Slashdot Mirror


'MP3' Celebrates its Tenth Anniversary

Sachin Garg writes "The Data Compression News Blog reports that on July 14th 2005, the name "MP3" celebrates its tenth anniversary. On this day back in 1995, the researchers at Fraunhofer Institute for Integrated Circuits IIS decided to use ".mp3" as the file name extension for their new audio coding technology. Development on this technology started in 1987, in 1992 it was considered far ahead of its times, then MP3 became the generally accepted acronym for the ISO standard IS 11172-3 "MPEG Audio Layer 3" and no other coding method so far (2005) could uncrown MP3 as the popular standard for digital music on the computer and on the Internet."

49 of 306 comments (clear)

  1. Patent Issues? by gbulmash · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Recently, a friend got a spam about MP3's patent issues and a software package backed by some lawyer and programmer to convert your MP3s into a non-patented format. Stupid, because Microsoft has claimed WMA is free (and just about every portable player and PC jukebox supports it), and if you don't trust Microsoft, you can always go with OGG. Why buy anything from these spammers?

    They make some vague claims, such as "we believe [the patent owners] are serving papers right now." Note the fact that they have no concrete examples of this happening. They just believe it is. Then: "it's believed that one Website Owner has recently settled out of court for several millions." Once again, no concrete example. Just a belief that this has happened.

    But great scams always include a grain of truth, this one being that MP3's patent is owned by Thomson, and they have set licensing terms.

    So my question is, does anyone KNOW of Thomson actually suing anyone or gearing up for a rash of suits as the spammers claim? And this is not "I believe they are" or "a friend knows a guy whose sister's boyfriend's cousin's hairdresser's uncle got sued by Thomson while removing a gerbil from Richard Gere's butt." Does anyone have any concrete info on Thomson enforcing their patents?

    - Greg

    1. Re:Patent Issues? by AKAImBatman · · Score: 5, Informative

      I don't know about lawsuits, but this article touches upon the cease and desist letters they sent out. Such a move *could* have killed MP3s, except that Thomson's licensing is very reasonable.

      For one, you don't need a license for "private, non-commercial activities (e.g., home-entertainment, receiving broadcasts and creating a personal music library), not generating revenue or other consideration of any kind or for entities with an annual gross revenue less than US$ 100 000.00."

      Beyond that, their royalty rates are as little as $0.75 per copy, or a one time fee of $50-60K.

    2. Re:Patent Issues? by donutz · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Microsoft has claimed WMA is free (and just about every portable player and PC jukebox supports it)

      Well except that every iPod does not support it...and that's a significant number of portable players...

    3. Re:Patent Issues? by gbulmash · · Score: 2, Informative
      Well except that every iPod does not support it...and that's a significant number of portable players...

      Ummm, iTunes imports and convert it to AAC for your iPod.

      - Greg

    4. Re:Patent Issues? by Peter+Cooper · · Score: 2, Informative

      I just tried it and.. nope.

    5. Re:Patent Issues? by HeroreV · · Score: 2

      And that whole 'loss of quality' thing is so exagerated anyway.

  2. .bit by fembots · · Score: 3, Interesting

    this is the overwhelming result of our poll: everyone voted for .mp3 as extension for ISO MPEG Audio Layer 3! As a consequence, everyone please mind that for WWW pages, shareware, demos, and so on, the .bit extension is not to be used anymore. There is a reason for that, believe me :-)

    I wonder what is the reason for not using .bit? Does it sound too short?

  3. MP2's by Ossifer · · Score: 3

    I still have a handfull of .mp2 files actually provided for free from the record companies...

    1. Re:MP2's by isorox · · Score: 2, Interesting

      So do I, but that's because we still use them all the time in a broadcast medium

  4. Somewhere... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... a record executive weeps.

  5. Raise your hand... by AKAImBatman · · Score: 3, Informative

    ...if you remember using WinPlay3 back in the day!

    If you don't, well, maybe you were too young back then. ;-)

    1. Re:Raise your hand... by tlhIngan · · Score: 2, Interesting

      And who remembers typing in all the arcane command line options to the only encoder that was generally available... l3enc and l3dec? This was if you didn't compile the ISO encoder...

