Lynn Settles With Cisco, Investigated By FBI
Following up on yesterday's story, daria42 writes "Security researcher Michael Lynn has settled a dispute with Cisco over his presentation on hacking the company's routers, which was given at the Black Hat security conference in Las Vegas this week. The two parties and Black Hat organisers have agreed not to further discuss the presentation, which contained techniques Lynn said could bring the Internet to its knees." Not all is good news, though. jzeejunk writes "The FBI is investigating computer security researcher Michael Lynn for criminal conduct after he revealed that critical routers supporting the internet and many networks have a serious software flaw that could allow someone to crash or take control of them."
The real issue at hand, at least with Cisco router owners, is not the fact that Lynn released information concerning the exploit, but the fact that Cisco would not tell anyone about it. Time and time again has shown how security through obscurity is not real security, especially when Cisco's source code had been stolen.
The reality of it is that Cisco fixed the exploit last April with a patch and no longer offers the vulnerable IOS for download on their site. The problem with that though is that they did not inform anyone what the patch fixed and who needed to download it. Most people who are vulnerable to this attack are those who have not updated to Cisco's version as of April (which are a few I'm sure. No point on upgrading a working system with a patch that could break you.)
The real problem is Cisco and their disregard to release information over a severe vulnerability in order to press forward their new OS next year.
I'm a virgo and on Slashdot. Coincidence? Yes.
I found this linked on Nick84's site (http://www.rootsecure.net/): http://www.infowarrior.org/users/rforno/lynn-cisco .pdf
If I'm correct, it's the slides that were taken off of the hand out cd.
Another link from a Wired article:
http://cryptome.org/lynn-cisco.zip
Irongeek's Hacking Videos / Security Videos and Articles
"There's no arrest warrant for (Lynn) and there are no charges filed and no case pending," Granick said. "There may never be. But they got a complaint and as a result they were doing some investigation."
In other words, probably not really in trouble with the FBI.
The world's only surviving livewriter.
Further, Lynn himself admitted that the vulnerability had already been patched by a Cisco update.
One specific buffer overflow vulnerability was patched. But Lynn's presentation was a general approach to exploit any buffer overflow, with dire consequences. There is likely more exploitable code inside those routers; it's just a matter of time before some is found. At that point Lynn's attack could be executed.
Crafted IPv6 packet vulnerability.
5 0729-ipv6.shtml
s p
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/cisco-sa-200
http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1841669,00.a
Upshot is that if you aren't running IPv6 on the router, this doesn't affect you.
In other words, give Cisco the opportunity to explain that patching vulnerabilities in major commercial vendor-supported code isn't just something that happens instantaneously.
He gave Cisco *FOUR MONTHS* to fix it, which is hardly "instantaneous".