Slashdot Mirror


ESRB Revokes San Andreas Rating

Alex Blonski writes "In a stunning move, the ESRB has advised retailers to stop selling Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas. This report follows public pressure over the Hot Coffee debacle. Rockstar, the publishers of the game have given retailers the option of restickering the game with an 18+ rating or exchanging it for a new version with the controversial content removed. ESRB head Patricia Vance says 'After a thorough investigation, we have concluded that sexually explicit material exists in a fully rendered, unmodified form on the final discs of all three platform versions of the game (i.e., PC CD-ROM, Xbox and PS2). However, the material was programmed by Rockstar to be inaccessible to the player and they have stated that it was never intended to be made accessible. The material can only be accessed by downloading a software patch, created by an independent third party without Rockstar's permission, which is now freely available on the internet and through console accessories. Considering the existence of the undisclosed and highly pertinent content on the final discs, compounded by the broad distribution of the third party modification, the credibility and utility of the initial ESRB rating has been seriously undermined.'"

80 of 913 comments (clear)

  1. People are still having sex by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    This makes me want to kill the ESRB board, but I will do one better, I will run around naked in front of them. Well at least now we have a new scapegoat, the Doom one was getting old...

    1. Re:People are still having sex by Valiss · · Score: 5, Funny

      This makes me want to kill the ESRB board, but I will do one better, I will run around naked in front of them.

      Whoa! Hold up there, champ. It's one thing to threaten some violence, but threatening nudity? Now you've gone too far! Think of the children!!

      --

      -Valiss
    2. Re:People are still having sex by badmammajamma · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yes, running around carjacking cars, shooting people, and beating up whores is American as apple pie but SEX?!?! OMFG...what are you people thinking?!

      --
      Any man who afflicts the human race with ideas must be prepared to see them misunderstood. -- H. L. Mencken
    3. Re:People are still having sex by turgid · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Pah! Nudity? What about consensual constructive adult nudity as an act of love which is intended to create new life?

      Come to think of it, no. Bring on the guns and bombs.

    4. Re:People are still having sex by Digital+Vomit · · Score: 4, Insightful
      What about consensual constructive adult nudity as an act of love which is intended to create new life?

      I don't think I've ever seen that in a game, and rarely have I seen in in movies. Screwing and fucking in lust, yes, but never what you described.

      --
      Modern copyright is theft of culture from everyone and it retards the progress of the useful arts and sciences.
    5. Re:People are still having sex by Vulture101 · · Score: 5, Insightful


      Just like in the dark ages: you can have public executions and torture sessions but you cant even _think_ about sex.

      history repeats itself...

    6. Re:People are still having sex by Caiwyn · · Score: 3, Interesting

      This makes me want to kill the ESRB board

      Why? They gave GTA:SA the M rating based on the footage that Rockstar provided, and Rockstar wasn't forthcoming about the content that was on the disc -- even if the mini-game wasn't easily accessible, now all it takes is a modified save game file. Why shouldn't the ESRB revoke the rating?

      Regardless of whether you think the footage is "dangerous to children" or whatever, the fact of the matter is that Rockstar misrepresented themselves and their game, and now that they've been caught, the ESRB is entirely within its rights -- in fact, if the ESRB hadn't done this, then there would be no validity to the rating system that keeps those political monkeys off the industry's back.

      As far as I'm concerned, Rockstar got what was coming to them. Their peers in the video game industry should be outraged that they would pull the wool over the eyes of the ESRB, which exists to help protect all of them from being regulated by would-be thought police.

    7. Re:People are still having sex by alan_dershowitz · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yeah, cuz "Hot Coffee" is all about the procreative "love". Right there in between the homicide.

    8. Re:People are still having sex by squoozer · · Score: 5, Funny

      running around carjacking cars

      Erm, what else would you carjack? Zimmer frames maybe?

      --
      I used to have a better sig but it broke.
    9. Re:People are still having sex by doubledoh · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Maybe that's because there's nothing wrong with sex.

      --
      I think, therefore I doh.
    10. Re:People are still having sex by doubledoh · · Score: 4, Funny
      'Hot Coffee' depicts a blowjob.

      I find it amusing and ironic that Hillary Clinton is spearheading the crackdown on this game especially in light of this particular content...

      Perhaps she's focusing her anger in the wrong place?

      --
      I think, therefore I doh.
    11. Re:People are still having sex by lymond01 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Attitudes about sex are strongly influenced by culture.

