reason they should go for the later either, since that market is decently covered by other products from other companies.

    So, Sun had JDS which is derived from a distrtibution (Suse) that is not nice to GNOME (wtg, germans), and are giving up on it. No biggie, IMHO.

  9. I own SUN stock... by Captain+BooBoo · · Score: 2, Funny

    Why wasn't I told about this? I swear if I lose another grand from this SUN company I am going to sell. O.o

  10. Re:Linux Is Getting Boring by Zemplar · · Score: 4, Interesting

    "Even the BSD's have made it to the desktop (MacOS) with more success than Linux. It's no surprise, look at the licensing differences."

    Perhaps Sun and Microsoft's new partnership with end with a melding of Solairs kernel with some sort of Microsoft added GUI akin to Apple and FreeBSD? As much as I dislike Microsoft, this could be a great product!

  11. Makes perfect sense by cpn2000 · · Score: 4, Interesting
    It is looking like Sun has finally made up their mind and has decided to ditch Linux once and for all to put their energies into Solaris. For the longest time they were doing a half-hearted job of courting Linux, but I'm glad that they have finally made a decision and moved on.

    It makes sense too. They have a world class Unix based OS and it made little sense for them to just abandon it and move to Linux. If they are able to generate some interest in an open source Solaris, that might be a more sensible path forward for them

    --
    All you touch and all you see is all your life will ever be ... Dark side of the moon
  12. Big Surprise by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Sun was never and never will be a supporter of Linux.

    Anybody who thought the Java Desktop was a "real" Linux distro is nuts. Sun is a proprietary UNIX shop and never will be anything more.

    They're doomed. Flee from their products (except Java which is being open-sourced whether they like it or not) like the plague.

    "Open" Solaris will never develop the community Linux has, and Linux will match and exceed Solaris' capabilities within five years.

    Sun is the "new" SCO. In five years, they'll be suing Linus for "copyright and patent violations".

    --
    Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
  13. Re:Would someone please... by slashdot_commentator · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Pulling JDS because its runs on SUSE Linux makes about as much sense as Sun's decision to piddle around with eDirectory (then NDS) and not actually implement it on Solaris (this after Novell *gave* them the source code for the purpose of putting NDS on Solaris).

    Eventually Novell got tired on Sun sitting on its thumbs and took it all back and did it themselves. Another opportunity lost by Sun.

    Actually, these partnerships work the other way. Microsoft rarely goes to the new platform or new hardware; the 3rd party players front up all the porting costs. It makes no sense for Sun to lead the effort to port eDirectory. Its straightforward to cross-compile eDirectory. But its going to take Novell engineers to figure out why eDirectory would glitch out in situation X. Sun should have just donated hardware and a couple of engineers. But agreed, Sun is pretty stupid for arranging the agreement conditions it did in the first place, and not realizing what a goldmine that eDirectory represents.

    I *like* Sun. I use a lot of their hardware and I cut my UNIX sysadmin teeth on SunOS and Solaris. But its getting disheartening watching them stumble from one stupid decision to another.

    Me too. I don't look at their decisions as being stoopid . They really are between a rock and a hard place. But they have to see the future at this point. They are dead if they continue on their present course. Stupid is throwing willy-nilly a half dozen initiatives to the wall, and seeing what sticks. That's not vision. (I'd love to see their internal analysis which tells how much money their making with Java.)

    Which is *another* reason I'm sharpening my Linux skills.

    What, you need a reason?

    --
    There is no America. There is no democracy. There is only IBM and AT&T and DuPont, Dow, General Electric, and Exxon
  14. IMHO Linux is only just getting started by leoc · · Score: 2, Informative
    With Sony claiming that their PlayStation 3 hard drive will come with Linux by default, Linux could very quickly become a significant power in end user "desktops".


    On a related note, IBM has, contrary to your claim of "jumping off", just posted an article detailing the changes they will be contributing to Linux to take full advantage of the astonishing horsepower of the Cell chip.

    --
    STFU about slashdot bias.
  15. This is becoming amusing by tji · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How many times is Sun going to start a Linux initiative, then change their mind? There must have been four or five of these in the last few years.

    They can't decide if Linux is an opportunity or a competitive threat.

    The answer: It doesn't matter. You guys are doing a great job of killing your company all by yourself.

    Who's steering that ship anyway?

  16. just a bait and switch by porky_pig_jr · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Sun has made so much noises how THEIR distribution of Linux is true to the LInux spirit whereas Red Hat isn't - I've never doubt their linux campaign won't last that long. Just another half-backed marketing idea which boils down to bait and switch. Except it smelled fishy for me right from the start, and I guess for many others as well.

  17. Hardly surprising.. by ikekrull · · Score: 2, Informative

    We had a presentation from some Sun guys, and they basically spent the entire session apologising for the fact that JDS didnt offer the latest packages e.g. 'if youre looking for the latest and greatest, JDS won't give it to you'.

    I mean, why even bother doing it if youre going to settle for half-assed - and then tell your customers upfront you want them to pay for half-assed...

    Needless to say nobody present left the meeting feeling very excited about where Sun was going with JDS.

    Personally, I think dumping Linux is an understandable move in the larger scheme of things - ultimately Solaris is the OS that Sun wants to see succeed, but signalling a lack of support in the JDS offering is baffling.

    There is absolutely no reason why JDS shouldnt run on OpenSolaris and offer the same experience as Linux - it seems that Sun, having finally come to the realisation that an old version of GNOME (which is hardly flawless in it's latest iteration) is a tough sell, especially when compared side-by-side with highly polished offerings from Microsoft and Apple.

    So, instead of doing something about the obvious flaws in their product - Or god forbid come up with something better - they publically throw in the towel, with a vague suggestion that they might decide to have another half-assed attempt at it in future.

    I mean, GNOME and the rest of the Linux desktop is going to improve and will compete head-on with the best that the rest have to offer, and the day will come when Sun will have to try and re-enter the market with a revised offering and explain away this flip-flopping, which isn't going to be at all easy.

    Does nobody at Sun get that this is a pathetic, embarrassing show of weakness?

    --
    I gots ta ding a ding dang my dang a long ling long