Slashdot Mirror


Rockstar's Next Game Draws Protesters

Rockstar's next title, Bully, has already come under fire from anti-bullying groups. Activists have taken it up another notch, though, by demonstrating outside of the NY Rockstar offices. They've also laid out a list of demands to the game developer, hoping to get the company to change its ways. The Peaceoholics demand Rockstar "Not to release Bully under any circumstances, Volunteer to sell its violent and sexually explicit games in adult video stores only, Let parents return Grand Theft Auto for a full refund until they do a national awareness campaign to educate parents of content and possible effects, Create a fund for victims of unauthorized use of a motor vehicle and car-jackings, etc, Make a national apology for misleading and lying to children, parents, and legislators about their intentions and causing insurance premiums to sky rocket, Give a written response within five business days of receipt of these demands" Press the Buttons has commentary, and uses some words I'd like to myself.

20 of 207 comments (clear)

  1. ROFLMAO by pudding7 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    AHAHAHAHA AHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAlLOLOLOLOLLo!!!!!eleventyone!!!111 !!

    Those "demands" are hilarious.

  2. A list of demands? by Quattro+Vezina · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Aren't lists of demands what terrorists give when they hold people hostage?

    --
    I support the Center for Consumer Freedom
    1. Re:A list of demands? by rbarreira · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, but also "correlation doesn't imply causation".

      --

      The AACS key is NOT 0xF606EEFD628B1CA427BEA93A9CA9773F
    2. Re:A list of demands? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
      Comparing people protesting the creation of games which simulate and encourage antisocial behavior to terrorists gets modded up as "Insightful"?

      I weep for society.

    3. Re:A list of demands? by wed128 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I believe any attempt to attack my or anyone else's right to free speach an act of extreme anti-patriotism...

      Who else can we think of as anti-patriot?

  3. Personal Responsibility is Dead... by xTMFWahoo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I can't understand why no one blames the parents for subjecting their children to violent video games. It's the parents responsibility to monitor their kids- what TV shows/movies they watch, what video games they play ect.

    Parents need to start doing their jobs IMHO.

    --
    "Patriotism is supporting your country all the time, and your government when it deserves it." Mark Twain.
    1. Re:Personal Responsibility is Dead... by PhilippeT · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That's when parents will tell you that you (and everyone else) have no right to tell them how to raise their children.

      In my book parents shouldn't be allowed to harm their child via negligence.

      This includes letting them play a game, watching TV, etc... without understand that the actions in them is not always meant to be repeated.

      Meaning if you see someone going into space it doesn't mean you will never be able to. If you work hard you may be able to. But it does mean that if in game XYZ you can hit people with a hammer and they make funny noises it's not real and you shouldn't do it.

      That's my 2 cents

      --
      A psychopath can't tell the difference between right and wrong. A sociopath knows the difference - he just doesn't care.
    2. Re:Personal Responsibility is Dead... by negative3 · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Absolutely.

      Ignorance of the law is not a defense in a courtroom, so how can "responsible" parents use that as an excuse when it comes to raising their own children?

      When I was young, my parents let me watch whatever I wanted (within reason) and play whatever I wanted (then again, I grew up with NES, so that's probably a bit of a stretch). BUT they did explain to me the difference between right and wrong and gave me a good clue about how to conduct myself as a member of a civilized society.

      Why don't we start protesting the protest group by giving them a list of demands? I'll start one:

      • raise your own kids and let us raise ours
      • stop making it harder for responsible adults to buy violent games
      • start a fund to pay for the migraine medicine for the headaches you cause reasonable, intelligent people
      • if these demands aren't met within 5 days of receipt, we'll know you have no sense of humor either
      --
      "Physics is to math what sex is to masturbation." - Richard Feynman
    3. Re:Personal Responsibility is Dead... by joeljkp · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Good thing blaming the parents is damned easy.

      I wouldn't want to come up with an actual good policy solution that will let parents and kids both keep their freedom and also reduce the harm that some of this stuff causes when it inevitably gets into their hands.

      Rather, I think I'll just lobby the government to allow porn, liquor, and drugs to flow through the streets, then jail the parents of any kid who reaches out and touches it.

      --
      WeRelate.org - wiki-based genealogy
    4. Re:Personal Responsibility is Dead... by ivan256 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      reduce the harm that some of this stuff causes when it inevitably gets into their hands.

      Exposure doesn't cause harm. Exposure without understanding causes harm.

      Since it's near impossible to shield children from all exposure from things their parents find objectionable, you could say that the lack of exposure causes harm, since without exposure there is no understanding.