      If only there were more gangs throwing condoms or orgy invitations out their windows instead of bullets...

    12. Re:People are still having sex by arkanes · · Score: 4, Insightful
      No, they got the M rating based on the game as shipped. I can make my desktop background tiled pictures of enourmous penises with less effort than it would take anyone to unlock this content in GTA. Where the hell is the AO rating on Windows?

      In fairness, Tycho has a point. We let a lot of crap slide. By all rights, GTA as shipped should have had an AO. Halo should have had an AO. The difference between the M rating and the AO rating is *one year* and a bunch of sales - it's stupid. It's exactly the same with movies, too. But as a culture we're hypocrites and every so often we need to sacrifice someone up the "think of the children" gods, and Rockstar certainly has put themselves out there to be the goat.

      If you, as parent, approved of GTA for your child last week, and now don't because a patch downloaded from the internet can show you non-explicit sex, then you're a shitty excuse for a parent and a worse one for a human, and regardless what Rockstar did or didn't do, and regardless of they hypocritical bullshit pandering that the ESRB and our politicians do, you shouldn't have any say in what *any* child does. To anyone with half a brain, this is a non-issue.

    13. Re:People are still having sex by pyrrhonist · · Score: 4, Funny
      'Hot Coffee' depicts a blowjob. There'll be no new life coming from that

      I would hope not, because it would be really unseemly if women could deliver babies by reverse peristalsis.

      *baaaaaaarrrrrffff* WAAAAAHH!!!

      --
      Show me on the doll where his noodly appendage touched you.
    14. Re:People are still having sex by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Look, including the content and making it inaccessible without a minor hack is no accident. It's a brilliant move. But it's disingenous to think that they "didn't mean" for anyone to access it.

      Think about it: all the people with the PS/2 or Xbox version of the game who ran out and actually bought the PC version of the game just so they could use the Hot Coffee mod. The fact that it's going to be rated "AO" now is irrelevant - sales are going to soar for the title no matter what.

      The ESRB is doing exactly what it should, and, to be honest, Rockstar is still going to benefit from it. Penny Arcade was right about just how disingenous the cries of innocence on the part of Rockstar really are. If ESRB didn't act, it would become irrelevant - and less voluntary measures would come into force.

      I can't believe that no one realizes how Rockstar has had a win-win situation in all this all along.

    15. Re:People are still having sex by Flunitrazepam · · Score: 5, Funny

      "Sex isn't rare."

      You must be new here

      --
      1) Your analysis is based on bad assumptions so your result is way off. 2) You're a sick bastard for fucking a horse.
    16. Re:People are still having sex by Nataku564 · · Score: 3, Funny

      I so wish I had mod points right now :)

    17. Re:People are still having sex by oldwolf13 · · Score: 3, Funny

      > What about consensual constructive adult nudity as an act of love which is intended to create new life?

      >>I don't think I've ever seen that in a game, and rarely have I seen in in movies.Screwing and fucking in lust, yes, but never what you described.

      Dude... you've been renting the wrong pornos.

      --
      If I can't smoke and swear I'm fucked.
    18. Re:People are still having sex by Drathos · · Score: 3, Funny

      Zambonis!

      --
      End of line..
    19. Re:People are still having sex by starakurva · · Score: 4, Funny

      Perhaps Evilpiper would have gotten a few mod points and a "funny" if only he'd put his "list" in a different order, forming a different acronym...

      --
      All you need is lurv.
    20. Re:People are still having sex by BackInIraq · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The difference between the M rating and the AO rating is *one year* and a bunch of sales - it's stupid. It's exactly the same with movies, too.

      No, even with movies the difference between R and NC-17 is a lot larger. For those that may not know, any parent can take their 6 year old kid into an R-rated movie at the theater. But if a movie is rated NC-17, children CANNOT attend, even with parents present. This is the reason that most theaters will not take up screenspace with NC-17 movies...the market is a lot smaller, because parents are unable to make the decision for themselves.

      A parent can, however, choose to buy an AO rated game for their kids.

      If you, as parent, approved of GTA for your child last week, and now don't because a patch downloaded from the internet can show you non-explicit sex, then you're a shitty excuse for a parent and a worse one for a human, and regardless what Rockstar did or didn't do, and regardless of they hypocritical bullshit pandering that the ESRB and our politicians do, you shouldn't have any say in what *any* child does. To anyone with half a brain, this is a non-issue.

