ESRB Revokes San Andreas Rating
Alex Blonski writes "In a stunning move, the ESRB has advised retailers to stop selling Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas. This report follows public pressure over the Hot Coffee debacle. Rockstar, the publishers of the game have given retailers the option of restickering the game with an 18+ rating or exchanging it for a new version with the controversial content removed. ESRB head Patricia Vance says 'After a thorough investigation, we have concluded that sexually explicit material exists in a fully rendered, unmodified form on the final discs of all three platform versions of the game (i.e., PC CD-ROM, Xbox and PS2). However, the material was programmed by Rockstar to be inaccessible to the player and they have stated that it was never intended to be made accessible. The material can only be accessed by downloading a software patch, created by an independent third party without Rockstar's permission, which is now freely available on the internet and through console accessories. Considering the existence of the undisclosed and highly pertinent content on the final discs, compounded by the broad distribution of the third party modification, the credibility and utility of the initial ESRB rating has been seriously undermined.'"
I believe that Penny Arcade's news and comic today sum up this whole situation best.
Work sucked, until it became unemployment, when it became slightly more tolerable. -Tet
GTA San Andreas "Hot Coffee"
s /hotcoffee.wmv
Coral Cache of some of the content in question:
http://files.gtanet.com.nyud.net:8090/gtasa/video
Get it while it's hot?
Today's Penny Arcade news deals with this, where Tycho lays out the crucial difference between a "Mature" title and an "Adults Only" title : time.
Yup, that's it. Time. Pretty incredible.
-EvilMagnus
Yes, running around carjacking cars, shooting people, and beating up whores is American as apple pie but SEX?!?! OMFG...what are you people thinking?!
Any man who afflicts the human race with ideas must be prepared to see them misunderstood. -- H. L. Mencken
As an ex-game programmer, there's TONS of stuff we left in various games. Some intentional, some not so intentional.
I can't speak for how GTA is setup, but in our case some of the stuff went out because of a lock down in the code/data. When *any* change would be considered a potential to introduce bugs it was safer to lock down *everything* and go as it was.
"After a thorough investigation, we have concluded that sexually explicit material exists in a fully rendered, unmodified form on the final discs". That's why they're changing the rating. Of course they don't rule on completely player-created content.
I am trolling
on the sims2 there is a simple one word cheat you can type and eliminate the blurring, giving you access to far more nudity and sex than the hot coffie hack, to be fair the hot coffie section is more graphic. but the sims 2 is still rated T
I used to have a cool sig, back when I cared
And thanks to internet, they can learn how to use it coorectly:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fuck
Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
Basically Wal-mart won't carry AO.
Senate Testimony to that effect
That is all.
A Game Shark modifies memory locations within a game.
It's, gasp, modifying the game!
Cheat codes are things you type in in the game. There is no way, within GTA, to get to this minigame, via pressing buttons, documented or otherwise, or doing things with your character.
Seriously, we're having some sort of total terminology failure here.
Here is the actual facts. If anyone is found repeating anything else, they will be beaten publically, and a minigame around that will be included in the next GTA:
This minigame, like all minigame, is enabled when you do certain things. Rockstar removed these things from the game, and thus you cannot, under any circumstances, get to the minigame from within the game.
What all the mods do, either the Game Shark or the saved game hack, is tell GTA that you have, in fact, completed these nonexistent prerequisites.
There is a debate if one of the hacks adds a nude texture for the female, but I don't see any evidence of that.
If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?