      Also, distributing pirated keys to WinPlay and l3enc/dec because both would only do 30 seconds otherwise?

    2. Re:Raise your hand... by FrostedWheat · · Score: 3, Funny

      Oh fantastic! I'd forgot about that one!

      I remember running it on my overclocked 486, half sample rate and mono to get it to play - and only just. It took up most of the CPU and to play the MP3 without skipping I'd have to pause it at the start and let it buffer up a bit.

      8.3 filenames, no ID3 or streaming. Good days ;-)

    3. Re:Raise your hand... by AKAImBatman · · Score: 3, Interesting

      And who remembers typing in all the arcane command line options to the only encoder that was generally available... l3enc and l3dec?

      Ahhh, l3enc. That program was like magic in a bottle. Put a 50-100MB WAV in one end, and a 3MB MP3 would pop out the other. Considering the piss poor excuse for sound editing and ripping tools we had back then, it was amazing that I ever found anything to encode! (IIRC, I pulled music from CDs to play with the encoding.)

    4. Re:Raise your hand... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      That sounds familiar, and I also remember spanning an mp3 across 2 floppies and wondering who in their right mind would ever do something as nutty as put a CD track on 2 floppies. Little was I to know...

      For the record the track was 'Made of Stone' by the Stone Roses - still a classic!

    5. Re:Raise your hand... by drix · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Hah-I remember that. I actually did research into buying/creating an offboard MP3 decoder card so I could free up the CPU to play Quake. Em were the days...

      --

      I think there is a world market for maybe five personal web logs.
    6. Re:Raise your hand... by jwlidtnet · · Score: 2, Informative

      And let's not forget the magical search for the "superior" version of L3Enc, the stupendous version 2.0, which had two advantages over the more common later versions:

      a) Whereas 128kb/sec (the standard of the day) was a registered-version-only switch in later versions of L3enc, it was in the free and clear in earlier versions.

      b) L3Enc 2.0 is one of the few encoders I've *ever* seen that supports dual-channel encoding, in which both channels of the stereo spectrum are dealt with entirely separately. As joint-stereo would occasionally sound like crap on some more dubiously-sourced MP3s, dual-channel was a must in those cases.

  6. 10th anniversary for mp3? by FerretFrottage · · Score: 4, Funny

    I thought based on its compression ratio this would just be the 1st anniversary for mp3. Granted some things in those 10 years are lost, but we can't remember everything can we?

    --
    "Look Lois, the two symbols of the Republican Party: an elephant, and a fat white guy who is threatened by change."
  7. Re:considered? by turtled · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I remember in 1996 I had a Metallica site (Yes, Metallica) with MP3s. They were small, encoded at 56k / 22khz mono, maybe about 1~1.5MB per song. I had people download hard to find B-sides. At that time is when I found out what bandwidth was. I had them served on my free 20MB web space at enteract.com. I had over 10,000 visitors in 4 months. They shut me down because I had to purchase more bandwidth. I thought it was free web space...

    --
    "I cannot think of any need in childhood as strong as the need for a father's protection." -- Sigmund Freud
  8. Evil Bit set by 1998 by RobertB-DC · · Score: 5, Interesting
    The article is only about the dawn of .mp3, but within less than three years, the RIAA & co. had configured themselves to set the Evil Bit whenever they saw the .mp3 extension. Or at least, that was my experience.

    In 1998, I started a little fan site detailing the history of a country group -- I won't name them, but they became famous and then infamous within the span of 5 years. As part of the site, I included some low-quality .mp3's of the group's orignal sound, from some out-of-print indie albums. But before you could say "infringement", I got a Cease And Desist letter from the group's lawyers. I capitulated, but the affair proved the perfect grist for a story in the local alternative newsweekly -- they saw the group as having sold out to Nashville, with the C&D just further proof.

    But check out what the group's manager said about the nascent format:
    Senior Management's Simon Renshaw, the band's manager, insists the only reason the band went after Brooks was that the sound bites were in MP3 form. "I will just say one thing: His site with MP3 files...is a huge red flag," Renshaw says. "And that's all I really want to say about that, quite honestly."