      Especially because last week the game was already rated M, and recommended only for age 17 and up. Unless I'm mistaken, a large portion of American teenagers age 17 and up have already had sex. It's the stupid-ass parents who didn't understand what an M rating meant and bought it for their 12 year olds that are getting so upset. And I say screw those idiots.

  2. In other news... by DeathPenguin · · Score: 5, Insightful

    In a move equally stunning to neglegent parents everywhere, Captain Obvious has advised that people stop paying attention to the ESRB and take a more proactive stance in monitoring the content that they're buying for their kids. He also advised that parents pay more attention to other aspects of games, such as violence and racial overtones, and not use sex alone as a deciding factor for whether or not to buy a game, movie, music CD, etc. Experts predict that people will ignore this advice and continue to rely on other people to raise their kids for them.

    1. Re:In other news... by spiricom · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Being a relatively old fart (32), I have to ask: do any stores/regions in the USA actually card people buying an 18+ ESRB game? Since this is a self-imposed rating system (?), is there much enforcement?

    2. Re:In other news... by fbartho · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I personally think its gotta get boring to have to keep repeating that mantra over and over again. You're a parent, its your job to raise your kids. Its ultimately your responsibility. All these social systems to supposedly protect your children are really there to protect your children if you don't do a good enough job in protecting them yourself. This means that broadcast TV had pressures to be family oriented, both because parents wanted to be able to watch things with their kids, but also because TV would be a convenient device that serves as an electronic nanny. As long as the runt is glued to the TV/Game Console, they can't fall down the stairs with scissors. The problem comes from the things we don't normally view as sharp/dangerous, that are corrupting our kids minds. Raising a kid is a full-time job, at times more than even 2 people can comfortably handle. There is risk in the real world, but every parent has to choose what is an acceptable risk level for kids. If they err on the side of danger, their kids may get hurt, and it will be their fault.

      --
      Gravity Sucks
    3. Re:In other news... by Admiral+Ackbar+8 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      A kid (clearly around 13) at EBGames in line in front of me tried to buy it (GTA:SA, long before Hot Coffee). The guy behind the desk asked for his ID. The kid said he didn't have one; the EB guy said that he couldn't buy the game. Simple as that! The kid walked away embarrassed, as he should be.

    4. Re:In other news... by Ryan+Stortz · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think the ESRB is doing a great job, and it'd be a shame if people started to ignore them. Compared to the MPAA and RIAA equivlents, it's amazing. The RIAA's simply is the "Explicit Content" sticker, where the MPAA's is the G/PG/PG-13/R/NC-17. Not until recently has the R rating included why it got the rating, and even then it's only flashed for half a second. I've yet to see the expanded warning label on a movie poster. I've really only seen it flashed in trailers and on the back of DVDs, which come out months later.

      Now, look at the ESRB's rating system. It has the same generalized ratings: EC/E/E10+/T/M/AO+. It also includes 32 content descriptors, ranging from Tobacco Reference to Comic Mischief to Edutainment. It's much more comprehensive than the others.

      What I'd really hate to see is Rockstar going the movie studio route and releasing a game as "UNRATED" rather than accept the dreaded "AO+" rating. It is a very unfortunate loophole, and hopefully the big boys won't carry unrated games.

      Also, I'd like to point out that this entire thing is 100% Rockstar's fault. They're required to send video footage to the ESRB that covers the overall gameplay of the game, as well as the game's most explicit scenes. The ESRB uses that footage to rate the game, if Rockstar didn't include it then the ESRB can't really be at fault.

      --
      Bugs are just features that have been fixed.
    5. Re:In other news... by Sheetrock · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Since this "tough on media violence/obscenity" rhetoric has been stepped up again, I've noticed at two stores a new policy of asking for a birthdate or age before selling both games and movies with an ESRB M/MPAA R rating. No carding yet, although I bet it happens if you look younger than 17 or the checkout staff is in a bad mood.

      It's annoying enough that I'm just buying my media online now.

      What bothers me is that irregardless of the fact that this game is effectively a murder/obscenity simulator that should never fall into the hands of children forcing Rockstar to recall/modify their game or be relabeled AO is effectively censorship, albeit one that takes advantage of economics rather than legal force to effect the views of the minority over the majority. Most stores refuse to carry AO titles and therefore artificially decrease the audience for the game, putting severe pressure on the manufacturer to cater to the distribution chain by watering down their content or simply shelve products that would have been successes but for the fact that they are offered only through adult-only resellers (a chilling effect on customers who simply want to enjoy a game released as the developer intended without having porn businesses appear on their credit card statements.)

