IGN/Gamespy Going Public
GameDailyBiz has the news that gaming media powerhouse IGN is going public. From the press release: "IGN owners Great Hill partners were recently looking for someone to purchase the company, and then priced IGN for over $800 million dollars. According to Media Metrix, IGN and its sister sites attract over 25 million users a month. This includes GameSpy, RottenTomatoes, FilePlanet, TeamXbox, and VE3D. IGN also provides online gaming technology for hundreds of video game developers."
As if IGN wasn't a crappy enough site already, now we've got the shareholders to put their worthless voices in on it too... Public corporations are a waste of time if you want to do anything more than make money...
"A truly wise man realizes he knows nothing."
IGN is complete shit. Their reviews are worth less than the data that stores them. I'd rather just pay a monkey to hoot and holler and act excited - at least you know the monkey is honest. Their sites are so jam packed full of ads its not even funny. And who gives a f*** what their stupid staff is playing right now?
Don't even get me started about fileplanet. I don't want to sign up to IGN's marketing system just to get a game patch, and I don't want to pay to do it either.
I hope IGN gets bought up by someone who promptly fires off the entire staff and turns it into, well, its hard to make it worse, so just fire the staff.
Nowadays you have to get to the central hub www.gamerankings.com. They link you directly to the game in an organized format may I add.
The only thing SPECIAL about gamespy not matched anywhere else is http://archive.gamespy.com/stats/
which gives you almost realtime statistics on the most popular games online. If there is anything better, let me know.
(I am not associated in any way with metacritic or IGN, this is just my honest opinion)
I usually go to metacritic.com for reviews of games. They take a lot of reviews from other sites, convert their ratings to a '0 to 100' scale and calculate an average score.
I've found that these scores reflect my own opinion most of the time (not always).
Now, IGN's score is usually close to the average score. This indicates to me that they are not very biased at all. And I usually find the reviews themselves to be pretty good as well. They cover all the aspects of the game and give a good impression.
Now, I am naive or missing something?
I do agree that sometimes the add overdose can be annoying, but I think the content of IGN is just fine.