Slashdot Mirror


Bittorrent Creator A Digital Pirate?

Alex_Ionescu writes "According to an article in Wired, the old webpage of Bram Cohen contained a manifesto stating that his goal for creating software was to 'Commit Digital Piracy'. Cohen argues that the quote is taken out of context and represents a parody. He argues having written it in 1999, 2 years before even coming up with Bittorrent. You can find the archived copy of his site at archive.org. From the article: "Cohen has never publicly encouraged piracy, and he has consistently maintained that he wrote BitTorrent as a legitimate file-distribution tool. That would seem to make him and his budding company, BitTorrent, safe under the Grokster ruling. But legal experts worry the newly discovered manifesto extolling 'digital piracy' could put him on less certain legal ground."

10 of 386 comments (clear)

  1. We are held to different standards? by garcia · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Cohen said he's unhappy that the Supreme Court's decision is forcing him to confront something he wrote more than five years ago.
    "The way they talked about intent is so vague that it can cause people to pay attention to things that they wrote years and years ago, having nothing to do with what they're doing right now," Cohen said.


    If the President of the United States, the Governor of California, and various other politicians can hold political office regardless of what they did in their past (I won't even go into the difference between actually *doing* something illegal and just writing about it), then there should be no reason why this should even be a minor concern for Cohen or BitTorrent.

    My views since 2002 have changed drastically on numerous subjects including ones I speak about in daily conversation, on Slashdot, and elsewhere. My views in 1999 were even more radically and misguided. I was in my early 20s, in college, and intoxicated (in some form) about 99% of the time. I certainly do not want to be held to what I said then and I certainly don't want to be held to what I say right now 5 years from now. Lots of life changing events occur in a short time now (moving to different areas of the country, encountering new people with different viewpoints, access to more and different information from many different angles).

    It disappoints me that this is even an issue at all. If we are going to make a huge deal out this then I really think that we should have taken more time to consider what ass smacking and coke snorting does to our future. Yet, the problem is that people on that level get held to a different standard than the rest of us. Sadly, the levels are exactly the opposite of what they should be.

    1. Re:We are held to different standards? by AKAImBatman · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If the President of the United States, the Governor of California, and various other politicians can hold political office regardless of what they did in their past, then there should be no reason why this should even be a minor concern for Cohen or BitTorrent.

      Arguably, there's nothing preventing Mr. Cohen from continuing his work. And in fact, it's still likely that a court would find in his favor considering the materials that have been published relevant to the case. (Which is to say, any and all promotional materials about BitTorrent.) The key is that Mr. Cohen is now a public figure, and just like Presidents and Senators who get their pasts drug out as a "reward" for being in the public eye, journalists are also dragging out Mr. Cohen's past.

      Just sit tight. This entire thing will blow over and life will be fine and dandy again. Unfortunately, Mr. Cohen will need to stay on his guard about what he says or does, because there are quite a few people who'd like to see him shut down even though a lot of us users DO use BT for legal purposes. :-/

    2. Re:We are held to different standards? by databyss · · Score: 5, Funny

      I admit it! There was a time in my life when I used to shit on myself.

      Also, there was a time when I was illiterate!

      I feel so much better that I got that off my chest. Feel free to prosecute me as you see fit!

      --
      Hmmm witty sig or funny sig? Maybe elitest techy sig!
  2. Watch what you print.... by Willie_the_Wimp · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This really is just more evidence of how careful you have to be about what you post on the Internet. Many of us first started out on the Internet back in college; back when we had the skills to post and code, but lacked the wisdom to self-moderate.

    Current Internet younglings, take note. Be prepared to defend everything you ever put on a web page. I still cringe when I read some of the stuff I posted 10 years ago...

    Willie

    1. Re:Watch what you print.... by savagedome · · Score: 5, Funny

      I will quote Bill Maher.

      No one has their shit together at 22. Now, outside of the basic fairness of placing George Bush in with all the other young men of his era who found a way to avoid Vietnam, I don't really care if our president showed up for all his National Guard jumping jacks in 1973. I don't care that there's evidence that John Kerry once very nearly met Jane Fonda.

      We've all made mistakes when young and chasing a buzz. Bush blew off his calisthenics. Saddam gassed his own people. I bought the John and Yoko album where they just farted for an hour into a tape recorder!

      The phrase, "youthful indiscretions" is redundant, because how many discreet young people do you know? No, the people you need to worry about are not the one who sowed their wild oats, but the ones who didn't. Michael Jackson had to wait until he was an adult to have a childhood, and I think we see how well that turned out.

      Go back far enough in any great man's life and you will eventually get to the stuff he did or said before he was great or even a man. Don King started out life in Cleveland as a corrupt, murderous thug, but then - okay, bad example.

      But the point remains, trying to define a person's current self by their past self is the worst kind of "gotcha." Our mistakes from the past are just that: mistakes. And they were necessary to make in order to become the wiser person we became.

      You never got drunk and pissed yourself? Or sold drugs to school children? Or panicked when you couldn't get it up at a bachelor party and killed a hooker?

      Hey, if only hindsight could come without having to mess up first. And believe me, I have the platform shoes to prove that one. But to exploit youthful mistakes for political gain is, well, let's just say, when you get older, you might look back and regret it.

  3. Bram is screwed by nokilli · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It isn't just this quote that's the problem, it's the new search engine too.

    Together with the Grokster ruling -- and all happening within such a short interval -- he's just too likely of a target now. Once big media realizes that knocking down the Grokster's does NOTHING to stem the tide of wares being traded via BT, they have to go after Bram.

    It really sucks that a guy who's given us so much is going to be made to suffer so, but it looks to be damn near inevitable.

    Time to donate to the very-soon-to-be-needed legal defense fund.

  4. Hey, look at me, I'm Wired! by mcc · · Score: 5, Funny

    This was written in late 1999, and is a parody of a cypherpunk's manifesto, which struck me as very dishonest manifesto claiming to solely be concerned about privacy.

    Hmm...

    "It is wrong to accept terrorism." -- George W. Bush

    Okay, now watch this.

    "Accept terrorism." -- George W. Bush

    Oh my God, George W. Bush supports terrorism!

  5. Other quotes from his statement... by VeganBob · · Score: 5, Funny

    "I am... in favor of... intruders... to privacy."

    "I... track users... not naive enough to think..."

    "Despite my emphasis on... evil... my goals are... fundamentally... changing existing laws..."

    --
    Being funny is my sig nature.
  6. No freedom without PERSONAL responsibility by Eagle'sFlight · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Bram Cohen produces software. (Without illegal. intent.)
    People use software to perform illegal acts.

    Smith and Wesson produces guns.(Without illegal. intent.)
    People use guns to perform illegal acts.

    GM produces cars. (Without illegal. intent.)
    People use cars to perform illegal acts.


    Why is it the leadership that the people have selected to run our country seems to be forgetting that PEOPLE PERFORM ILLEGAL ACTS.
    Not software
    Not guns
    Not cars
    Not Corporations
    PEOPLE.

    It's time the Judicial system starting hold PEOPLE accountable for what they do not the item they used to do it.

    Welcome to America, everyday closer to a Socialist Republic. :p

  7. Only in America... by derEikopf · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Only in America can you get prosecuted for not knowing the future.