      --

      Try not. Do or do not, there is no try.
      -- Dr. Spock, stardate 2822-3.




    6. Re:In other news... by Rei · · Score: 4, Funny

      Bah! Captain Obvious is one to talk, given that his video game ("Captain Obvious vs. the Braindead Senators") had a patch that enabled such a scene as well (in which, for the most part) Captain Obvious stood on the sidelines, watching and snidely pointing out the fundamentals every time one participant did something wrong).

      --
      Point of interest. Offering to shoot us might not work so well as an incentive as you might imagine.
    7. Re:In other news... by Ravatar · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Rockstar did not give out documentation on how to enable the mod, and included no mechanics to access it. A game should not be rated by third party patches and mods.

      There are nude patches for the Sims, but you don't see little Suzie being carded for a new expansion every month, and you certainly don't see it getting slapped with a M or AO rating.

    8. Re:In other news... by st1d · · Score: 3, Funny

      >> Society does need some regulation of public behavior for public good though.

      That concept has always seemed a little redundant to me. Why is it okay for parents to swear like hell around (at) their kids, but the moment someone on TV does it, it's time to light the torches?

      >>but broadcast television is in some way public behavior, because of its wide exposure.

      I hope so, or it wouldn't be broadcast, would it?

      >>Wide release movies are similar as well.

      Small-release foreign "artsy" films, regardless of the sexual nature, are better, because it only creates a handful of psychopathic deviants.

      >>To ask parents to put their kids in a cocoon and never let them out (they may get exposed to something horrible outside of the house), is unreasonable.

      Which is why it is better to expose your children, under your careful supervision, to the things they might encounter once they have grown. You don't protect a child from falling down the stairs by preventing him/her from ever seeing steps until they move out of the house, you keep them safe by putting barriers in the way, and gradually you remove the barriers, and give them the guidance and protection they need until they can handle them on their own.

      >>At some point you have to regulate some things everyone gets exposed to so that some of them don't have psychological trauma from the experience.

      I agree. Parents should be put away if their kid walks in on them when they're having sex. Screwed me up for years... :)

      --
      Microsoft has just released their much anticipated hands-free cordless mouse. Warning, it may hurt a little at first.
    9. Re:In other news... by The+Ultimate+Fartkno · · Score: 3, Funny
      one of those pet peaves pounded in to me
      speaking of peeves...
    10. Re:In other news... by DavidTC · · Score: 3, Informative
      Game Shark codes are not cheat codes.

      A Game Shark modifies memory locations within a game.

      It's, gasp, modifying the game!

      Cheat codes are things you type in in the game. There is no way, within GTA, to get to this minigame, via pressing buttons, documented or otherwise, or doing things with your character.

      Seriously, we're having some sort of total terminology failure here.

      Here is the actual facts. If anyone is found repeating anything else, they will be beaten publically, and a minigame around that will be included in the next GTA:

      This minigame, like all minigame, is enabled when you do certain things. Rockstar removed these things from the game, and thus you cannot, under any circumstances, get to the minigame from within the game.

      What all the mods do, either the Game Shark or the saved game hack, is tell GTA that you have, in fact, completed these nonexistent prerequisites.

      There is a debate if one of the hacks adds a nude texture for the female, but I don't see any evidence of that.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
  3. In further news... by Werkhaus · · Score: 5, Funny

    People found to be naked under clothes.

  4. No Sex please, we are Br^H^H by DF5JT · · Score: 4, Funny

    Merkins.

    'Nuff said.

  5. priorities? by huphtur · · Score: 3, Insightful

    One can show pixel people gettin blown up by all kinds of pixel weapons, yet when there's one pixel nipple to be seen, the whole country goes up in arms about it?

  6. nice publicity by lecithin · · Score: 4, Interesting

    "However, the material was programmed by Rockstar to be inaccessible to the player and they have stated that it was never intended to be made accessible."

    Right. Sure.

    What would the reason be to put it in there then? Perhaps the publicity that they are getting now? My 8 y/o son would not have known about GTA except that it has been in the news lately. (Yep, an 8 y/o that watches the news)

    "Rockstar, the publishers of the game have given retailers the option of restickering the game with an 18+ rating or exchanging it for a new version with the controversial content removed."

    Well, I suspect that most will put a sticker on the game and continue to sell as usual. I also suspect that if a 15 y/o wants to buy one, they still will be able to do so.