      Hiding things you disapprove of is bad. When they see something you don't like, don't cover their eyes, explain why it's bad. That way you have control over what they think about that thing. Otherwise they will be exposed to it when you're not around and forming their own opinions; opinions you may not approve of. Children don't learn your values if you hide them. This isn't limited to children either. Censorship in almost all forms is bad for this reason.

      Have you ever seen a group of kids catch a glimpse of nudity in an 'R' rated film? You can tell the difference between the kids with parents who hide such things from their children and the kids with parents who teach them about those things. The kids who's parents have explained what was happening tend to cover their eyes when the nudity comes on. The kids who have never been exposed to it get really wide-eyed.

  4. Gone too far by Nytewynd · · Score: 3, Insightful


    causing insurance premiums to sky rocket


    WTF? You can make arguments that Rockstar games are bad for young kids, but are we really at the point where we are blaming a game company because our insurance premiums are too high? Maybe premiums are too high because we have idiots on the road. Idiots like the people that blame game companies for insurance premiums.

    I hate when groups of "watchdogs" make demands. Who do these people think they are? They tend to make up offensive facts (OMG, the purple puppet is a flaming homo!!!) just to have something to bitch about. Or they take one quote out of context and then go on-and-on about it, twisting it until even reasonable people think it is offensive. This happens in politics all the time. I guess Rockstar got what they wanted though. As they keep pushing the envelope on what kind of ridiculous content you can fit into a game, they are going to get more and more of this.

    Part of me thinks Rockstar is trying to make money by peddling offensive ideas to kids, but that really doesn't matter. Parents should be preventing kids from buying this stuff, or face the consequences when Little Johny pummels someone in 3rd grade because Bully is his favorite game.

    I'm just waiting for a game where you can strangle a prostitute with a bungee cord, and beat up a cop with strips of bacon. That will be the funnest game ever.
    --
    /. ++
  5. Not so sure about Bully by defkkon · · Score: 3, Insightful
    I love GTA: San Andreas. I've put a lot of hours into it, and think its some great entertainment. I agree with the standard argument of "Parents should regulate what their children play, and pay attention to what comes into their household", blah blah blah. We've all heard the arguments.

    But a game about Bullying students and teachers in a fictional schoolyard? There's almost no doubt in my mind that I will purchase (and probably enjoy!) this game, but c'mon Rockstar, can you push some more buttons?

    With all the sensationalized stories about bullying in schools, children committing suicide due to being harassed, etc. do you really think its wise to make a game like this?

    I realize it'll be rated M. I know that there will be ESRB warnings around Violence, Language, etc. I also realize that this sort of stuff is great publicity for their game releases. But games like this DO give the electronic entertainment industry a bad name. Its already under fire for "Hot Coffee". Do they really need to demonize video games any more?

    And before someone says it, NO, I don't believe creative game-making should be stymied by groups such as the ones protesting Bully. I just think they should become more creative in ways OTHER than kicking the crap out of children in a schoolyard. I think that Pikmin, Katamari Damacy, Morrowind, etc. were just as creative an "out there" as GTA. But no one is coming after the industry because you killed some cartoonish Pikmin.

    1. Re:Not so sure about Bully by defkkon · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Ever heard of the First Amendment? Rockstar can make whatever kind of game they want. You are welcome to live in China if you are unhappy with the concept of freedom of speech. You want to drag this to the extreme? Ok. They can make a game where people yell fire in crowded theaters. Happy?

      Yeah, that's the point I was trying to make - we should ban all forms of creative expression, and the government should have full control over all industry.

      Geesh.

      Its called having a social conscience. It has nothing to do with the first ammendment. The goal of a commercial company is to do what it can to make as much money as possible. However, a company can also have a social conscience. Just because something makes you money by selling millions of copies, doesn't neccessarily mean that you should do it.

      A company can make whatever type of game they want, sure, but should they? I believe that there is a fine line. I love ultra-violent games. But when there's a social issue that is popular with extremists (ie. bullying in schools), why stir up the pot? Its just one side of the argument. I don't believe in censorship - I believe in having social conscience, and the fact that they should perhaps try and help the video game industry from looking bad.

    2. Re:Not so sure about Bully by westlake · · Score: 2, Insightful
      c'mon Rockstar, can you push some more buttons?

      I think this is what should be worrying every gamer. You can't help wondering what Rockstar and others have in the pipeline...when the next shoe will drop.

      I do not want the M rating to become synonymous with rape-torture-kill. I do not want sexual themes in gaming to be defined by the mysognistic gang culture of Grand Theft Auto. I do not want to see the modding community disappear because development tools, game assets, and code have been locked down tight.

      The voluntary ratings system is hanging by a thread and Rockstar continues to poison the water.

      It is time to stop blaming the parents and the politicians for the Hot Coffee fiasco and take a look at what has been happening closer to home.

