Slashdot Mirror
Mandriva Linux 2006 Beta Underway
linuxbeta writes "Distrowatch is reporting that 'The beta testing process for Mandriva Linux 2006 is now officially underway. All the new features, which are not yet all included in this first beta version, will appear in the next test versions. You will see changes in the network management, especially WiFi, in security, on the desktop with the new versions of KDE, GNOME, new version of the kernel, GCC....'. Screenshots are available."
and then we would have another story once the beta is out.. but with the same links and screenshots, what we call here a dupe!
Figured this would be as on-topic as anywhere...
I'm thinkin of dropping Linux on a somewhat outdated computer I have lying around. It's a Celeron 533 w/ 256MB of RAM.
Which user-friendly distribution would be more friendly to that kind of hardware? And God help anyone that says Gentoo..
"Ask not what your country can do for you." --John F. Kennedy
"Mandriva Linux suxorz! The best distro is _____ biznatches!!"
"Yeah well all linux suxorz! Windows is teh roxorz!"
"Hey guys wait! MacOSX is linux and it's the best thing god ever handed down to humans!"
"No n00b, MacOSX is BSD."
"Yeah well all BSD's suxorz! Windows is teh roxorz!"
Hmmm witty sig or funny sig? Maybe elitest techy sig!
Sigh. ISO downloads instead of bit-torrents. Maybe they figure the beta won't be popular enough to get lots of downloaders at once, but they still ought to be efficient about it.
Bill Stewart
New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
...and the award for the most ridiculous Linux distribution name goes to... Mandriva! Hounorable mention to the runner up, Kubuntu.
___
If you think big enough, you'll never have to do it.
Or another UI concern - if you're going to support 2 different window managers, why restrict it to the coke/pepsi of window managers? KDE and Gnome are now full-featured enough that providing both is basically just doubling the workload of the package maintainers for little gain - you have to make sure all your apps and config tools get along with both. More sensible would be to pick one of the big, modern, heavyweight WMs and also include a low-resource WM for use on legacy boxen.
Of course, even distros that do include Ice or XFCE don't actually set up their tools to work with them, so using a low-resource WM just gets you a GUI-aided command prompt and not much else.
Will this contain support for Atmel and Prism built in or will we have to go and get Prism Drivers or Atmel Drivers? The only problem without having built-in support is that for the Atmel you have to patch the kernel(only 2.6 and greater) and recompile it(takes awhile on a 1.7Ghz). It would be major convience for built-in support for these commonly used chipsets. I hope that this new distribution includes full WiFi support.
Fallout 3 will suck.
Queue up more boring screenshots on OSDir's clunky image browser. Possibly the most telling image is how they put GNU Emacs in the KDE Kicker and didn't configure any reasonable default colors for it matching the theme (those are the out of the box for gnu emacs). The rest are just bog standard desktop shots.
I am no longer wasting my time with slashdot
This is going to sound like a troll, but really it's not. Now, with all the talent and resources the linux community has, why can't someone come up with a beautiful default icon set for both KDE and Gnome? I don't care what anyone says, but those icons do not look professional and they are UGLY! First impressions matter, and to me, my first impression when I see a screenshot like that is, "What a POS". And before you say, "Well then, make your own icons", be assured that I would if I had the talent.
Now, it you want to see some examples of professional _and_ attractive icons, go to gnome-look.org and take a look at the Exquisite, Edge, or d3a icons.
KDE 3.4 has a lot of visual improvements. But from what I saw in the screenshots, the distribution is nothing more than Gnome and KDE with all their respective logos replaced by a yellow star. They should have placed the focus on their custom management applications and such. Looking at all those KDE screenshots is a waste of time once you've seen them before.
(I really like KDE, I use it every day)
Qui ne va pas à la chasse n'a pas de gibier
PHP Queb
This would be in line with past MS behavior. Microsoft often chooses "sloppy seconds" or "also-rans" as aquisition fare. This is a product of price conciousness, concerns of anti-trust action for snaring market leaders, and a disdain for anything not originating in-house. Past indicators ere were Great Plans Accounting, Interix,Connectix Virtual PC, RAV Anti Virus and Giant Anti Spyware. Mandrake/Connectiva/Turbo, with their miniscule commercial share (they are a sliver of RedHat - which is a fraction of a sliver of MS) is ideal.
The Winix Beta will not yet include Avalon or Indigo subsystems, although a rudimentary transplant of the .NET CLR and frameworks are rumored to be in the works once Redmond fully grasps this beast by the tail. Much of this work has been done on the BSD platform, and reputedly the internal Micosoft build - project Marklar - runs the Avalon-based Windows Dodge Colt Vista interface as flawlessly as XP.
"Flyin' in just a sweet place,
Never been known to fail..."
Doesn't it look like Tux just got a beating?e lease=388&slide=22
http://shots.osdir.com/slideshows/slideshow.php?r
You mean I've been using something else for four years? I mean, my partitions have been reiserfs since I can remember, all the way from at least 'drake 9.2. And it hasn't changed with the latest release: you can choose between ext2, ext3, reiserfs, at the very least. Maybe you were thinking of Fedora?
"I think it would be a good idea!"
Gandhi, about Internet Security
I've never had that library issue you're talking about with compiling so I can't help you there.
As for RAM, it's a python-based graphical installer, what do you want? Text based is available if you need to stay slim. It's not like it uses that much RAM anyway. top resports it using 37 megs right now.
That is exactly what Mandriva does. They were one of the first distros (or THE first) to support *ALL* the desktop enviornments seamlessly (Kde, gnome, ice, blackbox, fce, etc) and all the configuration tools work the same in all of them. Icing on the cake is Mandriva's menu manager which automatically creates a standard "start" menu for every desktop environment and keeps them all synchronized when you add or remove software.
Most distros just use the default Gnome or KDE theme. Through laziness or maybe they think it actually is the best default. I don't know.
Most people theme theirs though. It doesn't matter to me what the theme is that comes wih a distro; I'm going to change it. Some distros probably realize that we do this and don't bother putting an effort into the looks.
A few distros look different, like Blag. Hmm, that's not very pretty. Maybe that's why distros should stick to the KDE and Gnome default themes.