    --
    It could be worse, it could be Monday.
    1. Re:nice publicity by Acy+James+Stapp · · Score: 4, Insightful

      As a game developer, sometimes you write something and the suits say you can't put it in, so you just comment out the call to activate it. It's a lot easier than pulling all the source and assets out of the game. Time pressures abound and a thirty-second fix impresses the higher-ups a lot more than a two-day hunt to find and remove all of the offending assets.

      --
      -- Too lazy to get a lower UID.
    2. Re:nice publicity by the_skywise · · Score: 4, Informative

      As an ex-game programmer, there's TONS of stuff we left in various games. Some intentional, some not so intentional.

      I can't speak for how GTA is setup, but in our case some of the stuff went out because of a lock down in the code/data. When *any* change would be considered a potential to introduce bugs it was safer to lock down *everything* and go as it was.

  7. Hmm.. by trmj · · Score: 4, Informative

    I believe that Penny Arcade's news and comic today sum up this whole situation best.

    --
    Work sucked, until it became unemployment, when it became slightly more tolerable. -Tet
  8. The Video by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    GTA San Andreas "Hot Coffee"

    Coral Cache of some of the content in question:

    http://files.gtanet.com.nyud.net:8090/gtasa/videos /hotcoffee.wmv

    Get it while it's hot?

  9. Is "The Sims" also rated AO? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    because of the "nude Sims" patch floating around?

    1. Re:Is "The Sims" also rated AO? by m50d · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I know people don't RTFA, but is it too much to ask to RTFSummary? "After a thorough investigation, we have concluded that sexually explicit material exists in a fully rendered, unmodified form on the final discs". That's the difference.

      --
      I am trolling
    2. Re:Is "The Sims" also rated AO? by Nf1nk · · Score: 4, Informative

      on the sims2 there is a simple one word cheat you can type and eliminate the blurring, giving you access to far more nudity and sex than the hot coffie hack, to be fair the hot coffie section is more graphic. but the sims 2 is still rated T

      --
      I used to have a cool sig, back when I cared
  10. What if... by Psionicist · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This is rediciulous. What if I release a patch that will just replace the textures of any game (say Windows Solitair, or some Harry Potter game) with hardcore porn? Assume the patch becomes widespread after the game has been released.

    Will this... organization... advise stores to stop sell this game too?

    1. Re:What if... by m50d · · Score: 3, Informative

      "After a thorough investigation, we have concluded that sexually explicit material exists in a fully rendered, unmodified form on the final discs". That's why they're changing the rating. Of course they don't rule on completely player-created content.

      --
      I am trolling
  11. America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    As a British person (of 15 years of age), I pity you Americans. What the fuck is your problem with the human body? Why an 18+ when the 17+ was appropriate for the game, even with the minigame?

    1. Re:America by RexRhino · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Pity yourself. All video games in England need to go through the British Board of Film Censors, and some have already been banned (no video games have been banned in the United States, by the way). GTA:SA is ALREADY rated 18+ in England. British regulation is far more strict than in the United States.

      The difference is that in the U.S. censorship is still controversial, where as in the U.K. is happens without anyone taking a notice.

    2. Re:America by learn+fast · · Score: 3, Insightful

      A further difference is that the British rating is based on violence, and the new American rating is based on the sudden horrific discovery of sex mixed in with the violence.

    3. Re:America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The difference is that in the UK, games with an 18+ rating still sell, stores still stock them, there's no problem. A game company can make an 18+ game, and still make money.

      Censorship exists in the US, just in the guise of something else.

  12. 17+, 18+, whatever... by ivan256 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Clearly in that critical year you become mature enough to be allowed to consume renderings of fully clothed individuals in sexual positions.

    Seventeen year-olds just aren't ready for that kind of stuff yet. Their exposure to sexual situations should be limited to what they do with their boyfriends/girlfriends in the back seat of their parent's car when they're "at the movies."

    Oh, BTW, to all the parents out there... Your 8 year old probably says 'fuck' all the time when he knows you're not around, so you can get over yourself already.

    1. Re:17+, 18+, whatever... by houghi · · Score: 4, Informative

      And thanks to internet, they can learn how to use it coorectly:
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fuck

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  13. Glad I bought it last week, then. by EvilMagnus · · Score: 3, Informative
    I thought something like this might happen. It's asinine, but pretty predictable.