  6. Here's why the protest is unreasonable by dstone · · Score: 2, Insightful

    In their demands, the protesters refer to Bully, a game that's currently under development, and demand Rockstar to:

    "Not to release Bully under any circumstances "

    The "under any circumstances" part is where they stop being reasonable and rational (and where I stop listening). Essentially, they're saying that they're going to protest any game called "Bully" that Rockstar releases, even if the content was radically edited, sanitized, censored, etc.

    This makes it clear that the protesters are not actually interested in improving or sanitizing game content, but that they're simply out for revenge against Rockstar, even if Rockstar was willing to compromise or negotiate.

  7. Financial Suicide for Rockstar by tepp · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Let parents return Grand Theft Auto for a full refund until they do a national awareness campaign to educate parents of content and possible effects

    Gahhhh.

    This stuff is giving me heart-burn, I tell you.

    If Rockstar were to do that, it would be financial suicide. There are millions of units of GTA:SA sold right now. And there a millions of people who have finished - the PS2 version at least - the game. Most of these people sell their games back to ebgames at a loss. But if Rockstar were to offer a refund, it wouldn't be JUST the parents who would return the game for money... it would be every cheap college student who could use 50$, despite the fact they have no objections to the game. It would be morally wrong, but when you're in college and living off of ramen and cheep beer, you don't care.

    Literally, it would provide a free game to millions of people, where they would play it, then return it for a full refund. Financial suicide for Rockstar!

    These people need to have "I am stupid" tattooed on their forehead. The game already has a list of all that's wrong with it, including Explicit Sexual Content as one of the items. How much more explicit can you get than listing it straight on the box next to the big "M for Mature" logo?

    --
    Tepp
  8. Amazon's Description by myheroBobHope · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Welcome to the fictional Bullworth Academy where you play a troubled schoolboy named Jimmy in reform school who tries to stand up to bullies, gets picked on by teachers, plays pranks on annoying kids from all over campus, and even tries to pursue a love interest.

    Sounds really bad for kids... almost like REAL school. Which isn't dangerous at all, that's why they have metal detectors.

    --
    http://www.pterrys.com
  9. goodwill by rayde · · Score: 2, Insightful
    the mood of the comments here is obviously on the side of Rockstar, and I tend to agree with some of them, as I do value freedom to choose what games I can play.

    however, I believe it would be a nice gesture of goodwill for Rockstar to do something along the lines of the one demand, "Create a fund for victims of unauthorized use of a motor vehicle and car-jackings, etc". they could give something beneficial to those affected by such tragedy, instead of simply glorifying the perpetrators through their games.

    I don't think it's gonna happen though.

  10. Why is it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    ..when a bunch of folks start protesting against every policy by the current Administration, or by any Republican at all, the media and many here hail them as heroes for using peaceful means to expedite change.

    But some concerned citizens use exactly the same methods to right what they perceive as evil, they're automatically labelled as fools, and treated as obstructionists.

    Way I see it, this is how such things *should* be done. Just like a boycott-grass roots *action* from the people, not repressive laws and suits from lawyers.

    Just like the activities against games labelled as "racist". Vote with your wallet, and gvie your opinion voice-don't pervert the laws and make the government enforce morality.

    whatever happened to "I may disagree with what you say, but I'll fight to the death to defend your right to say it"? Are protests only allowed if they're anti-establishment, anti government, anti-christian or anti-Republican?

  11. Re:Arrogance that could power a city. by 2008 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Good idea! I sent this:

    My List of Demands for Peaceaholics

    # Not to produce further press releases under any circumstances.
    # Volunteer to promote its anti-fun and anti-freedom agenda in organic food markets only.
    # Let those people affected by your activities apply to have the ten minutes of their lives fully refunded.
    # Not to do a national awareness campaign to propagandise about possible effects, but to jointly fund with a game publisher an unbiased study based on the scientific method to attempt to find any actual effects.
    # Create a fund for victims of pressure groups.
    # Make a national apology for misleading and lying to children, parents, and legislators and causing share prices to plummet.
    # Give a written response in the New York and Los Angeles Times within five business days of receipt of these demands.

    -------Original list for comparison:

    Peaceoholics List of Demands for Rock Star Games

    # Not to release Bully under any circumstances
    # Volunteer to sell its violent and sexually explicit games in adult video stores only.
    # Let parents return Grand Theft Auto for a full refund until they do a national awareness campaign to educate parents of content and possible effects.
    # Create a fund for victims of unauthorized use of a motor vehicle and car-jackings, etc.
    # Make a national apology for misleading and lying to children, parents, and legislators about their intentions and causing insurance premiums to sky rocket.
    # Give a written response within five business days of receipt of these demands

    --
    I quit!