    And the lawyer, on the broader issue of copyrights:
    "The bottom line to me is very simple," says Beiter, whose firm was hired by Senior Management, the band's Nashville-based management company. "To me, it's just not fair. It's not fair for him to take their copyright and decide that he's unilaterally going to give it away out on the Internet. It's not fair for him to do that. He may try to cast it as David versus Goliath or Robin Hood or whatever, but it's just not fair for him to do that. He never even asked."

    In the end, I got more free publicity for my little fan site than if I'd scattered flyers all over Dallas. I'll avoid whoring for hits in this post, though... I think you can figure out where to click if you're really interested.
    --
    Stressed? Me? Of course not. Stress is what a rubber band feels before it breaks, silly.
    1. Re:Evil Bit set by 1998 by pete6677 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The RIAA has a history of trying to stomp out ALL digital music distribution, legal or otherwise. I recall them filing several lawsuits against the old mp3.com which did not even host illegal RIAA music. Also, they tried to sue the makers of the first portable MP3 player (the Diamond Rio) even though it didn't even have a record function. It's not surprising that they jumped all over a music fan's website, nevermind that such a site couldn't possibly cost them sales and in fact could only promote interest in the band.

      What the RIAA really fears is not that someone will download the latest pop music for free, but that artists will see they don't need the RIAA anymore. They are a very expensive middleman that musicians would love to be able to get around, and are finally able to do so. This is why it is so important for the big studios to keep a tight grip on the distribution channel for as long as they can.

  9. MP3 in Name Only by ndansmith · · Score: 4, Insightful
    . . . and no other coding method so far (2005) could uncrown MP3 as the popular standard for digital music on the computer and on the Internet.

    That is the perception, at least, on the internet. Music files will probably be "MP3" for a long time, just like Pepsi is often referred to generically as a "Coke." iTunes Music Store, for example, uses .m4a and .m4p (their AAC format) file extensions. Considering that iTunes Music Store sells so many of these files (hundreds of millions), and that iTunes (a popular cross-platform music player) rips by default to .m4a, and that .mp3 is clearly behind the curve of audio compression technology, the time may be coming soon when .mp3 is king in name only.

  10. The bad old days... by decipher_saint · · Score: 5, Funny

    When I was eighteen,
    I downloaded a very good CD,
    A very good CD that took the whole night to grab,
    We found it on IRC
    My handle was brian_mcgee
    We burned it at 2 times for free
    When I was eighteen...

    With apologies to Homer, 1995 seems so long ago now...

    --
    crazy dynamite monkey
    1. Re:The bad old days... by lukewarmfusion · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I believe the apologies should really go to Frank Sinatra or Ervin M. Drake...

      (But the version from the Simpsons was wonderful, too.)

  11. I used it... by Animaether · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...and it was great! Downloaded from a BBS, had a vague description. It was like reading one of those claims about sticking a feature-length TV-res movie in only 100MB now. Couldn't believe it. Had to try anyway. Was an eye-opener, and I knew the future of music would change right there and then.

    That said.. it immediately made me look for other solutions, as nobody else could play back MP3s, and ended up using a-law and mu-law codecs from Microsoft. Smaller files than plain WAVs, not bad quality %)

    Note: I was working on sound effects back then and needed to compact them for a game. To this date, I still don't care much for CD rips and 'sharing' music :P

    1. Re:I used it... by AKAImBatman · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Downloaded from a BBS, had a vague description. It was like reading one of those claims about sticking a feature-length TV-res movie in only 100MB now.

      It was the same for me. I found it on a website somewhere, but there was no files available to plug into it. I completely forgot about it until a friend excitedly called me up and asked if I had WinPlay3. He shot me a file or two, and I was absolutely amazed. Up until then, I'd thought MOD files were the height of computer music. ;-)

  12. Sure, sure, it's 10 years old.... by Chairboy · · Score: 3, Funny

    But this is Slashdot. All we want to know is if it supports OGG vorbis.

  13. better name? by beowulfy · · Score: 2, Funny

    why didn't they just call it IS 11172-3? It just rolls off the tounge doesn't it? Then we could be all saying: "So how many IS 11172-3's do you have on your ipod?" That would be much easier.

