Slashdot Mirror
The End of a Floppy Era
An anonymous reader writes This article is an editorial on the end of the floppy and the rise of more portable, more efficient data storage." Floppy nothing. In my day we etched our data into pottery. Talk about your long term enterprise data storage. Some of those buggers made it thousands of years!
This article was entered as part of an article-writing contest with real life rewards such as a video card or DVD writers. This article is just written by some guy trying to win a contest, not by anyone influential. What he says is true, but obvious.
Cyde Weys Musings - Scrutinizing the inscrutable
I've got a floppy drive on this machine, and the only reason for that is Windows requires SATA drivers to be given to it on a floppy disk during install. If MS let me use a CD or even a USB pen drive for that it wouldn't be necessary (it even asked for a floppy in the A: drive when no floppy drive was connected).
Linux Wireless Hardware in the UK
OK then I've just found this which sounds like it should solve the problem of requiring a floppy drive. Hope someone else finds it useful too.
Linux Wireless Hardware in the UK
The article claims that a 3.5inch floppy holds only 1.44 megabytes of data. That's true only if you format them in the standard MS-DOS format (and we'll ignore the rather weird definition of 'megabyte' used to quote the size). But the physical limit of the diskette is two megabytes - that's why they are sometimes called '2MB (Unformatted)' - and with better software you can get closer to this.
You can increase the number of tracks (concentric circles) on the disk, or the number of sectors per track (reducing the gap between each sector). Floppy drives are rated for 80 tracks but can usually manage a few more. There is the 1.72 megabyte or so format used by Microsoft for installation floppies, which is readable by standard DOS and Windows with no problems. Although DOS supports it, the 'format' program doesn't, so you will need to get fdformat or 2MDOS (see below).
A step further is to install a driver like 2M (search for it on Simtel's MS-DOS archive) which lets you format floppies up to 1.92 megs or so. I think some of these formats are understood by Linux but I'm not sure. Sadly, since 2M is a DOS driver it won't work with newer Windows versions. The included 2MDOS driver patches MS-DOS's format program to let you format floppies in 1.72 megs and other reasonably-large sizes, which are then readable by all DOS and Windows versions without the need for extra drivers.
2M also includes 2MGUI, short for '2M-Guiness', which claims to hold the world record for fitting the most onto a floppy. It will format ordinary quad-density floppies nearly two megabytes. (Bizarrely, it also manages to get about 1.1 megs on a double-density floppy, which is more than the theoretical limit.)
Note also that later model IBM PS/2s included an octuple-density floppy drive, giving 2.88 megs with vanilla DOS or OS/2 and nearly 4 megs with clever format programs, but this more expensive hardware never caught on. Perhaps the floppy controller in your clone PC nowadays can handle an octuple-density disk drive, I'm not sure.
-- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
You can use BartPE on a USB thumbdrive as long as your BIOS supports booting from it.
In other, related news, my BIOS sucks.
Actually CDs can boot in two ways, the way you describe is a floppy emulation mode, this is used by linux boot disks. However they can boot in a full disk mode, this is used by all windows install disks. Interestingly some IDE host devices like the Promise Ultra 133TX2 don't support the emulation mode. For more info look at http://www.promise.com/support/faq/faq2_eng.asp?pr oduct_id=87# and select the 3 option on the faq.
James
Obviously someone who is quite unaware of how much a BIOS actually does, and how much DOS relies on it. Every single operation a DOS machine can to do the hardware is done through the BIOS. That includes - guess what - flashing it!
Only in these days of everyone needing their own drivers for every bit of hardware have people forgotten the utility of the BIOS.
DOS may be in memory, but the BIOS calls execute from CMOS. That includes those calls which make USB drives appear as floppies to brain-dead old DOS. And DOS from a floppy is still the safest way to flash a BIOS.
Not if you own an ASUS motherboard. All 3 of my Asus Motherboards can be flashed in windows with there handy "ASUS Update" Utility. It goes on the internet and finds the newest bios for your motherboard and from a click of a button backs it up and installs the new one. I don't know how "smart" it is to do from windows but worked fine for me on my Asus PII 350MHz and my Athlon 64 system.
The days of floppys are slowly deminishing. Heck I can boot my system off a USB Thumbdrive or a flashcard (connected through my printers flash card reader) if I wanted too. The only systems with floppy drive is my Pentium Pro and the floppy doesn't even work. I was looking at my pictures and noticed I still have the floppy cleaning thingy in it from like 2000.
Oh and out of my 50 some disks I bet you about 10 actually work.
Solosoft.org - Your Online Resource to Nothing
I still outfit every computer i build with a floppy. Only 10 bucks, and you never know when it'll come in handy.
True; although ironically, the present cheapness of floppy drives and disks have probably contributed to lack of quality, and driven the perception of the floppy further into the ground than would have happened otherwise.
This is beside the point; the floppy's time has been and gone. Which raises a couple of issues with the article:-
(1) The guy is positively relishing the end of floppy disks. Yeah, they're slow, and really too small to be useful for anything except emergency boot disks nowadays. But I remember getting an Atari 800XL with 5.25" drive in the mid-80s (not state-of-the-art, even then) and believe me, when the alternative was program storage on audio cassette (as was the norm for the UK 8-bit market), a floppy drive was pretty damn desirable. Particularly when you consider that Atari games took from 5-25 minutes to load from cassette. *I* didn't hate floppies back then.
(2) It's notable that he doesn't mention the "next-generation" disk drives such as the Iomega Zip and LS-120/Superdisk... the 3.5" floppy comes out bad because it's been around *forever* (original release circa 1982, with the 1.44Mb HD released roughly *twenty years ago*!!). It's not as if the 3.5" was the only potential successor to the 5.25", it just happened to be the one adopted as standard. There were many potential successors to the 3.5", but they didn't become widely adopted enough (not even the relatively popular Zip) to become "transparently" standard.
So, the question is, is he criticising floppies, or just having a go at the 3.5" format? In fact, what was the point of the article at all- that the 1.44Mb floppy is dying? That's not news, we've heard it before, and it's too widespread to die suddenly, although USB drives will hasten its demise.
It's like audio cassettes... I didn't just "stop" using them one day. It just dawned on me that I had no real need for them any more, that I wasn't likely to record any new ones, and that it made more sense to transfer any remaining "commitment" to other formats. They're not woefully obsolete, I don't hate them, I just don't have a real use for them any more.
"Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
A while back I wanted to check the integrity of a hard drive and realized that the hard drive utilities were on floppy. I have long since abandoned the floppy drive in my long upgraded machine. So I searched around for a bootable cd image that had such utils and found this. If you ever need one of those floppy utils, most likely they will be found on the Ultimate boot CD.
Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
<offtopic>Actually, that's now called an EIA232 port, since it's no longer just a recommended standard. Changed in 1991, but since it had been "RS-232" for about 30 years at that point, nobody paid much attention.</offtopic>
"Murphy was an optimist" - O'Toole's commentary on Murphy's Law