    Today's Penny Arcade news deals with this, where Tycho lays out the crucial difference between a "Mature" title and an "Adults Only" title : time.
    The ESRB is suggesting that they may change the rating of the game to Adults Only, a category that by their own definition should see a great deal more use in a retail environment. This is great. Look at the descriptions for these.

    MATURETitles rated M (Mature) have content that may be suitable for persons ages 17 and older. Titles in this category may contain intense violence, blood and gore, sexual content, and/or strong language.

    Or, as the rest of our culture calls it, "Rated R." Check out AO.

    ADULTS ONLY Titles rated AO (Adults Only) have content that should only be played by persons 18 years and older. Titles in this category may include prolonged scenes of intense violence and/or graphic sexual content and nudity.

    This can't seriously be their distinction. The scenes are longer? I played Resident Evil 4 nearly 26 hours, all told. I'm going to say that maybe nineteen hours of it was spent looking down the iron sights at humanoids. The reality is that once a person is 18, a violent videogame is fairly minor in the spectrum of "adult" content available to that person. Looking over my collection, if the duration of the violence is the distinguishing factor, I'm trying to figure out what purpose Mature serves other than to remove the stigma from otherwise "adult" content and grease the wheels at retail.
    Yup, that's it. Time. Pretty incredible.
    --
    -EvilMagnus
  14. A generation is saved! by TopShelf · · Score: 5, Insightful

    From TFA:

    Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. (NASDAQ: TTWO - News) announced today that the Entertainment Software Rating Board (ESRB) has changed the rating of Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas on all platforms from "Mature 17+" (M) to "Adults Only 18+"

    So basically, they've made the decision that 17 year-olds just shouldn't see this two-bit low-res porn hack, and stick with the carjacking, wanton murder, and other wholesome activites within GTA. 18 year-olds are qualified for the whole ball o' wax, though.

    Amazing...

    --
    Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
  15. Beginning of the End by Shky · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This whole debacle is bad news. If retailers don't stop selling it, we're all in trouble. If the ESRB loses all credibility, the only thing stopping a full-on onslaught of legislative parenting will be gone. If the video game industry 'can't be trusted' to rule itself, the government will have to step in. Australia-like bans will be coming to a USA and Canada near you.

    --
    CC Licensed Serialized Story and Podcast: Ingenioustries
  16. Also in further news by pHatidic · · Score: 5, Funny

    Bicycles are made illegal because children can go on the Internet and download porn.

  17. Re:Of course by NineNine · · Score: 5, Funny

    If that's true, then I need to look into changing my citizenship status to become French! I'll take sex over violence *any day*.

  18. sex? by DanThe1Man · · Score: 5, Funny

    I can get sex in a patch now? Like Nicorette?

    That would save a lot of wrist strain.

  19. Which Really Is Worse Anyway? by ausoleil · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The thing that amuses me the most about this whole episode is that senators and other publicity hounds never noticed the game when it was just violence, madness and mayhem, but shock of shocks, a character "gets a cup of coffee" and skin friction ensues, and the next thing you know, this is the worst thing that could ever possibly have happened to our kids!

    Me, I would prefer my kid watch a porn flick any day rather than "Natural Born Killers" or play a video game with tawdry pixels as opposed to trying to see how many crimes can be committed in order to get a high score.

    After all, who gets hurt by a good (consensual) boffing?

    Well, yeah, I know about sex and responsiblity. So spare me the usual screed. But if you do, pleas explain at the same time a way to "responsibly" carjack or murder someone.

  20. Hillary using it to get re-elected... by HockeyPuck · · Score: 4, Insightful

    In other news...

    Hillary Clinton (who makes ~$162k http://people.howstuffworks.com/question449.htm) has decided that it's in her best interest to waste her time (and our tax dollars). I'm sure that the FTC has better things to do than to investigate RockStar Entertainment... http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/4682533.stm

  21. this is the hard way to see porn via internet by pezpunk · · Score: 5, Insightful

    i mean really. if a kid can download and apply a patch, he is already in a position to see way more nudity than what is offered in this game.

    you may think that's a strawman, bringing up internet porn, but think about it. the point of the ESRB rating is to inform the parents of the content of the game. which, in my opinion, the "M" rating did accurately. the sex scenes aren't in the game. they were disabled.

    from a parent's standpoint, what is the difference between downloading a third-party mod that enables disabled content, and applying a third-party mod that adds newly-created content? they are identical in their difficulty/accessibility to a kid, and both insert content into the game that the developer did not intend to appear there!

    it is drawing boobies on the title page of "Harry Potter" and then sueing JK Rowling, citing an unfinished but steamy scene she deleted from her hard drive as evidence.

