Slashdot Mirror


OSS Web-based File Management?

breadiu asks: "I work for a department at a university, and we'd love to offer students some type of web-accessible file storage, but, like most educational institutions, money is tight. There are some great closed source solutions out there like Xythos' Digital Locker Suite, but those cost. I've had trouble finding a really well put together open source solution. I've taken a look at Slide and even Zope, but neither really match up to Xythos' offerings. What have others done to provide centralized file storage/management? Is there anything OSS that offers WebDAV, Apache support, BSD/Linux support and Active Directory-LDAP authentication with support for Windows and Mac clients?"

29 of 320 comments (clear)

  1. Not so hard by AKAImBatman · · Score: 5, Informative

    1. Never underestimate the power of a plain old FTP server. When I worked for a company with a Citrix machine, it was found that the SMB access to the mainframe would only allow for one connection per IP. (Thanks alot Unisys.) So we setup a go between machine that ran an FTP server mapped to the SMB drive. The Citrix users then used the Netscape FTP support to download and upload files.

    2. Here's precisely how to do what you're looking for on a standard *nix machine: http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/Apache-WebDAV-LDAP-HOWTO /

    First Google result, even. :-)

    1. Re:Not so hard by AKAImBatman · · Score: 3, Informative

      That's the beauty of it though. Users accessed the FTP server through a bookmark in Netscape. As far as they were concerned, they were looking at an ugly web page! Uploads could be done by just dragging the file onto Netscape. :-)

      Internet Explorer is even simpler as it provides a "pretty" Explorer interface to the files.

    2. Re:Not so hard by jdray · · Score: 3, Informative

      We were wrestling with a similar question recently, and came up with WinSCP as a solution for Windows clients accessing "file shares" on Unix boxen. Our end users are very pleased.

      --
      The Spoon
      Updated 6/28/2011
    3. Re:Not so hard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      You can just drag a file into IE and it will upload it for you.

  2. MFile by GPLDAN · · Score: 4, Informative

    The University of Michigan's Web AFS system. Kerberos based authentication, although it can use LDAP as well, using widely available AFS clients as well as a web interface.

    http://mfile.umich.edu/

    1. Re:MFile by aat · · Score: 2, Informative

      But you have at least 1 gig of reliable backed up storage that's web servable. I've been near or over quota for almost 8 years now :-)

  3. Knowledge Tree by pgp4privacy · · Score: 2, Informative
    1. Re:Knowledge Tree by pgp4privacy · · Score: 5, Informative

      Features
      KnowledgeTree(TM) Version 2.0.0

      General Features

      * Fully web-based.
      * Powerful document version control
      * Support for common file formats (MS Word, MS Excel, PDF, TXT, HTML)
      * Subscription agents with push technology for notification of changes to documents or document directories
      * Archiving according to expiry date, expiry time period or utilisation for enhanced speed
      * Publish documents to websites
      * Document-specific discussion forums
      * Full-text search of common file formats (MS Word, MS Excel, PDF, TXT, HTML)
      * Search in user-defined metadata fields
      * Access information according to folder structure, category or document type
      * Personalised dashboard to view subscriptions, pending documents, checked-out documents and quick links
      * Virtual binders for documents based on certain criteria
      * Configurable metadata displayed when document browsing
      * Bulk uploads allow multiple files to be uploaded to a folder.
      * Supports translation of most of the user interface.

      Workflow Features

      * Improved management control of documents with ability to create a set process for document creation and publishing
      * Flexible document approval routing at the folder level
      * Delegate the creation of new documents within a document approval cycle

      Security Features

      * Access rights for document protection on a per group, role or organisational unit basis
      * SSL for encrypted and secure connections
      * Authentication integration with common LDAP servers (OpenLDAP, Sun ONE Directory Server and Active Directory)
      * Audit trails of user interaction with system including document changes

    2. Re:Knowledge Tree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      You forgot to add a link to the KnowledgeTree's website, but here you go. KT is FLOSS and looks quite good after a quick read.

  4. Openfiler is what you want. by iago · · Score: 5, Informative

    WebDAV, smb, cifs, and all sorts of other nifty goodies (built in LVM) www.openfiler.org Its GPL'd and runs pretty well.