    --
    "When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro" -Hunter S. Thompson
  14. Spoiled bastards... by MicroPat · · Score: 5, Funny

    About 7 years ago, I ripped all my CD's to MP3, amazed at how much precious HDD space I could save while accessing all my music via the same source! Now, here I am, in the hard disk gigacheap days, stuck with these lossy-format buggers while the new kids on the block rip to their slightly larger lossless formats. You lucky, spoiled bastards.

  15. 1996 MP3 file stamps by mrm677 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have about 3 gigs of MP3s with file stamps dating back to early 1996.

    Ah, the days of downloading MP3s from anonymous FTP sites on the newly installed LAN in my dormroom!

  16. Only 10 years? by Sooner+Boomer · · Score: 2, Funny

    Ha! My MP5 was made in 1985, that makes it TWENTY years old, and it *still* likes to rock 'n roll!

    --
    Chaos maximizes locally around me.
  17. Software patents are like landmines for a project. by jbn-o · · Score: 2, Insightful

    There's nothing reasonable about any software patent. Also, the terms they list on their licensing page are the terms for now; there's nothing that compels the patent holder to license any particular person or organization for any particular use of the patented ideas. The patent holder can deny you a patent license just because they want to.

    Anyone who cares about sound quality ("Use the best tool for the job!", the unending cry of /.ers in other threads) would look to other formats, lossless formats if their storage space was large enough, better lossy encoders otherwise. For years now, far more capable portable digital audio players play Ogg Vorbis and FLAC files. If I were compressing human speech and I wanted to save a lot of space, I'd still use Speex over MP3.

  18. Re:considered? by dougmc · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I severely doubt your 2400 baud or even mindblowing 14.4kbps could handle 5 meg
    A 14.4 Kbps modem can download 5 MB of data in about an hour, ignoring compression. (mp3 files can't be compressed much anyways.)

    That is certainly well within the capabilities of a modem to download. I recall downloading the SLS Linux distribution at about 30 1.4 MB floppy images, and I think I only had a 9600 bps modem. It took a while, but I got it.

    Even the solid type storage formats couldn't handle much more thna a meg. considered. hmph.
    Solid type storage formats? I'm not sure what you mean by that.

    10 years or so ago, I had a DAT drive at home, and one at work. So I used that to move stuff back and forth. It was expensive, but it held 2 GB on a single tape, far more than I'd ever need to move at once, and it was way better than trying to use floppies.

  19. Re:The tech-better isnt the all-in-wonder-solution by neurojab · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Ogg may be #1 in quality, but I seriously doubt they're #2 in popularity...

    Here's my estimate of the popularity of these formats. AAC is quite high based solely on the number of songs sold by iTunes.

    1) MP3
    2) AAC
    3) WMA
    4) Ogg?
    5) Others

  20. Oh yeah? I remember MP1 and MP2 by Jon+Abbott · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Around the time that MP3 was getting on its feet, I remember tinkering with MP1 and MP2 files... Websites like the Internet Underground Music Archive had them available for download. The thing I remember was that MP1 files played fine on a 486 50 MHz, while high-bitrate MP2 files were too choppy to play back properly. MP3s were out of the question on a 486 (until many years later when highly optimized MP3 player software emerged). I remember that even 192 kbps MP2s still had numerous audible defects in them, so 128 kbps MP3s seemed amazing in comparison. Of course, I had to decode the MP3 file to WAV before playing it. Those were the days...

  21. Why OGG Is "Better" by jcole · · Score: 5, Informative

    http://www.vorbis.com/faq.psp

    * Vorbis files can compress to a smaller file size and still sound fine
    * Vorbis' better compression will cut down on bandwidth costs
    * For a given file size, Vorbis sounds better than MP3.
    * If you decide to sell your music in MP3 format, you are responsible for paying Fraunhofer a percentage of each sale because you are using their patents.
    * Vorbis is patent and license-free, so you will never need to pay anyone in order to sell, give away, or stream your own music.
    * Epic Games (the makers of Unreal Tournament, et. al.) have used Vorbis in their games ever since releasing Unreal Tournament 2003 to compress game music without having per-game license fees sap profits from every game sold.
    * Vorbis saves developers money by avoiding patent-license fees.
    * Ogg Vorbis has been designed to completely replace all proprietary, patented audio formats. That means that you can encode all your music or audio content in Vorbis and never look back.

