Slashdot Mirror


A Simple, Family-Oriented CMS?

jbarr asks: "I would like to host a private, family-oriented Content Management System (CMS) that would allow geographically-separated family members to easily share online things like photos, comments, stories, calendars, etc. I would like it to have friendly yet secure front-end and have an easy interface that wouldn't intimidate the less-than computer-savvy. I could always just install and tweak PHP-Nuke and create a family-friendly theme, but is there something else that you would suggest? I would prefer an Open Source solution, as my host is Linux-based."

12 of 66 comments (clear)

  1. Isn't that what yahoo groups is for? by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 2, Informative

    Not my kind of thing, but that sounds like exactly the feature set of yahoo groups.

    --

    There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
  2. Yahoo Groups works for several families I know by stefanlasiewski · · Score: 4, Informative

    As the owner of GmailTips.com, I'm sure you will appreciate the irony of my post :)

    I've known a couple family groups who ended up using Yahoo Groups for this very purpose. It was the cheapest and simplest solution. Do you really want to host a web/email service and provide technical support to your family? (Not that there's anything wrong with that) :)

    I've run two dozen different lists through them for a variety of groups (Work alumni groups, self-help groups for job seekers, geographically dispersed groups, etc). Each time we debated what services to use, Yahoo Groups won out because it had the most complete feature set and was the easiest to use. Nobody really cared about having a full-fledged CMS--they just wanted to be able to post stories, comments via email or the web.

    Yahoo Groups is good enough, with a few caveats.

    Yahoo groups supports comments & stories as regular old posts, photos & calendars. The group members can receive the posts via email or on the web, which makes it simple if they just want to use their regular email.

    It doesn't have a good secure interface, the default login screen is HTTP, but you can log in via HTTPS as well. The groups can be invisible to outsiders, closed to non-subscribers, etc. Not sure if that's what you meant by a 'secure interface'.

    The solution is not open-source, it's not something you can custom host, they have ads, and you need a Yahoo account to use the advanced features (I think).

    --
    "Can of worms? The can is open... the worms are everywhere."
  3. e107 by schnits0r · · Score: 4, Informative

    I like E107. It's very useful and customizable and has a great theme and plugin developer community.

    for me it suits everything from community sites, to corporate sites.

  4. I've said it before, and I'll say it again by captnitro · · Score: 3, Informative

    Geeklog. Pathetically easy to set up and use, even moreso to administer. Plugins aplenty from squatty.com. And of course you need themes.

    PHPNuke is OK, but I've found Geeklog to be a lot cleaner, and the community support is insane[ly good]. For your purposes, comments, stories, and calendars (including per-user calendaring, I believe) is included. There are several plugins that connect Geeklog and Coppermine, Gallery, etc.

  5. Re:One Word: by jgaynor · · Score: 2, Informative

    Ummm no. I recently moved away from the nuke set (phpnuke too closed-developmkent, postnuke to full of security holes). I chose mambo because of it's popularity and ease of setup. It's been a nightmare since then. Mambo is unorganized as HELL. The documentation is horrible and the administration panel is a GUI junkyard.

    Want to make your own theme? Good luck. There's like 9 user-definable php insertion points and if you remove one of them your modules go with it. It's not intelligent enough to move to the next defined placeholder (both nukes are).

    It's very powerful after a few months of acclamating yourself, but the learning curve is far too great. Postnuke on the other hand was a single-day affair for me.

    Just my 2 cents. Oh and dont follow the link in my sig, it's the wasteland that was a failed attempt at customizing mambo :).

  6. Got to recommend Drupal by mogrify · · Score: 3, Informative
    Drupal is a pretty slick CMS that I've been using for a while. It's the only one I've used whose code I haven't immediately wanted to heavily modify.

    Here's what you might like about it:
    • It's modular, so the base install is pretty lightweight, but you can add a lot of features. Activating a module is usually as simple as untar'ing it into a directory and switching it on, and maybe running a SQL script.
    • Granular user controls. Permissions and interface can be configured at a pretty fine level, so they only see what they need to see. It's easy to have multiple authors on the same site. Also easy to limit content for anonymous users.
    • Supports all the stuff you mentioned, either natively, or through native-looking modules. (i.e. you don't need to integrate Gallery).
    • Great admin interface. Lots of options are exposed, more than I've ever seen.
    • Active and large community... 'nuff said.
    A lot of CMSs offer these, but I've been happiest with Drupal's feel and overall ease of use.
    --
    perl -e 'foreach(values %SIG){$_="IGNORE";}while(){}'
  7. LiveJournal by prostoalex · · Score: 3, Informative

    LiveJournal

    Was created by Brad to help his family keep in touch, and at the same time be as user-friendly as possible. Has a bunch of GUI apps that allow posting without ever touching the Web interface.

    "Friends" aggregators allows the users to read the stream of postings of the friends they choose to add, so no need to browse 15 journals at once to see whether they added anything new over the past few days.

    E-mail notifications, commenting, pictures, etc.

    And it's open source.

  8. Pick one out yourself. by SocialEngineer · · Score: 4, Informative

    hit OpenSourceCMS and go through the lists - most have online demos available so you can play with them. :)

    --
    "Better to be vulgar than non-existent" -Bev Henson
  9. Try MediaWiki or Drupal... by kosmosik · · Score: 3, Informative

    Try Drupal [http://drupal.org/%5D it is simple but powerfull CMS/Blog system. With easy user interface (at least I think so) and writen very well (meaning code) - it is clean, object oriented mostly, and modular. The tarball is just half megabyte.

    Or maybe go with MediaWiki [http://wikipedia.sourceforge.net/%5D it is the engine behind WikiPedia - it uses simple wiki markup, supports images, stories and stuff. Also it has access control, revision control etc. - it should be suitable for such tasks.

    And to be honest dont go with anythink with *nuke in name - this is spaghetti code shit. It is very awful for me. Unclean, not modular.

  10. Re:Exponent by Professional+Slacker · · Score: 2, Informative

    My first mod parent up post, I feel so ashamed.

    I've got to give it to Exponent, it's a great system to work with. I'm working on moving an intranet portal away from a propriety system to Exponent. The only feature loss, moving to Exponent, was pop-up menus for site navigation, but being OSS a quick bit of hackery and I got the PHP Layers Menu integrated. Good features, easy to install, easy to admin, easy to modify, and easy to use.

    And to karma whore Open Source CMS.org has links and demos of just about every CMS.

    --
    A Free Market requires informed intelligent consumers, such people are rare, we're in trouble.
  11. Mambo! by nege · · Score: 3, Informative

    You may want to take a look at Mambo CMS (www.mamboforge.net) It is GNU licensed, and in my experience, a very mature CMS app. There are tons of plugins (including a cool Dreamweaver extension that makes theme-ing pretty easy). I use the blog and gallery plugins for my site and I am very happy with it.

    I have also used e107 as well, it is a pretty nice app as well, but Mambo seems to have more features.

  12. Lousy site by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    OpenSourceCMS is not about open source, or CMS for that matter. It is only about PHP. There are PHP non-CMS products, and there are non-open-source PHP apps.

    If all you want is PHP, and don't really know if you want a CMS, then the site is fine. But if you really want a comprehensive comparison, look elsewhere. Maybe a site like http://cmsmatrix.org/.

    Otherwise you might miss out on top-notch CMS products like Plone and Bricolage.