    --
    Worst Sig Ever
  5. WebRFM or the HORDE by Chalex · · Score: 2, Informative

    Our school uses WebRFM as basically a web-based file management client. It's ugly, but it works. http://mail.rochester.edu/

    The HORDE Gollem is a promising project also. http://www.horde.org/gollem/

  6. Zope/Plone by t482 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Zope/Plone offers "WebDAV, Apache support, BSD/Linux support and Active Directory-LDAP authentication with support for Windows and Mac clients"

  7. OWL Intranet by CHR1S · · Score: 3, Informative

    I use OWL intranet for our repository. I don't believe it supports LDAP yet though. Still, worth a look. http://owl.sourceforge.net

  8. Multiple protocols by dafz1 · · Score: 2, Informative

    If this is going to run on a Linux box:

    1. Install samba(for Windows), netatalk(for Mac), and ssh servers.

    2. On Windows machines, have them use standard Windows file sharing(\\server.schoolname.edu\shareddir). If your institution has locked down the smb port(445), have them download and run OpenSSH, which includes a graphical directory browsing window.

    3. On Macs, use the standard AFP protocol.

    4. On Linux, using scp would probably be best. You could set up an nfs server, and allow access to the world. I don't recommend this, and you should use some type of authentication.

    Otherwise, and I recommend, get a Mac running OS X. It has easy to configure, and use, smb, ssh, and AFP servers. It's a lot more stable than running the servers on a Linux box. If you have the money, I would recommend springing for an Unlimited Client copy of OS X Server. But a standard OS X box would be fine.

  9. Re:SharePoint by wasabii · · Score: 2, Informative

    It looks a bit weird, but the core funcationlity remains. It is a plain webDAV server at it's heart, and you can access it with open source tools. Some of the special integration that Office offeres doesn't work though.

  10. SCP by Richard_J_N · · Score: 3, Informative

    Most cases, you just want something really simple, easy to implement, and understand. So, why not use SCP. It's secure, easy to set up (all you need on the server is Linux + SSH), and easy to access.

    In konqueror, type scp:// or fish://.
    In Windows, use the free WinSCP program
    In MacOsX - you have ssh/scp.

    Other advantage: if you give them a linux box to access, then it's easy to control private vs group vs public.

  11. try Apache + Subversion by borzwazie · · Score: 3, Informative

    Using Subversion (subversion.tigris.org) and Apache as a front-end (WebDAV link to Subversion, connection to LDAP) you get versioned documentation, file storage, hook-ins to Active Directory or any other LDAP product, and Windows Web Folders for easy access.

    Works very well here for documentation storage. 300+ users.

    --

    "We apologize for the inconvenience."

  12. Re:How about Subversion? by jungd · · Score: 2, Informative

    Here Here. While older versions of subversion didn't support full WebDAV (just a subset needed by the svn client), the lastest versions do.
    Subversion will also give you the option of using regular files or a SQL DB for storage and you'll have versioning for 'free'.

    --
    /..sig file not found - permission denied.
  13. Depends upon the projected load... by Leomania · · Score: 2, Informative

    If the server is going to be busy, OS X probably wouldn't be a good choice. AnandTech had a review of OS X as a server OS and found it couldn't keep up with Linux as the number of connections increased beyond a certain threshold.

    Just something to consider; it will undoubtedly improve in the future, but for now a FOSS solution would likely suffice and not have this limitation.

    --
    You don't use science to show that you're right, you use science to become right.
  14. Re:priorities by aoteoroa · · Score: 5, Informative

    A barbaric attack has just occurred in London and you guys are blabbing on about OSS Web-based File Management? GET SOME PRIORITIES!

    This is a forum for discussing technical issues. If you want to talk about current issues, or popular news items go to
    K5 or
    Fark

  15. Novell iFolder is GPL by Spider-X · · Score: 2, Informative

    Novell iFolder is the best, most secure I've ever seen. And, it's GPL. Here's the URL:

    http://www.ifolder.com/

    --
    witty sig goes here
  16. SSL Explorer by Shadow_139 · · Score: 2, Informative

    SSL Explorer is exactly what you are looking for and they have just released a new updated verion 0.1.12 with include RADIUS. Hosted on SourceForge.net

    It has WebDAV, VNC, Citrix, Rdesktop (Linux), Windows RDP Client, Web Forwarding, SSL Tunnelling and alot more.