    Need I say more?

    -Joe

    1. Re:Why OGG Is "Better" by gdulli · · Score: 3, Insightful

      As a typical end user, not one of those reasons matters to me at all. Disk space is cheap. Why do I care about bandwidth, I'm not choosing a technology based on P2P service download speeds being an important factor. Even if I did, it wouldn't save me any bandwidth costs, it would save me the last 10% of a download wait. I'm never going to sell music and I don't give a crap about how Epic Games puts music in a game I don't even play. Or even in a game I do play. Games are priced at $5 increments, and there's little variation at that; if Epic is saving $1 per copy of UT2003 sold, they're not selling the game for $39 instead of $40. And I will never notice the different between a good-quality MP3 file and a good-quality OGG file. The comparison is only useful between high- and low-quality bitrates, independent of format. And while you assure me I can use Vorbis and never have to look back, the simple fact is that I've been using MP3 for 8 years and never once had to look back. The fact that it's "proprietary" couldn't matter less to me. "Propietary" and "bad" are not synonyms just because you decide to use them that way. Switching formats for any of these reasons is just the tail wagging the dog.

    2. Re:Why OGG Is "Better" by thunderbird46 · · Score: 2, Informative

      You don't save much disk space when you need to generate the mp3s anyway, to have something that an automotive CD/MP3 system, an iPod, and Macs running iTunes (in OS X) or XMMS (in Linux) can all handle :)

  22. Re:can we legally play MP3 on Linux? by innocent_white_lamb · · Score: 2, Informative

    http://www.real.com/ apparently has MP3 license for their Linux player. I remember reading a notice from them about that when RealPlayer 10 was first released.

    --
    If you're a zombie and you know it, bite your friend!
  23. The essential mp3 patent by tepples · · Score: 2, Informative

    There are a number of patents under the mp3 licensing group http://www.mp3licensing.com/patents/index.html. Some look like they might expire soon, I'd welcome corrections if I am wrong.

    The essential MP3 patent is listed on that page as "internal no. P3912605", which corresponds to US Patent 5,579,430. That one was filed in April 1990 and should expire in April 2010.

  24. That's nice by halcyon1234 · · Score: 2, Funny

    I mean, MP3 is great and all... but when will it support ogg-vobis?

  25. How Vorbis avoids the MP3 patents by tepples · · Score: 2, Informative

    Fraunhofer has patents on psychoacoustic compression. OGG does psychoacoustic compression.

    The patents aren't as broad as you think, and the Ogg Vorbis developers have done a good job of inventing a codec that the patent claims do not describe:

    • Fraunhofer has patents on multipass encoding of a single frame to achieve a target bitrate. Vorbis does not use multipass encoding, instead strongly preferring variable bitrate encoding at a given noise floor level. (I haven't investigated how Vorbis ABR and CBR work, but presumably it uses techniques in the prior art.)
    • Fraunhofer has patents on subdividing a spectral-transform into frequency bands and applying a uniform scale factor, determined psychoacoustically, across each band. This results in a noise floor that looks like a stairstep, with wider steps in the high frequencies. Vorbis uses a set of (frequency, amplitude) points and connects the dots to form a piecewise-linear noise floor.
  26. Re:MP3? Remember SWA by azav · · Score: 2, Interesting

    CD : Exit Planet Dust by the Chemical Brothers. I had to encode them at a rate of 98 since all I had to store them on was a 100 Meg drive. Ya. Meg. It was like 200 bucks back them.

    Who demoed it : For a short time, Apple's Phil Schiller worked at Macromedia. He was the guy. Took it to some meeting, was super cool.

    And the apps: Bingo! You got 50% of it. Back then when we were working on Shockwave Audio, SWA really was MP3 - but even we didn't know it. To the best of my knowledge, Macromedia was the first major licensee of Fraunhoffer's technology and it was used in Director, Shockwave and SoundEdit 16. The Audio was recorded and compressed with SoundEdit 16. The player was created in Director and was cross platform from the get go.

