Really? Bullshit. Teachers care about the quality of students' education, which is why they're fighting the attempt to remove teachers and just send students to some online video.
And why wouldn't the government feel it should regulate pollution?
"That would be difficult in a country where the government feels it has the right to interfere with the market at any time in any way for any reason. You can hardly blame the free market for screwups in a country where the government feels it has the right to control mercury and arsenic."
Teachers don't make anywhere near that, even when you adjust with their benefits:
"In May 2009, preschool teachers in Wisconsin earned an average salary of $23,460, elementary school teachers earned $51,240, and secondary school teachers earned $49,400. (2) Education and experience level also make a difference in teacher salaries: secondary school teachers in the 90th wage percentile earned $69,550, while the entry-level teacher salary is generally in the $30,000s. (3)" http://www.teacher-world.com/teacher-salary/wisconsin.html
That's not factoring in their retirement, which from an older WI gov site looked to be around 6-12% (hard to gather as the PDF wasn't talking about that).
This $100,000 lie is crap thrown out by political opponents trying to make teachers be the next welfare queens. It's a lie.
Yet another "if you don't subscribe to the current global warming facts you are an idiot"
Well, yes, if they are facts, then 'not believing' in them makes you an idiot. You can still debate, but there are certain facts in the global warming debate that are not debatable.
The article is talking about those who completely deny all facts. The fact you get offended and consider it 'the voice of the democratic party' means you're probably more in the ideology camp than you are in the science camp.
"We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America."
Slashdot Mirror
No, because there's no 'bias discrimination' involved there.
Read the actual case and arguments before you comment.
Or it could be that the negatives outweigh the positives; for example, please explain how increasing ocean acidification is good.
What? The IPCC was just collecting already published data, there was no 'new' studies done.
Careful - your bias is shining through.
Maybe you should just do some reading: http://www.skepticalscience.com/argument.php
Start with #1.
Your source proving the fraud accusation?
Last I checked, Mann had been cleared by not one, not two, at least t-h-r-e-e different boards of inquiry.
and allow instant startup of applications (something Java has spent the last 15 years not delivering)
Was that ever promised? As a Java developer, I really don't remember seeing "INSTANT STARTUP!" on JDK release notes/upcoming feature list.
Hey, does Dart solve global warming? Cause that's something Google has yet to deliver in the last 5 years...
Wow, talk about some crazy links there. Kids are being forced to get dangerous medications? Really?
That's easy: get the government out of the way. Then parents will send their kids to good schools and bad schools will go bust.
Right. Because poor people or people living in bad school districts ALWAYS have the option of doing that.
lol he'll love that one...
and by the way, why is that show on so often? I swear, every other week they play it..
Really? Bullshit. Teachers care about the quality of students' education, which is why they're fighting the attempt to remove teachers and just send students to some online video.
Yes, because if we pretend the rest of the world doesn't exist, we'll solve everything!
Try breathing it and you might think differently.
Wrong - you elect the federal government. Stop electing asshats and you can change it.
And why wouldn't the government feel it should regulate pollution?
"That would be difficult in a country where the government feels it has the right to interfere with the market at any time in any way for any reason. You can hardly blame the free market for screwups in a country where the government feels it has the right to control mercury and arsenic."
See how that sounds?
"In short, you're proposing what's essentially a vice tax - have these ever worked?"
Compare smoking rates today to twenty years ago?
Please cite when in history cutting taxes led to increased revenue. Otherwise, we thought you were dead Mr Reagan, so please act that way.
What the hell are you smoking?
Teachers don't make anywhere near that, even when you adjust with their benefits:
"In May 2009, preschool teachers in Wisconsin earned an average salary of $23,460, elementary school teachers earned $51,240, and secondary school teachers earned $49,400. (2) Education and experience level also make a difference in teacher salaries: secondary school teachers in the 90th wage percentile earned $69,550, while the entry-level teacher salary is generally in the $30,000s. (3)"
http://www.teacher-world.com/teacher-salary/wisconsin.html
That's not factoring in their retirement, which from an older WI gov site looked to be around 6-12% (hard to gather as the PDF wasn't talking about that).
This $100,000 lie is crap thrown out by political opponents trying to make teachers be the next welfare queens. It's a lie.
Yet another "if you don't subscribe to the current global warming facts you are an idiot"
Well, yes, if they are facts, then 'not believing' in them makes you an idiot. You can still debate, but there are certain facts in the global warming debate that are not debatable.
The article is talking about those who completely deny all facts. The fact you get offended and consider it 'the voice of the democratic party' means you're probably more in the ideology camp than you are in the science camp.
Orly?
"We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America."
With money?
Those damn cockuckingers!
Loved this!
So...you point to the now completely debunked 'climategate' bull, and a book on amazon.
You must have a Ph. D. from liberty university!
What I want to know is - when will kdawson not be such a tool?
However, it has not been shown that humans are the primary cause of this warming.
Incorrect, it has: Empirical evidence that humans are causing global warming