    You can set the password with RADIUS, Active Directory or a in-buit DB. All been encrypted under SSL with the ability for multiple SSL Cert's

    I have been using to for a while now in the big company and it works a dream, plus getting better with each update.

    All Web base with optional VPN (Java) Client, with some screen keyboard for security from keyloggers and usability e.g. Palm/PocketPC/SmartPhone, Public Kiosk, etc. All you need is a Web Browser and away you go......

  17. yet another dupe by spoonyfork · · Score: 4, Informative
    Don't forget to check the previous Ask Slashdot discussion on this very topic titled Open Source Web-Based File Management? from 2/17/05.

    That said, I would suggest doing some searches on various other sites whose opinion you value. Chances are it has been asked there before as well.

    --
    Speak truth to power.
  18. Re:FTP != WebDAV by huckleup · · Score: 3, Informative

    Maybe 'uploading and downloading" is a bit vague, and maybe you were just trying do some semantics policing, but for those don't understand it all, WebDAV works very differently than FTP as far as opening, editing and saving files. It's like saying what is the difference between FTP and SMB/AFP/NFS.

    You can kinda edit files on an FTP server through some hackery, but it has a slew of problems. Essentially the entire file is downloaded to a temp file, then the temp file is edited, then the entire thing is uploaded on save.

    WebDAV is a networked filesystem like SMB/AFP/NFS. The editing app doesn't have to have any special support, as the file is opened/edited/saved just as if it is a local file using standard file open/read/seek/write APIs. Only the range of data that the app needs to view/edit have to be down/uploaded as the app does reads/writes (just like any networked file system.) The remote WebDAV server also supports true file locking so that someone else can't open/edit the file while it is in use (as well as other meta data like MIME type etc.) .

    With FTP someone could download a file, start editing, and meanwhile someone else could download/edit/upload, then the first user uploads changes and overwrites the first edits.

    So yeah, in both FTP and remote filesystems data is 'uploaded and downloaded'. But the difference in protocols makes a big difference in how it all works to the end user.

  19. Anytime/Anywhere drive by mcrbids · · Score: 4, Informative

    Here's the problem I had, and how I solved it:

    1) We're a small software company, and we're *VERY* mobile. I joke that my office is my laptop, but it's not much of a joke. we can (and do) work almost anywhere we have power + 'net connection.

    2) We need to have a common file store primarily for backups, but also so that we can share files and documents easily.

    3) WebDAV is close. Windows support for WebDAV falls short of actually mounting the drive. (EG: with a drive letter) This creates lots of little headaches copying files, some programs won't open files directly from a DAV folder, etc...

    4) I found a utility put out by Novell, a free download, called "NetDrive" that lets you mount a WebDAV share as a drive on the local system. Google for NetDrive

    5) This, combined with Apache/WebDAV/Mod_SSL makes an easy, reliable, secure, mountable drive that mounts anywhere an HTTPS connection is allowed. (which almost *ALL* firewalls allow)

    I'm not using LDAP authentication. There are only 5 of us, and we don't hire/fire all that often.

    --
    I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
    1. Re:Anytime/Anywhere drive by Dare+nMc · · Score: 2, Informative

      nice.
      I havent used it, but appears you can do the same using gmail instead, GMAILFS http://www.viksoe.dk/code/gmail.htm

      or the open source version:

      http://pgd.sourceforge.net/

  20. .LRN by tdxdave · · Score: 2, Informative

    .LRN is a web based community system for universities that has group based file sharing with a web user interface and WebDAV support. It also supports LDAP authentication. If that's too much, the OpenACS platform .LRN is built on has all the features your are looking for in file sharing, access control and authentication.

  21. Re:Web based file management by herberts · · Score: 2, Informative

    Here it is. http://www.iroise.net/WebShare.tar.gz

    I just translated it from French to English.

    This is provided as is with no support, source should be enough.

    It is based on Apache 2 (2.0.53), mod_perl. It uses several perl modules (check source) and memcached.

  22. BioCoRE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    This might be quite-the-overkill, but I have to at least suggest it: biocore.ks.uiuc.edu.

    This is actually an entire collaborative environment, allowing for group segregation, file sharing, etc., and is great for classroom use. If you take the simple tour (http://www.ks.uiuc.edu/Research/biocore/tour/) you can see what I'm talking about.