    I mentioned this to our VP, Norm and he instantly thought of issues with the MPAA so nothing became of my creation. Too bad we were a few years ahead of our time. Others, like Buzz Kettles on the SoundEdit team created simple players as well. I'm pretty sure mine was the first to create a playlist and allow songs to be selected from a list. A few months ago at a bar in San Francisco, a guy came in, recognized me and said "Zav! Hey, Do you remember when we wrote the first mp3 player ever?" Man, I had totally forgotten about it. And in case anyone cares, my name is Alex Zavatone. :]

    --
    - Zav - Imagine a Beowulf cluster of insensitive clods...
  27. Why OGG Is Worse by teneighty · · Score: 5, Insightful

    While Ogg is technically superior, it's never going to catch on because:

    • MP3 is "good enough" for many people.
    • Few players support it.
    • The name "Ogg Vorbis" is a huge handicap to overcome.

    As a geek, I'd love the see technical superiority win, but I don't think Ogg is well-positioned to have any chance of taking marketshare from MP3s.

    1. Re:Why OGG Is Worse by dmccarty · · Score: 2, Insightful
      The name "Ogg Vorbis" isa huge handicap to overcome.

      Hear, hear!

      As a proof to that I submit the "why is it named ogg vorbis" question from vorbis.com's FAQ:

      ---
      What do all the names mean?
      Ogg
      Ogg is the name of Xiph.org's container format for audio, video, and metadata.
      Vorbis
      Vorbis is the name of a specific audio compression scheme that's designed to be contained in Ogg. Note that other formats are capable of being embedded in Ogg such as FLAC and Speex.
      ---

      What the... Was this written by someone who has no desire to see the format succeed?!

      --
      Have fun: Join D.N.A. (National Dyslexics Association)
  28. You people are missing the real story... by tobiasly · · Score: 2, Funny

    Who cares about the 10th anniversary of a mediocre file format; just think: somewhere out there is a person who wakes up each morning and thinks to himself, "I wonder what news I'll find on the Data Compression News Blog today?"

    Guess I'm not as much of a geek as I thought...

  29. yes, but will it last? by Phybersyk0 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It seems to me that since storage capacities are rising while cost to the end user is falling (i.e. a 200gb drive can be purchased for around US$80) will compression even matter in another 10 years? Right now the "pirates" are starting to distribute in both AAC & APE formats (totally lossless compression) files are only marginally smaller than the standard 10mb/minute for 16-bit .wav files. I've ripped nearly ALL of my own CD's (roughly 300 CD's, at 320kbps VBR and it's only 21 Gigs of space... so what, like 4-5 DVD-9's?

  30. how about this one? by YesIAmAScript · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'm told MP2 is better at higher bitrates than MP3 is. That the extra layer 3 stuff doesn't help at higher bitrates and actually hurts.

    True? I dunno.

    As to the comments about OGG avoiding the MP3 patents, I have a couple things.

    First, at a very low level, all MP3s are VBR. It uses a "bit reservoir", and how you deplete the bit reservoir can be optimized by multi-pass recording. VBR does not preclude multi-pass encoding, nor does it even help you maintain a noise floor level any differently than multi-pass with a bit reservoir does.

    The 2nd point sounds interesting to me, it does seem like it avoids that aspect of the Fraunhofer patent.

    But in the end, I can't go into this in detail, but Fraunhofer seems to think their patents cover OGG, and when you're trying to get an mp3 license, this is an issue. Are they correct? Are they using illegal means? I'm not sure it matters, it definitely puts the chill on commercial OGG support.

    --
    http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/8/20/95
  31. the email that started it all... by dettus · · Score: 2, Interesting

    the official birthday for mp3 is july 14th, 1995, at 12:29: gmt+2.
    at this time the fraunhofer institute for integrated circuits released the following (internal) email:
    http://www.iis.fraunhofer.de/pub_rel/presse/2005/m p3/index_d.html

    translation:
    Subject: Filename extensions for Layer3: .mp3
    Hello,
    according to a huge ammount of opinions in our poll: The extension for ISO MPEG Audio Layer 3 is .mp3. In other words, we should watch upcoming WWW-pages, shareware, demos etc., for them not to use .bit-extensions. There is a reason, believe me :-)
    Juergen Zeller