Slashdot Mirror


The Eyes of the Space Shuttle

Roland Piquepaille writes "Now that Discovery astronaut Steve Robinson has successfully removed two pieces of fabric poking out of the shuttle's heat shield, a question remains: how did NASA discover these anomalies in the first place? In this article, Forbes.com writes that NASA can say thank you to a private Canadian company, Neptec, and its Laser Camera system (LCS). Neptec is working with NASA for ten years now, but it was the first time that its vision technology was used for external damage assessment of a shuttle. As NASA says it may cancel some future shuttle flights, Neptec plans to implement its 3-D imaging technology in military situations and on the battlefield. But read more for other details, references and pictures about this imaging technology."

12 of 164 comments (clear)

  1. Hey Roland, GET A JOB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful


    and stop ripping off other websites content

    1. Re:Hey Roland, GET A JOB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Roland already has a very nice and probably very profitable job finding interesting articles and posting them to Slashdot.

    2. Re:Hey Roland, GET A JOB by RobertB-DC · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Roland already has a very nice and probably very profitable job finding interesting articles and posting them to Slashdot.

      Now that he can profit from the difficult situation on the shuttle, there's no telling what he'll do next! Buy out OSDN perhaps, so we can have Rollin' PigPile All The Time! ... oh, wait, we already have that. My bad.

      --
      Stressed? Me? Of course not. Stress is what a rubber band feels before it breaks, silly.
  2. Roland - serious request by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Please, please, PLEASE, editors, stop posting these submissions to the front page, or give them a filterable category so that we can choose not to see them.


    You might consider doing the same for all blog-type submissions, or anything that might be construed as an ad (see the "help me port my game" submission from earlier).

    1. Re:Roland - serious request by Bastian · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yeah, who wants a website that simply posts small excerpts of and links to other people's news, usually with a little smidgeon of side commentary from the editor, provides space for readers to comment on it? Especially when said site makes its money from selling ad space.

      Oh wait, did I just describe Slashdot? I guess I did. Tee-hee.

      Fuck, people, what's your problem with Roland? At least he reads the articles he's linking, finds his own content to index, puts some effort into citing his sources (which the /. eds themseles neverdo), and checks his grammar and spelling.

      It's really heard to listen to the complaints you folks are raising about him, knowing that they are coming from Slashdot readers.

  3. Slashdot: Land Of Hypocracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Roland Piquepaille shows his plagarist mug again, and the Slashdot editing staff is more than happy to give front page space to this known thief. Why can't the cowardly Slashdot staff simply confront the many who protest Roland's "stories" being posted? Where's the "open source" mentality which gets thrown around here so frequently. When will Slashdot admit they are hypocrites?

  4. Two for Two! by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Two Roland stories in two days! Slashdot must not be getting enough quality submissions from OTHER people.

    --
    "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
  5. Total Agreement by Lord+Byron+II · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Roland's constant inane postings are just bringing down the overall quality. It should be a hint when there's a Firefox extension to remove him from the front page.

  6. Re:Slashdot: Land Of Hypocracy by fishlet · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Thank you for your balanced assessment of this situation.

    Many slashdot readers detest the idea of their own comments being censored... but then whine about when slashdot excercises it's right to post what it bloody well wants on it's front page. They did the same thing with Jon Katz, their doing it with Roland, and when he's gone they'll find another target.

    BTW- I think the filters are a fine idea too... The Right to not listen is just as important as the right to speak.

  7. Canada Canada Canada by GISGEOLOGYGEEK · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If we can put aside all the Roland protests for a second, lets go a bit deeper into the actual story ...

    Yes it is Canadian lidar technology that was used to scan the shuttle for damage.

    But, what you'll never hear from any American media outlet is that the laser camera was mounted on the Canadian extention arm ... used to give more reach to the Canadarm. ... you know, that device that american media refers to only as the remote manipulator arm, never by its proper name, yes, the device that hauled in the Hubble telescope for repairs must never get the credit it is due. Remember how it's Canada insignia was removed to hide its origin during the big media coverage of the hubble events? Wouldn't want anyone to think that anyone other than the US can do anything great now would you!

    And of course the lets not forget about the other big tool that helps assemble the space station ... as well as taking more pictures to investigate the shuttle, the robotic arm that can go end over end inch worming between connection points along the space station ... the Canadarm2

    Do you Americans build any of the space hardware you use?

    --
    George Bush + Linux = "I will not let information get in the way of the fight against Windows"
    1. Re:Canada Canada Canada by darkmeridian · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Do you Americans build any of the space hardware you use?

      Uh, besides the Space Shuttle?

      --
      A NYC lawyer blogs. http://www.chuangblog.com/
  8. I hate playing blogscotch. by pavon · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I have no problem with a site that posts small excerpts and links to other people's news. I appreciate that there are people who take the time to go out and look for interesting things and post them. Then if I find the same things interesting I don't have to all that work. I love it when people (dj's) who are enthusiastic about music and actively seek out new stuff, and bring it to me every week. I like it when journalists do the same. I am even willing (and I do) support these people with money.

    I do, however, have a problem with a site that posts small excerpts and links to other sites with small excerpts, which links to other sites with small excerpts and to get to the actual meat of the story you have to go play hopscotch through a bunch of worthless blogs, or do a google search. It defeats the entire purpose of an aggregator site which is to do the work of find interesting information, so I don't have to.

    So, I don't have a problem with Roland's site. Heck, it seems to be better edited than Slashdot. I do have a problem with Slashdot constantly linking to it rather than to a direct source (or as direct of a source as they can find).