    --
    i could live a little longer in this prison
    1. Re:this is the hard way to see porn via internet by cmdr_beeftaco · · Score: 4, Funny

      Depends. Are they big boobs?

    2. Re:this is the hard way to see porn via internet by coopaq · · Score: 5, Insightful
      i mean really. if a kid can download and apply a patch, he is already in a position to see way more nudity than what is offered in this game.

      Children aren't bothered by nudity. Only the adults are.

  22. Re:What's REALLY sad.... by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 3, Funny

    Maybe your grandfather's girlfriend shouldn't have been such whore to have had sex with your cousin.

  23. When did America lose its mind? by defile · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The game allows you to...

    • Pull people out of their cars and drive away in them
    • Steal military weapons
    • Destroy property
    • Injure and kill completely innocent bystanders
    • Develop a criminal enterprise
    • Carry out the orders of corrupt police officers
    • Pick up prostitutes
    • Burn down a pot farm
    and so far it's been pretty smooth sailing, but once you can have vivid consensual sex, but only through extensive third party modification, everyone flips out?!
    1. Re:When did America lose its mind? by Soporific · · Score: 4, Funny

      Well, I was with you on everything until you said burn down a pot farm. Now that is just wrong!

      ~S

    2. Re:When did America lose its mind? by fonetik · · Score: 5, Funny
      You really should incorporate into this list that you can actually beat a hooker, or anyone for that matter, to death with a large purple dildo.

      ...but nipples are absolutely for adults only.

  24. Wow by quantaman · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Am I the only one completely overwhelmed by the sheer idiocy of this situation?

    I mean ignoring the fact that violence is alright while sexual intercourse sparks a massive outrage.

    The content is UNPLAYABLE!!! It cannot be played! If you get a copy of the game can you just pop it in and see this naughty content?
    No.
    Why?
    Because it's UNPLAYABLE!!

    Wait!! You mean you can download something off the internet that lets you play this naughty content **GASP** What an outrage!! That someone going onto the internet could gain access to pornographic content. It's completely unheard of. Clearly this is a matter of national importance that a game can be made pornographic with things downloaded off the internet!

    This whole situation is just a bizarre combination of sexual prudism combined with a complete lack of technical knowledge, I'm ashamed to be on the same continent where stuff this ignorent stupidity occurs.

    --
    I stole this Sig
  25. What's sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander by Locke2005 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The SIMS has an ESRB rating of E-T (Everyone/Teens). However, there is a patch available for The SIMS that removes the dithering done when they are changing clothes, allowing one to see buck naked SIMS!. Doesn't this mean the ESRB should also revoke The SIMS "Everyone" rating?

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  26. Re:Of course by houghi · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Unfortunately, show me a country that doesn't rely on war to keep the peace and I'll show you a country that is ripe for the taking by one that does.

    Switzerland?

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  27. Boots excepted by cryptochrome · · Score: 4, Funny

    From what I understand the sex scenes aren't even particularly explicit. Who does it with their clothes on, I mean really?

    Oh wait, considering how objectionable these people seem to think this scene is, they probably ARE the type of people who do it with their clothes on.

    --

    ---If you can't trust a nerd, who can you trust?

    1. Re:Boots excepted by mysidia · · Score: 3, Interesting

      How are we to know they even saw the scene? Perhaps they just read press releases about the ability to modify the game to ''unlock'' sexually explicit imagery.

      Who says they know how difficult it is to ''unlock'' the images and how much of the information is created in process by the people modifying the game?

      Will they be upset if there were a press release that a group had discovered a modification in the form of a software patch that could be applied to a certain brand of TV or DVD player to bypass the V-chip and expect the manufacturer to recall the line or add a disclaimer prohibiting sales of the TVs/DVD players to people under 18?

  28. Re:Of course by NotoriousQ · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This nonsense is coming from American morons and Shrubby is their moron king.

    Actually, this specific non-sense is pouring from the liberal side of the US governemnt. Clinton, Lieberman, etc. They have been itching to go after GTA for years, but could not as Americans love the macho gore as part of the entertainment. Thus they waited until they can make that into a "think of the children" deal.

    The funny part is that I have not heard a word from the conservative side, although the religious right I am sure is on the same side. It is currently the moderate republicans and libertarians that have the most sense these days.

