Slashdot Mirror


Form Filling Through Office 12

Qa32 writes "For those chomping at the bit for more Office 12 details, Microsoft offered a tiny peek at the upcoming offering, or offerings, due next year. In what he termed the first public viewing of Office 12, Chris Caposella, corporate vice president of Microsoft's Information Worker Product Management Group, showed off a distributed forms capability that would enable customers to fill in and submit XML forms easily via a browser, without having to run Microsoft InfoPath on their PC."

17 of 186 comments (clear)

  1. So... by eggz128 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Like you can do with PDFs today (and for the past couple of years)?

    1. Re:So... by Alphabet+Pal · · Score: 3, Funny

      I don't know of this "PDF", so I figured I'd ask the Microsoft assistant to tell me more. Clippy doesn't consider this a valid option - I asked him "How do I fill out forms in PDF?" and he answered "Create forms that users complete in Word". If even Clippy's never heard of it, I'm not going to risk it.

      --
      Because you can't spell "slaughter" without "laughter"
  2. WTF is InfoPath? by ari_j · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Besides the blurb being simply a quote from the beginning of the article, it doesn't provide any of the background information that we need. There are many of us who are curious enough about the story to justify it being on the front page of Slashdot but who don't know enough about the buzzwords and products named in the blurb to figure out how it affects us.

    1. Re:WTF is InfoPath? by MHobbit · · Score: 4, Informative

      InfoPath is one of the programs in one of the Microsoft Office 2003 packages. It allows XML form creation and editing; you can create forms that people could fill out online.

      --
      Debugging? Klingons do not debug. Bugs are good for building character in the user.
    2. Re:WTF is InfoPath? by VP · · Score: 5, Funny

      InfoPath is to Information what PsychoPath is to the Psyche...

  3. Uh huh. by AKAImBatman · · Score: 4, Interesting

    A multi-billion dollar company places its best people on creating better office software and we get...

    A reinvention of HTML Forms?

    This is the 21st century! Where are my flying cars? I want flying cars, not "XML Form Things".

    1. Re:Uh huh. by Frostalicious · · Score: 4, Informative

      InfoPath is a product which allows you to create XML documents which you can email to each other. These documents act like HTML forms when opened in the InfoPath environment. Users can then fill out the form and the data gets posted somewhere like to a webservice.

      My opinion is that it is basically like a form on a web page, except less functional, and harder to develop. MS has taken the easiest part of web development (making forms out of INPUT tags) and made it much harder by wrapping a WYSIWYG editor around it. This is yet another attempt to allow the unwashed masses to design their own web forms for data manipulation. I think it is a massive failure so far since it only addresses the most trivial part of web development. And I'm no MS hater.

  4. Call me a cynic, but.. by CdBee · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ..would this ability (XML forms thru browser)be limited to Internet Explorer running on Longhorn?

    --
    I have been a user for about 10 years. This ends Feb 2014. The site's been ruined. I'm off. Dice, FU
  5. Implements XForms Standard or Embrace and Extends? by Doug+Dante · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Does this mean the MS Office 12 implements the XForms standard, or that it embraces and extends it in a proprietary way? If so, what's the advantage for users of MS Office 12 over XForms?

    --
    The world will not get better through technology. We must seek to be better people.
  6. I, for one, welcome... by banglogic · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ... this capability. Yes, PDF forms have allowed this for quite some time. But, like it or lump it, MS is the leader when it comes to productivity apps. This ability expands the Office line further into the general web and closer to the world of open standards. Seems to me like one of the few useful features they have introduced in a long time. Besides, it's not like they have a choice. OpenOffice 2.0 (beta 1.9) is looking sweet and is finally starting to represent an actual threat to the Evil Empire.

    --
    Bang Logic - Serious Small Business Services
  7. Re:Why all the bashing? by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Microsoft is using an open and robust format (XML) for their office documents - what's wrong with that?

    Nothing is wrong with that. It's just that none of us actually believe that they will implement an open XML format. Anyone who has been watching MS for the last 10 years knows that the format will be XML with some big chunks of binary data, probably encrypted, and with patents and the DMCA preventing compatibility. I hope they prove me wrong, but at this point I trust them about as far as I can throw their headquarters (which I think is shaped like a giant cobra for some reason). If they want to implement an open XML format the EU and a number of projects have endorsed and implemented the OASIS standard document format. How about adding support for import and export to that format?

  8. Re:Implements XForms Standard or Embrace and Exten by Ravatar · · Score: 3, Informative

    InfoPath works independently from XForms, although the aim is similar, to convert user input to XML. Companies that have deployed Office 2003+ would most likely use InfoPath. Companies that haven't would most likely implement XForms.

  9. Puh-leeeze... by DreadfulGrape · · Score: 3, Insightful
    98 percent of Office users won't use any of this new crap. 75 percent won't even upgrade.

    MS Office -- stick a fork in it -- it's done.

    --
    sig has been sent away for a few small repairs...
  10. Wake me up... by thomas.me · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...when Microsoft stops talking about what they are going to reinvent next year, and releases something new .

    Yawn. Never saw a more boring company.

  11. marketing BS; "Office 2006, make YOU work faster!" by SuperBanana · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I can see why some people might like having their icons change around, but I hate it. I want to click where the thing always is and have the thing work.

    They do it, quite simply, because Office does pretty much what it always has. Sure, maybe Excel gets a new graph format or a new function, and maybe Word tells you how many paragraphs per fortnight you write.

    None of these are sexy marketing bullets. "New in Office 2006! Sin() 125% faster! Slightly different 3D chart you'll never use! Spell check finally has 80% instead of 75% of English words!" doesn't cut it on the banners and magazine ads.

    "Office 2006- streamlined for the way YOU and YOUR business works. So you can get to the important things in life quicker" (insert picture of model playing with model child, both of them laughing. Flowers and ice cream and little puppies optional).

    Sound familiar? That's because that is the basis for virtually every "new" Office release marketing blitz in the last decade. Why? Because for much of the business world, if you're sitting there at your desk instead of home with your SO and/or kids, chances are you're staring at a Word, Excel, or Powerpoint document. Translation: you identify with the supposed problem and believe the utter lie- that the new software will boost your productivity.

    Also, changing around the interface keeps the training companies busy, and pushes companies to upgrade everyone so "people don't get confused" (same with the myriad of niggling little incompatibilities, especially in Powerpoint, which affect how slides are rendered.)

  12. Trading ease of use with security... the MS way by zanderredux · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Well, I'm not impressed about this new functionality. At all.

    Actually, it might become yet another monstruous security hole, given MS's <sarcarsm> amazing security record </sarcarsm>.

    The problem I have with MS is that they're so eager to give power to users -- in a haphazardly way -- that it completely overlooks security. Or corporate IT policy compliance, depending of where you work at.

    For an evidence of this behavior, take a look at this comment on MS hiring practices and the respective reply. Basically, they're loaded with marketeers, who grasp some of IT, enough to sell stuff and are, somehow, empowered to make technical decisions at the expense of standards.

    At this point, I have to praise Apple. IMHO they make good calls on the question of how to give power to users without seriously compromising security. Heck, I really believe that if Apple became a cell phone operator they could make cell phones and network more secure and more powerful.

  13. A browser that can submit forms? FINALLY! by Mr2001 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Thank God someone finally implemented this great idea. I'm so sick of having to telnet into servers and type in POST queries by hand to submit forms. Now, at long last, we'll be able to post comments on Slashdot just by typing text in a box and clicking a button!

    --
    Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.