    Oh, and do not blame the GTA deal on Prez. Shrub. He is not turning those gears in motion. Blame the nanny-state liberals for this one.

    --
    badness 10000
  29. Further in further news by sockonafish · · Score: 4, Funny

    The internet has been banned because of the possibility that children may buy bicycles online.

  30. I think GTA needs more explicit sex, not less by tokengeekgrrl · · Score: 4, Funny

    Think about it. GTA is the perfect medium by which to teach guys how to *really* pleasure a woman. As long as the gameplay makes you work for the woman's orgasm, meaning you're going to have to work those controls for more than 5 minutes guys, I say bring it on.

    GTA: Turning Geeks into Better Lovers

    ~tokengeekgrrl

  31. Re:Of course by aaronl · · Score: 3, Interesting

    They maintain their sovereignity through the threat of force and retaliation. They have more active military personnel than any other country. I believe it's every male between 18 and 45 that is armed and trained. You're required to do service as part of your citizenship.

    Also, they have much of the world's money. ;-)

  32. Re:Of course by Dun+Malg · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Unfortunately, show me a country that doesn't rely on war to keep the peace and I'll show you a country that is ripe for the taking by one that does.

    Switzerland?

    I think the more technically correct challenge should have been "show me a country that doesn't rely on it's ability to fight a war to keep the peace". In that case, Switzerland doesn't qualify as practically every dang person in the country has a government-issued assault rifle and attends Schutzenfest regularly, the idea being that the whole country is the army, even the women. This (plus the terrain) is the real reason why the Schweiz have been able to stay "neutral": they're essentially unconquerable.

    --
    If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
  33. An important thing to realize.. by vhold · · Score: 4, Informative
    A lot of people are running around in here wondering what is so important between M and AO as if there is no big reason for R* to care.

    Basically Wal-mart won't carry AO.

    Senate Testimony to that effect
    In the case of video games (for example, Sony Playstation or Nintendo games) and computer software, we use the ESRB, Entertainment Software Rating Board, ratings (EC, E, T, M, and AO) as we make decisions about which products to carry. We do not carry software rated adults only (as rated by the ESRB). As a rule, we do not carry Parental Advisory stickered products.
    That is all.
  34. The Nipple Pixel Effect: A Demonstation by poena.dare · · Score: 3, Funny

    Here is a overly simplified, but rather useful demonstration of what is now called "The Nipple Pixel Effect" Please examine the images below carefully!

    This is a (highly magnified) default pixel: .
    The pixel is devoid of content, ready to receive nuance and meaning. As many Slashdot regulars know, the scientific name for this state is "boring".

    This is a (highly magnified) weapon pixel: .
    Note that the pixel is now filled with violent energies. Careful examination of this pixel shows its propensity to do damage to peace-loving liberal agendas. The scientific name for a pixel in this state is "fun".

    This is a (highly magnified) nipple pixel: .
    This pixel is heaving with throbbing unquenced sexual desire. Take the time to examine this pixel more closely and you will notice how it seems to be renlentless thrusting at your closed, but oh so moist mind with expansive heat which melts conservative agendas. The scientific name for a pixel in this state is "more fun" to male computer scientists and "yeah, whatever" to female computer scientists.

    Now, if we examine the firm, yet silky nipple pixel, gently take it between our fingers, so to speak, we can see that the pixel is actually composed of discreet... OH MY GOD ITS ZOMBIE STROM THURMOND AND HIS NEO-CONSORVATORS OF MORAL DISCIPLINE. HELP! THEY'VE MADE IT THROUGH MY FRONT DOOR. ACK! RICK SANTORUM'S SECRET TWO-HEADED FETUS-MONSTER IS CHEWING ON MY CABLE MODEM. AGH! I DON'T KNOW HOW MUCH LONGER I CAN HOLD OUT. ECK! BILL FRIST JUST DISECTED MY CAT! OH THE HUMANITY! PLEASE TELL MY WIFE I LOVE HER VERY M...

  35. Yet Further in further news by ShadowEFX · · Score: 5, Funny

    Children are banned, having been found to be a result of pornography.

  36. Re:Of course by ilyaaohell · · Score: 3, Funny

    I don't think that a Schützenfest is what you think it is. It's a festival, also held in other German-speaking countries, that was originally rooted in archery and shooting competitions, but is now just a big celebration for the whole family. It involves fair-type games, parades, concerts, and other tourist-enticing activities.

    --
    UNIX: A computer user is defined as a programmer. WINDOWS: A computer user is defined as a consumer.